Philosophical Interpretation of the Visuality Regime: Convergence of Culture Practices, Conventions, and Experience; Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences; Vol. 166 : Proceedings of The International Conference on Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences 2014 (RPTSS-2014), 16–18 October 2014, Tomsk, Russia

Podrobná bibliografie
Parent link:Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Vol. 166 : Proceedings of The International Conference on Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences 2014 (RPTSS-2014), 16–18 October 2014, Tomsk, Russia.— 2015.— [P. 552-556]
Korporace: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ) Кафедра культурологии и социальной коммуникации (КТЛ), Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ) Кафедра иностранных языков (ИЯСГТ)
Další autoři: Kolodiy N. A. Nataliya Andreevna, Kolodiy V. V. Vyacheslav Vladimirovich, Chaika (Chayka) Yu. A. Yuliya Aleksandrovna, Goncharova N. A. Natalya Aleksandrovna
Shrnutí:Title screen
This work is devoted to the importance of the visual turn in the modern society, and to the fact, that the visual turn has drawn attention to the variety of existing scopic regimes and to the system of factors changing them. It deals with the nature of a contemporary dominant scopic regime in our society and gives the definition of scopic regime or, as it is also called, the regime of seeing. In order to get a broad picture on this issue, we are going to create the typology for analyses of scopic regime, where three main groups of approaches can be distinguished: phenomenological, psychoanalytical, post-structuralist and synthetic. The second part of the research will be focused primarily on the vision practice of the twenties of XX century. The implicit aim of the work is to create some kind of typology of scopic regimes, existing in the Soviet and the post-Soviet space, and to define the origins of these regimes. The highlight of the research is to reconstruct the local context of the visual experience description and the scopic regime at the modern age. In order to identify the basis for any scopic regime, the work makes several conceptual assumptions underlying the basic conclusions on this issue.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: 2015
Témata:
On-line přístup:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.571
http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/35447
Médium: Elektronický zdroj Kapitola
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=638888
Popis
Shrnutí:Title screen
This work is devoted to the importance of the visual turn in the modern society, and to the fact, that the visual turn has drawn attention to the variety of existing scopic regimes and to the system of factors changing them. It deals with the nature of a contemporary dominant scopic regime in our society and gives the definition of scopic regime or, as it is also called, the regime of seeing. In order to get a broad picture on this issue, we are going to create the typology for analyses of scopic regime, where three main groups of approaches can be distinguished: phenomenological, psychoanalytical, post-structuralist and synthetic. The second part of the research will be focused primarily on the vision practice of the twenties of XX century. The implicit aim of the work is to create some kind of typology of scopic regimes, existing in the Soviet and the post-Soviet space, and to define the origins of these regimes. The highlight of the research is to reconstruct the local context of the visual experience description and the scopic regime at the modern age. In order to identify the basis for any scopic regime, the work makes several conceptual assumptions underlying the basic conclusions on this issue.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.571