Philosophical Interpretation of the Visuality Regime: Convergence of Culture Practices, Conventions, and Experience
| Parent link: | Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Vol. 166 : Proceedings of The International Conference on Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences 2014 (RPTSS-2014), 16–18 October 2014, Tomsk, Russia.— 2015.— [P. 552-556] |
|---|---|
| Corporate Authors: | , |
| Other Authors: | , , , |
| Summary: | Title screen This work is devoted to the importance of the visual turn in the modern society, and to the fact, that the visual turn has drawn attention to the variety of existing scopic regimes and to the system of factors changing them. It deals with the nature of a contemporary dominant scopic regime in our society and gives the definition of scopic regime or, as it is also called, the regime of seeing. In order to get a broad picture on this issue, we are going to create the typology for analyses of scopic regime, where three main groups of approaches can be distinguished: phenomenological, psychoanalytical, post-structuralist and synthetic. The second part of the research will be focused primarily on the vision practice of the twenties of XX century. The implicit aim of the work is to create some kind of typology of scopic regimes, existing in the Soviet and the post-Soviet space, and to define the origins of these regimes. The highlight of the research is to reconstruct the local context of the visual experience description and the scopic regime at the modern age. In order to identify the basis for any scopic regime, the work makes several conceptual assumptions underlying the basic conclusions on this issue. Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса |
| Published: |
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.571 http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/35447 |
| Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=638888 |