Voting Procedures Under a Restricted Domain An Examination of the (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to Five Main Paradoxes /
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| 企業作者: | |
| 總結: | X, 92 p. text |
| 語言: | 英语 |
| 出版: |
Cham :
Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer,
2019.
|
| 版: | 1st ed. 2019. |
| 叢編: | SpringerBriefs in Economics,
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12627-8 |
| 格式: | 電子 圖書 |
書本目錄:
- Introduction
- 20 Voting Procedures Designed to Elect a Single Candidate
- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to Lack of Monotonicity in a Restricted Domain
- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to the Inconsistency Paradox (aka Reinforcement Paradox) in a Restricted Domain
- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to the No-Show Paradox in a Restricted Domain
- Which of the 20 Voting Procedures Satisfy or Violate the Subset Choice Condition (SCC) in a Restricted Domain?
- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to the Preference Inversion Paradox in a Restricted Domain
- Summary.