Tailoring the structure and phase composition of magnetoelectric nanotransducers for efficient neuromodulation under low-intensity magnetic fields; Ceramics International; Vol. 52, iss. 13, pt. A

Detaylı Bibliyografya
Parent link:Ceramics International.— .— Oxford: Elsevier Ltd
Vol. 52, iss. 13, pt. A.— 2026.— P. 21968-21987
Diğer Yazarlar: Koptsev D. A. Danila Andreevich, Chernozem P. V. Polina Viktorovna, Urakova A. O. Alina Olegovna, Lisitsyn S. A. Sergey Aleksandrovich, Vagner (Wagner) D. V. Dmitry Viktorovich, Kozadayeva M. Maria, Baksheev A. I. Artem Igorevich, Surmeneva M. A. Maria Alexandrovna, Gerasimov E. Yu. Evgeny, Amelina K. A. Kseniia, Nosov G. A. Georgy, Kazakova L. I. Lyubov, Sharapova M. B. Marina Borisovna, Romashchenko A. V. Aleksandr Viktorovich, Sukhorukov G. B. Gleb Borisovich, Surmenev R. A. Roman Anatolievich, Chernozem R. V. Roman Viktorovich
Özet:Title screen
Magnetoelectric (ME) core-shell nanoparticles (NPs) are promising for wireless neurostimulation, but achieving high ME response with biocompatible materials still remains a challenge. Herein, we report biocompatible ME core-shell MnFe2O4@Ba0.8Ca0.15Zr0.1Ti0.9O3 NPs (22 ± 4 nm) prepared using microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis with tailored structure and phase composition of a thin epitaxial BCZT shell (2-6 nm). Enhanced ME response and superior wireless neurostimulation performance under a low-intensity alternating magnetic field (AMF) (0-6 mT, 50 Hz) were demonstrated. The increase in the synthesis temperature (from 185 to 225 °C), alkali concentration (from 2 to 10 M), and duration (from 1 to 6 h) reduced the orthorhombic phase content while the fractions of the tetragonal (up to 63 %) and trigonal (up to 37 %) phases were increased. A synthesis temperature of 185 °C produced NPs with a partially amorphous shell and a trace Ba1.12Ti8O16-δ phase. This phase was absent in other ME NPs synthesized by reducing alkali content or reaction time. These specific structural changes, caused by the reduced synthesis temperature (185 °C), led to a drastic enhancement of the effective piezoelectric performance (18.25 ± 7.32 pm·V−1) and a more than threefold increase in the ME response (1.8 × 106 mV cm−1 Oe−1), ranking among the highest values reported for ME NPs. Consequently, neurons treated with NPs synthesized at 185 °C showed an ∼20% increase in the population of stimulated hippocampal neurons and a more than threefold enhancement in AMF-driven Ca2+ influx compared to those treated with NPs synthesized at 225 °C. Thus, the present work conclusively establishes MFO@BCZT as a validated proof-of-concept platform for magneto-neural interfacing, with a clear pathway for efficacy optimization through synthetic refinement
Текстовый файл
AM_Agreement
Dil:İngilizce
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: 2026
Konular:
Online Erişim:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2026.03.266
Materyal Türü: Elektronik Kitap Bölümü
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=687383

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 687383
005 20260709115333.0
090 |a 687383 
100 |a 20260709d2026 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a GB 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i   |b  e  
182 0 |a b 
183 0 |a cr  |2 RDAcarrier 
200 1 |a Tailoring the structure and phase composition of magnetoelectric nanotransducers for efficient neuromodulation under low-intensity magnetic fields  |f D. A. Koptsev, P. V. Chernozem, A. O. Urakova [et al.] 
203 |a Текст  |b визуальный  |c электронный 
283 |a online_resource  |2 RDAcarrier 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a References: 94 tit 
330 |a Magnetoelectric (ME) core-shell nanoparticles (NPs) are promising for wireless neurostimulation, but achieving high ME response with biocompatible materials still remains a challenge. Herein, we report biocompatible ME core-shell MnFe2O4@Ba0.8Ca0.15Zr0.1Ti0.9O3 NPs (22 ± 4 nm) prepared using microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis with tailored structure and phase composition of a thin epitaxial BCZT shell (2-6 nm). Enhanced ME response and superior wireless neurostimulation performance under a low-intensity alternating magnetic field (AMF) (0-6 mT, 50 Hz) were demonstrated. The increase in the synthesis temperature (from 185 to 225 °C), alkali concentration (from 2 to 10 M), and duration (from 1 to 6 h) reduced the orthorhombic phase content while the fractions of the tetragonal (up to 63 %) and trigonal (up to 37 %) phases were increased. A synthesis temperature of 185 °C produced NPs with a partially amorphous shell and a trace Ba1.12Ti8O16-δ phase. This phase was absent in other ME NPs synthesized by reducing alkali content or reaction time. These specific structural changes, caused by the reduced synthesis temperature (185 °C), led to a drastic enhancement of the effective piezoelectric performance (18.25 ± 7.32 pm·V−1) and a more than threefold increase in the ME response (1.8 × 106 mV cm−1 Oe−1), ranking among the highest values reported for ME NPs. Consequently, neurons treated with NPs synthesized at 185 °C showed an ∼20% increase in the population of stimulated hippocampal neurons and a more than threefold enhancement in AMF-driven Ca2+ influx compared to those treated with NPs synthesized at 225 °C. Thus, the present work conclusively establishes MFO@BCZT as a validated proof-of-concept platform for magneto-neural interfacing, with a clear pathway for efficacy optimization through synthetic refinement 
336 |a Текстовый файл 
371 0 |a AM_Agreement 
461 1 |t Ceramics International  |c Oxford  |n Elsevier Ltd 
463 1 |t Vol. 52, iss. 13, pt. A  |v P. 21968-21987  |d 2026 
610 1 |a Magnetoelectrics 
610 1 |a Core-shell nanoparticles 
610 1 |a Hydrothermal synthesis 
610 1 |a Biomaterials 
610 1 |a Electrostimulation 
610 1 |a Deep brain stimulation 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
701 1 |a Koptsev  |b D. A.  |c specialist in the field of material science  |c Laboratory assistant of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 2003-  |g Danila Andreevich  |9 88597 
701 1 |a Chernozem  |b P. V.  |c specialist in the field of informatics and computer technology  |c Research Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1997-  |g Polina Viktorovna  |9 22733 
701 1 |a Urakova  |b A. O.  |c specialist in the field of material science  |c Laboratory assistant of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 2002-  |g Alina Olegovna  |9 88596 
701 1 |a Lisitsyn  |b S. A.  |g Sergey Aleksandrovich 
701 1 |a Vagner (Wagner)  |b D. V.  |c physicist  |c Senior Researcher of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of technical sciences  |f 1990-  |g Dmitry Viktorovich  |9 89321 
701 1 |a Kozadayeva  |b M.  |c chemist  |c engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1998-  |g Maria  |9 22899 
701 1 |a Baksheev  |b A. I.  |c specialist in the field of material science  |c Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 2003-  |g Artem Igorevich  |9 89324 
701 1 |a Surmeneva  |b M. A.  |c specialist in the field of material science  |c engineer-researcher of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Associate Scientist  |f 1984-  |g Maria Alexandrovna  |9 15966 
701 1 |a Gerasimov  |b E. Yu.  |g Evgeny 
701 1 |a Amelina  |b K. A.  |g Kseniia 
701 1 |a Nosov  |b G. A.  |g Georgy 
701 1 |a Kazakova  |b L. I.  |g Lyubov 
701 1 |a Sharapova  |b M. B.  |c Doctor  |c Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 2003-  |g Marina Borisovna  |9 89326 
701 1 |a Romashchenko  |b A. V.  |g Aleksandr Viktorovich  |f 1986-  |c biologist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of biological sciences  |9 88955 
701 1 |a Sukhorukov  |b G. B.  |c chemist  |c The Head of the Laboratory of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of physical and mathematical sciences  |f 1969-  |g Gleb Borisovich  |9 20271 
701 1 |a Surmenev  |b R. A.  |c physicist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Senior researcher, Candidate of physical and mathematical sciences  |f 1982-  |g Roman Anatolievich  |9 15957 
701 1 |a Chernozem  |b R. V.  |c physicist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1992-  |g Roman Viktorovich  |9 19499 
801 0 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20251013 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2026.03.266  |z https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2026.03.266 
942 |c CF