Констелляция факта в контексте философских концепций Л. Витгенштейна и К. Поппера
| Parent link: | Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология/ Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет (ТГУ) № 55.— 2020.— [С. 109-117] |
|---|---|
| Glavni avtor: | |
| Izvleček: | Заглавие с экрана Осуществлен сравнительный анализ теории фальсификации К. Поппера и теории значения Л. Витгенштейна в контексте историко-философского подхода к проблеме формирования нового знания и его обоснования. Представлена аргументация того, что появление какого-либо эпистемологического поля определено констелляцией факта. Использованы аргументы, касающиеся обоих философских периодов Л. Витгенштейна. The article compares Popper’s falsifiability theory and Wittgenstein’s theory of meaning in the context of the historical and philosophical approach to the problem of the formation of new knowledge and its justification. The argument is presented that the formation of any epistemological field is determined by a constellation of fact. The article uses arguments relating to Wittgenstein’s both philosophical periods. The main object of study in this article is the significance of the linguistic factor in the formation of new aspects of vision (in scientific, metaphysical systems, etc.). The working hypothesis is as follows: a comparative analysis of the concept of Wittgenstein’s meaning and the concept of Popper’s falsifiability shows that new epistemological fields are formed as a result of one or another constellation of fact; one of the main reasons for this state of affairs is the linguistic factor that determines the correlations between the reality of individual consciousness and reality. The aim of this study is to justify the thesis, according to which different types of discourses provide for the possibility of using various bases of reliability. In addition, for a detailed analysis of the problem, it is extremely important to consider the formation of new knowledge as one of the results of the multifunctional activity of the cognizing subject of knowledge in the context of Wittgenstein’s theory of meaning and Popper’s theory of falsifiability. |
| Jezik: | ruščina |
| Izdano: |
2020
|
| Teme: | |
| Online dostop: | https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/55/12 |
| Format: | Elektronski Book Chapter |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=662979 |