Making Good Law or Good Policy? The Causes and Effects of State Supreme Court Judges’ Role Orientations /

Chi tiết về thư mục
Tác giả chính: Carman, Raymond V. (Tác giả)
Tác giả của công ty: SpringerLink (Online service)
Tóm tắt:VIII, 140 p. 4 illus.
text
Ngôn ngữ:Tiếng Anh
Được phát hành: Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer, 2017.
Phiên bản:1st ed. 2017.
Những chủ đề:
Truy cập trực tuyến:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53381-0
Định dạng: Điện tử Sách

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000005i 4500
001 978-3-319-53381-0
003 DE-He213
005 20230810191207.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 170307s2017 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9783319533810  |9 978-3-319-53381-0 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-3-319-53381-0  |2 doi 
050 4 |a JK1-9993 
050 4 |a JL1-3899 
072 7 |a JP  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a 1K  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a POL040000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a JP  |x 1K  |2 thema 
082 0 4 |a 320.9  |2 23 
100 1 |a Carman, Raymond V.  |e author.  |4 aut  |4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 
245 1 0 |a Making Good Law or Good Policy?  |h [electronic resource] :  |b The Causes and Effects of State Supreme Court Judges’ Role Orientations /  |c by Raymond V. Carman. 
250 |a 1st ed. 2017. 
264 1 |a Cham :  |b Springer International Publishing :  |b Imprint: Springer,  |c 2017. 
300 |a VIII, 140 p. 4 illus.  |b online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
505 0 |a 1. An Empirical Puzzle -- 2. Role Theoretic Literature and a Judicial Role Theoretic Framework -- 3. Survey Design and Survey Results -- 4. Determining the Causes of Role Orientation -- 5. Role Orientation's Effect on Role Behavior -- 6. Conclusion. 
520 |a This book uses role theory to analyze the judicial decisions made by state supreme court judges. Grounded in the fields of anthropology, business management, psychology, and sociology, role theory holds that, for each position an individual occupies in society, he or she creates a role orientation, or a belief about the limits of proper behavior. Judicial role orientation is conceptualized as the stimuli that a judge feels can legitimately be allowed to influence his or her decision-making and, in the case of conflict among influences, what priorities to assign to different decisional criteria. This role orientation is generally seen as existing on a spectrum ranging from activist to restraintist. Using multi-faceted data collection and empirical testing, this book discusses the variation in judges’ role orientations, the role that personal institutional structure and judges' backgrounds play in determining judicial orientations, and the degree to which judges’ orientations affect their decision-making. The first study to provide cross-institutional research on state supreme court judges, this book expands and advances the literature on judicial role orientation. As such, this book will be of interest to graduate students and researchers studying political science, public policy, law, and the courts. . 
650 0 |a America  |x Politics and government. 
650 0 |a Political planning. 
650 0 |a Constitutional law. 
650 0 |a Law  |x Philosophy. 
650 0 |a Law  |x History. 
650 1 4 |a American Politics. 
650 2 4 |a Public Policy. 
650 2 4 |a Constitutional Law. 
650 2 4 |a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
773 0 |t Springer Nature eBook 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783319533803 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783319533827 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783319851396 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53381-0 
912 |a ZDB-2-POS 
912 |a ZDB-2-SXPI 
950 |a Political Science and International Studies (SpringerNature-41174) 
950 |a Political Science and International Studies (R0) (SpringerNature-43724)