Reliability assessment of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing for impact damage of CFRP panels

Bibliographic Details
Parent link:NDT & E International
Vol. 102.— 2018.— [P. 77-83]
Corporate Author: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Инженерная школа неразрушающего контроля и безопасности Центр промышленной томографии Научно-производственная лаборатория "Тепловой контроль"
Other Authors: Duan Yuxia, Zhang Hai, Maldague X. Xavier, Ibarra-Castanedo C. Clemente, Servais P. Pierre, Genest M. Marc, Sfarra S. Stefano, Meng J. Jianqiao
Summary:Title screen
In order to quantitatively compare the reliability of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing techniques, a set of thirty-five Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) composite panels with impact damages are inspected by pulsed thermography and ultrasonic C-scan. The comparative experimental results and Probability of Detection (PoD) analysis results are presented. The quantitative comparison shows that pulsed thermography testing has smaller defect size at 90% PoD with 95% confidence level, i.e. a90/95 values than ultrasonic testing for the parameters and setup used in the inspections of these thirty-five CFRP composite panels.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.010
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=659700