Philosophical Interpretation of the Visuality Regime: Convergence of Culture Practices, Conventions, and Experience; Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences; Vol. 166 : Proceedings of The International Conference on Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences 2014 (RPTSS-2014), 16–18 October 2014, Tomsk, Russia

Bibliografische gegevens
Parent link:Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Vol. 166 : Proceedings of The International Conference on Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences 2014 (RPTSS-2014), 16–18 October 2014, Tomsk, Russia.— 2015.— [P. 552-556]
Coauteurs: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ) Кафедра культурологии и социальной коммуникации (КТЛ), Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ) Кафедра иностранных языков (ИЯСГТ)
Andere auteurs: Kolodiy N. A. Nataliya Andreevna, Kolodiy V. V. Vyacheslav Vladimirovich, Chaika (Chayka) Yu. A. Yuliya Aleksandrovna, Goncharova N. A. Natalya Aleksandrovna
Samenvatting:Title screen
This work is devoted to the importance of the visual turn in the modern society, and to the fact, that the visual turn has drawn attention to the variety of existing scopic regimes and to the system of factors changing them. It deals with the nature of a contemporary dominant scopic regime in our society and gives the definition of scopic regime or, as it is also called, the regime of seeing. In order to get a broad picture on this issue, we are going to create the typology for analyses of scopic regime, where three main groups of approaches can be distinguished: phenomenological, psychoanalytical, post-structuralist and synthetic. The second part of the research will be focused primarily on the vision practice of the twenties of XX century. The implicit aim of the work is to create some kind of typology of scopic regimes, existing in the Soviet and the post-Soviet space, and to define the origins of these regimes. The highlight of the research is to reconstruct the local context of the visual experience description and the scopic regime at the modern age. In order to identify the basis for any scopic regime, the work makes several conceptual assumptions underlying the basic conclusions on this issue.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
Taal:Engels
Gepubliceerd in: 2015
Onderwerpen:
Online toegang:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.571
http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/35447
Formaat: Elektronisch Hoofdstuk
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=638888

MARC

LEADER 00000nla2a2200000 4500
001 638888
005 20251224134319.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\3285 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\3279 
090 |a 638888 
100 |a 20150216a2015 k y0engy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
105 |a y z 100zy 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Philosophical Interpretation of the Visuality Regime: Convergence of Culture Practices, Conventions, and Experience  |f N. A. Kolodiy [et al.]  
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: р. 556 (15 tit.)] 
330 |a This work is devoted to the importance of the visual turn in the modern society, and to the fact, that the visual turn has drawn attention to the variety of existing scopic regimes and to the system of factors changing them. It deals with the nature of a contemporary dominant scopic regime in our society and gives the definition of scopic regime or, as it is also called, the regime of seeing. In order to get a broad picture on this issue, we are going to create the typology for analyses of scopic regime, where three main groups of approaches can be distinguished: phenomenological, psychoanalytical, post-structuralist and synthetic. The second part of the research will be focused primarily on the vision practice of the twenties of XX century. The implicit aim of the work is to create some kind of typology of scopic regimes, existing in the Soviet and the post-Soviet space, and to define the origins of these regimes. The highlight of the research is to reconstruct the local context of the visual experience description and the scopic regime at the modern age. In order to identify the basis for any scopic regime, the work makes several conceptual assumptions underlying the basic conclusions on this issue. 
333 |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса 
461 0 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\2898  |t Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 
463 0 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\2900  |t Vol. 166 : Proceedings of The International Conference on Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences 2014 (RPTSS-2014), 16–18 October 2014, Tomsk, Russia  |f National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU)  |v [P. 552-556]  |d 2015 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a regime of visuality 
610 1 |a scopic regime 
610 1 |a cultural practices 
610 1 |a the visual turn 
610 1 |a visual matrix 
610 1 |a imaginary 
610 1 |a symbolic 
610 1 |a визуальность 
610 1 |a визуальный поворот 
610 1 |a конвергенция 
610 1 |a современное общество 
701 1 |a Kolodiy  |b N. A.  |c specialist in the field of cultural studies and social communication  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of philosophical sciences  |f 1958-  |g Nataliya Andreevna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31367  |9 15539 
701 1 |a Kolodiy  |b V. V.  |c specialist in the field of cultural studies and social communication  |c senior lecturer of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of philosophical sciences  |f 1984-  |g Vyacheslav Vladimirovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33611 
701 1 |a Chaika (Chayka)  |b Yu. A.  |c linguist  |c Senior Lecturer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1980-  |g Yuliya Aleksandrovna  |y Tomsk  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\30979  |9 15216 
701 1 |a Goncharova  |b N. A.  |c specialist in the field of culture studies and social communication  |c senior lecturer at the Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1981-  |g Natalya Aleksandrovna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\32546  |9 16468 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ)  |b Кафедра культурологии и социальной коммуникации (КТЛ)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18374 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ)  |b Кафедра иностранных языков (ИЯСГТ)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18376 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20161227  |g RCR 
856 4 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.571 
856 4 |u http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/35447 
942 |c CF