Образ технологического лидерства в парадигме коммуникации событий; Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология; № 90

Bibliographic Details
Parent link:Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология.— .— Томск: Изд-во ТГУ
№ 90.— 2026.— С. 104-112
Main Author: Лукьянова Н. А. Наталия Александровна
Corporate Author: Томский политехнический университет Бизнес-школа
Other Authors: Лукьянова О. К. Ольга Кирилловна
Summary:Заглавие с экрана
В статье обосновывается событийный подход к образу технологического лидерства, согласно которому событие не предшествует коммуникации, а активно конструируется в коммуникативных процессах. В данном контексте лидерство рассматривается как перформативный нарратив. Он формируется в сложной сети взаимодействующих событий и, в конечном итоге, конструирует саму реальность лидерства, выступая в роли общественного консенсуса. Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов
This article effects a theoretical shift in the study of the image of technological leadership, moving its analysis from the plane of static representation to a dynamic paradigm of processuality and event-ness. The author argues that under the conditions of “liquid modernity” (Z. Bauman), the image of leadership ceases to be a fixed sign and transforms into a complex communicative event, continuously reproduced within public discourse. The methodological framework comprises a synthesis of A.N. Whitehead’s process philosophy and contemporary communication theories. Departing from classical approaches (the representative and constitutive paradigms of the image), the author adopts the “evental turn,” examining the image through the prism of its becoming. A key dichotomy is introduced and delineated: the “communication of events” (an ontological process of the mutual influence of actual entities, following Whitehead) and the “communicative event” (a phenomenological act of exchanging meanings). It is argued that the image of technological leadership is constituted precisely within the space of their intersection. The main thesis of the article posits that contemporary technological leadership functions as a performative narrative. It establishes itself and becomes a social fact not through the declaration of attributes but through a chain of public, mediatized performance-events (e.g., SpaceX launches or Apple keynotes), which are experienced by the audience as a co-experience (co-being). These events, following Whitehead’s logic, are acts of “concrescence,” synthesizing past experience, cultural codes, and future expectations into a new nodal point of meaning. As a case study, the promotion of the Apple Vision Pro is analyzed in detail as a complex “organism-event” generating a chain of new communicative acts. Thus, the image of technological leadership is not a reflection of a pre-existing reality but an active, processual instrument for its construction. It emerges and is legitimized within the process of the “communication of events,” where the event itself (a breakthrough, a presentation) and its communication are inseparable. Leadership is revealed as a dynamic, performative process rooted in the very fabric of communicative reality, constantly assembling and reassembling social consensus around itself. The authors declare no conflicts of interests
Текстовый файл
Language:Russian
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=91705426
https://journals.tsu.ru/philosophy/&journal_page=archive&id=2730&article_id=56617
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=688471

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 688471
005 20261009095022.0
090 |a 688471 
100 |a 20261009d2026 k||y0rusy50 ca 
101 0 |a rus 
102 |a RU 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i   |b  e  
182 0 |a b 
183 0 |a cr  |2 RDAcarrier 
200 1 |a Образ технологического лидерства в парадигме коммуникации событий  |d The image of technological leadership within the event communication paradigm  |f Н. А. Лукьянова, О. К. Лукьянова  |z eng 
283 |a online_resource  |2 RDAcarrier 
300 |a Заглавие с экрана 
320 |a Список литературы: 9 назв 
330 |a В статье обосновывается событийный подход к образу технологического лидерства, согласно которому событие не предшествует коммуникации, а активно конструируется в коммуникативных процессах. В данном контексте лидерство рассматривается как перформативный нарратив. Он формируется в сложной сети взаимодействующих событий и, в конечном итоге, конструирует саму реальность лидерства, выступая в роли общественного консенсуса. Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов 
330 |a This article effects a theoretical shift in the study of the image of technological leadership, moving its analysis from the plane of static representation to a dynamic paradigm of processuality and event-ness. The author argues that under the conditions of “liquid modernity” (Z. Bauman), the image of leadership ceases to be a fixed sign and transforms into a complex communicative event, continuously reproduced within public discourse. The methodological framework comprises a synthesis of A.N. Whitehead’s process philosophy and contemporary communication theories. Departing from classical approaches (the representative and constitutive paradigms of the image), the author adopts the “evental turn,” examining the image through the prism of its becoming. A key dichotomy is introduced and delineated: the “communication of events” (an ontological process of the mutual influence of actual entities, following Whitehead) and the “communicative event” (a phenomenological act of exchanging meanings). It is argued that the image of technological leadership is constituted precisely within the space of their intersection. The main thesis of the article posits that contemporary technological leadership functions as a performative narrative. It establishes itself and becomes a social fact not through the declaration of attributes but through a chain of public, mediatized performance-events (e.g., SpaceX launches or Apple keynotes), which are experienced by the audience as a co-experience (co-being). These events, following Whitehead’s logic, are acts of “concrescence,” synthesizing past experience, cultural codes, and future expectations into a new nodal point of meaning. As a case study, the promotion of the Apple Vision Pro is analyzed in detail as a complex “organism-event” generating a chain of new communicative acts. Thus, the image of technological leadership is not a reflection of a pre-existing reality but an active, processual instrument for its construction. It emerges and is legitimized within the process of the “communication of events,” where the event itself (a breakthrough, a presentation) and its communication are inseparable. Leadership is revealed as a dynamic, performative process rooted in the very fabric of communicative reality, constantly assembling and reassembling social consensus around itself. The authors declare no conflicts of interests 
336 |a Текстовый файл 
461 1 |t Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология  |c Томск  |n Изд-во ТГУ 
463 1 |t № 90  |v С. 104-112  |d 2026 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a образ технологического лидерства 
610 1 |a философия процесса 
610 1 |a коммуникация событий 
610 1 |a перформативный нарратив 
700 1 |a Лукьянова  |b Н. А.  |c специалист в области психологии и права  |c профессор Томского политехнического университета, доктор философских наук  |f 1971-  |g Наталия Александровна  |9 11845 
701 1 |a Лукьянова  |b О. К.  |g Ольга Кирилловна 
712 0 2 |a Томский политехнический университет  |b Бизнес-школа  |c 2023-  |9 89344 
801 0 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20261009  |g RCR 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 0 |u https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=91705426  |z https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=91705426 
856 4 0 |u https://journals.tsu.ru/philosophy/&journal_page=archive&id=2730&article_id=56617  |z https://journals.tsu.ru/philosophy/&journal_page=archive&id=2730&article_id=56617 
942 |c CF