Функционирование дискурсивных маркеров в научном тексте: этнокультурные и дискурсивные детерминации
| Parent link: | Вестник Томского государственного университета. Филология/ Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет (ТГУ).— , 2007- № 1 (39).— 2016.— [С. 62-79] |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Corporate Author: | |
| Other Authors: | |
| Summary: | Заглавие с экрана В статье решается проблема выявления роли этноязыковых и дискурсивных факторов, определяющих направленность функционирования дискурсивных единиц в научном тексте. Проблема решается на материале научных текстов, относящихся к различным этноязыковым системам и разным тематическим субдискурсам. Результаты анализа свидетельствуют о специфических способах представления научного знания в разных научных дисциплинах и о влиянии на данное своеобразие этноязыковой модели организации научного дискурса. Language units of the academic text show dependence on the general conditions of discourse functioning. In academic discourse, some linguistic units perform their basic, informative function, other units, discourse markers, form a system that helps build basic communication and control it, i.e., perform support functions, e.g., providing a connection between individual segments of the academic text. The analysis of the functional types of discourse markers in academic discourse texts shows a significant opposition of three types of discourse markers functionally correlated with the three basic elements of communication: the speaker, the listener, the subject of the message: 1) markers that ensure text coherence; 2) markers that convey the speaker's attitude to the message; 3) markers that reflect the interaction of the speaker and the listener. This paper focuses on the various aspects of the unity / variability of academic communication, the originality of styles of academic thinking, features of the concept spheres of respective cultures and languages hindering understanding between scholars and, as a reflection of these aspects of academic knowledge and communication, the uniqueness of text structures, the specific organization of their surface structures. A clear indicator of the originality of academic thinking styles is discursive markers of the text, which are not only the "technical means" that structure the text ensuring its coherence and consistency, but also units that allow understanding the scholar's thinking style and communicative stereotypes, constituting a significant aspect of the academic picture of the world. However, trends in the use of discourse markers may be due to individual differences in discursive goal-setting, to the specifics of the standard discourse topics. Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journals.tsu.ru/philology/&journal_page=archive&id=1355&article_id=25935 http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25501289 |
| Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=646941 |