Comparative evaluation of the sand blasting, acid etching and electron beam surface treatments of titanium for medical application

Bibliographic Details
Parent link:11th International Forum on Strategic Technology (IFOST 2016): 1-3 June 2016, Novosibirsk, Russiain/ Novosibirsk State Technical University.— , 2016
Pt. 1.— 2016.— [P. 69-72]
Corporate Authors: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Физико-технический институт (ФТИ) Кафедра теоретической и экспериментальной физики (ТиЭФ) Центр технологий (ЦТ), Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Управление проректора по научной работе и инновациям (НРиИ) Центр RASA в Томске Лаборатория новых лекарственных форм (Лаб. НЛФ)
Other Authors: Grubova I. Yu. Irina Yurievna, Chudinova E. A. Ekaterina Aleksandrovna, Surmeneva M. A. Maria Alexandrovna, Surmenev R. A. Roman Anatolievich, Ivanova A. A. Anna Aleksandrovna, Shugurov V., Teresov A., Koval N., Kravchuk K., Prymak O., Epple M.
Summary:Title screen
Modification of the surface topography and chemistry are commonly used to achieve the desired biological response to the implants. The influence of the different treatment methods on the physicochemical and mechanical properties of titanium is reported. All samples were divided into 2 groups. First group was sandblasted with 250-320 [mu]m Al[2]O[3] at two pressures 0.45 MPa and 0.61 MPa followed by the chemical etching in a fluorine-containing solution. The second group was acid-etched in the same solution followed by electron beam modification with the energy density 8 J/cm{2}. The samples were investigated by SEM, EDX, XRD, nanoindentation and sessile drop method. The studies revealed that all groups have nano/micro-patterned surfaces. The EDX analysis detected only titanium in all groups. The XRD results revealed the presence of diffraction peaks corresponding to titanium. The nanoindentation studies revealed significant differences in the mechanical properties between group 1 and 2. The elastic strain to failure and plastic deformation resistance of the group 2 were determined to be 0.035 and 5*10{-3}, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of group 1. The obtained results of water contact angle for group 1 revealed moderately hydrophilic properties of treated surfaces. The water contact angle was increased up to 80.85 ± 8.3 ° for group 2.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
Published: 2016
Series:New materials and nanotechnologies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IFOST.2016.7884191
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=654572