К вопросу о дисциплинарном статусе и предметной области терминологии: социально-философские основания и социолингвистический подход
| Parent link: | Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология.— .— Томск: Изд-во ТГУ № 78.— 2024.— С. 68-83 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Other Authors: | |
| Summary: | Заглавие с экрана Исследуется дисциплинарный статус и предметное поле терминологии с целью уточнения того, что включает в себя терминологическая работа и какие факторы оказывают на нее наибольшее влияние. Выделяется три общих подхода к оценке дисциплинарного статуса и предметной области терминологии. Каждый из подходов сталкивается с невозможностью в своих рамках учесть весь междисциплинарный спектр терминологической деятельности и требует поиска более широких оснований. В качестве таких оснований авторы предлагают социально-философские основания как базу для интеграции социальных, лингвистических, профессиональных и собственно терминологических аспектов последней. Авторы полагают, что социальнофилософские основания позволяют терминологии функционировать как междисциплинарная и трансдисциплинарная сферы деятельности и применять социолингвистическую методологию. Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов The disciplinary status and subject field of terminology are examined in order to clarify what terminological work includes and what factors have the greatest influence on it. Despite the apparent simplicity of the problem posed, the authors are forced to admit that in the philosophical, scientific, professional literature there is no unambiguous answer to this question and, most likely, there will never be one, since the subject field of terminology is an unlimited space containing a large number of different scientific disciplines, professional areas and philosophical approaches; that each author, school, approach has its own specific view on solving a given problem. The authors identify three general approaches to assessing the disciplinary status and subject area of terminology in order to demonstrate the openness of each approach and the impossibility of limiting oneself to its own framework when organizing terminological work. The first approach understands terminology as a special area within any scientific or professional field, where every member of the scientific or professional community deals with issues of terminology. At the same time, he studies not so much specifically (professionally), but automatically, since he is simply forced to use linguistic means denoting the conceptual aspects of his own field of knowledge. The second approach considers terminology as a linguistic sphere, or more precisely, such an area as lexicology (lexicography). The linguistic component within the framework of this approach is presented professionally in terminology and terminological work, but linguists (lexicologists) are not specialists in the field of conceptual content of the subject area. The third approach presents terminology as a separate field of activity associated with the selection of terms from a particular field for the compilation of dictionaries, reference books, databases and knowledge bases within one national language, or within different languages. The key here seems to be the achievement of standardization of terminology within both one language and different languages. In this case, terminologists are neither linguists (lexicologists) nor representatives of professional (conceptual) fields. An analysis of each of the approaches demonstrates that each of the approaches faces the impossibility of taking into account the entire interdisciplinary range of terminological activities within its framework and requires a search for broader grounds. As such foundations, the authors propose socio-philosophical foundations as a basis for integrating the social, linguistic, professional, and terminological aspects of terminology. The choice is not completely obvious, but the authors give three justifications. The first justification is that socio-philosophical knowledge includes information about the genesis of society and the prospects for its development. The second is the importance of the axiological component in the activities of any community as a fundamental principle, which will influence any aspects of the life of society, including terminology. The third is the influence of social factors on semantic processes, conceptualized within the framework of analytic philosophy. When accepting socio-philosophical foundations as the basis for the integration of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary knowledge in the process of terminological activity, it becomes inevitable to use the methodology of a sociolinguistic approach in terminology, taking into account the interdependence of social and linguistic (terminological) changes.Thus, the authors believe that the socio-philosophical foundations of terminology allow terminology to function as an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary field of activity and apply sociolinguistic methodology. The authors declare no conflicts of interests Текстовый файл |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=67218011 |
| Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=680321 |