Debating Laws Studies on Parliamentary Justification of Legislation /

书目详细资料
企业作者: SpringerLink (Online service)
其他作者: Oliver-Lalana, A. Daniel (Editor)
总结:XVII, 316 p. 13 illus.
text
语言:英语
出版: Cham : Springer Nature Switzerland : Imprint: Springer, 2024.
版:1st ed. 2024.
丛编:Legisprudence Library, Studies on the Theory and Practice of Legislation, 10
主题:
在线阅读:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46727-1
格式: 电子 图书

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000005i 4500
001 978-3-031-46727-1
003 DE-He213
005 20250808090349.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 240101s2024 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9783031467271  |9 978-3-031-46727-1 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-3-031-46727-1  |2 doi 
050 4 |a K201-487 
050 4 |a K140-165 
072 7 |a LAB  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a LAW000000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAB  |2 thema 
082 0 4 |a 340.1  |2 23 
245 1 0 |a Debating Laws  |h [electronic resource] :  |b Studies on Parliamentary Justification of Legislation /  |c edited by A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana. 
250 |a 1st ed. 2024. 
264 1 |a Cham :  |b Springer Nature Switzerland :  |b Imprint: Springer,  |c 2024. 
300 |a XVII, 316 p. 13 illus.  |b online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
341 0 |b Table of contents navigation  |2 onix 
341 0 |b Single logical reading order  |2 onix 
341 0 |b Short alternative textual descriptions  |2 onix 
341 0 |b Use of color is not sole means of conveying information  |2 onix 
341 0 |b Use of high contrast between text and background color  |2 onix 
341 0 |b Next / Previous structural navigation  |2 onix 
341 0 |b All non-decorative content supports reading without sight  |2 onix 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
490 1 |a Legisprudence Library, Studies on the Theory and Practice of Legislation,  |x 2213-2856 ;  |v 10 
505 0 |a 1 Legislative Debates in Parliament as a Source of Statutory Justification. A Framework for Analysis and Evaluation -- 2 Was It Really ‘To No Avail’? The Legislative Deliberation on Underage Girls’ Access to Abortion in Spain -- 3 Legislative Debates on Death with Dignity and Euthanasia. An Approach to the Spanish Situation -- 4 Debating on the Rights of Crime Victims: A Legisprudential Examination of the Parliamentary Deliberation on the Spanish Victim Protection Act -- 5 Expelling, Discussing, and Throwing Values Out – The Parliamentary Debate on the Citizen Security Act and the ‘Push-backs’ at the Moroccan-Spanish Borders -- 6 Parliamentary Debate as a Source of Justification for the Combat against Gender Violence Act -- 7 Parliamentary Debates on Joint Custody Legislation -- 8 Parliamentary Debates on Bullfighting in Spain: Animals Lost in Translation? -- 9 Minimum Vital Income: A Legislative Debate from the ‘Participant-Observer’ Perspective -- 10 InterpretingFundamental Rights from the (Parliamentary) Bench. Notes on Constitutional Argumentation in Legislative Debates. 
520 |a This book seeks to explore the potential and actual value of parliamentary debates as a source of legislative justification. Drawing on a sample of recent Spanish legislation, the papers collected here analyse (critically) the rationale of several laws or legislative measures as it can be reconstructed from the respective parliamentary discussions. All issues covered have given rise to intense political, legal and social controversy: they range from the combat against gender violence, the legal status of bullfighting, the protection of crime victims and the so-called ‘push-backs’ at the border, to the regulation of euthanasia, the minimum living income, underage girls’ access to abortion, and joint child custody. The volume is organised into two main parts. The first group of case studies adopt a legisprudential perspective and examine parliamentary deliberations in the light of the theory and methodology of legislative justification; the contributions in the second part follow approaches that fall outside – but are largely compatible with –legisprudence, and deal with aspects such as the rhetorical strategies employed by MPs when debating bills, and the role of elected legislators as constitutional interpreters. 
532 8 |a Accessibility summary: This PDF does not fully comply with PDF/UA standards, but does feature limited screen reader support, described non-text content (images, graphs), bookmarks for easy navigation and searchable, selectable text. Users of assistive technologies may experience difficulty navigating or interpreting content in this document. We recognize the importance of accessibility, and we welcome queries about accessibility for any of our products. If you have a question or an access need, please get in touch with us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com. 
532 8 |a No reading system accessibility options actively disabled 
532 8 |a Publisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com 
650 0 |a Law  |x Philosophy. 
650 0 |a Law  |x History. 
650 0 |a Constitutional law. 
650 1 4 |a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. 
650 2 4 |a Constitutional Law. 
700 1 |a Oliver-Lalana, A. Daniel.  |e editor.  |4 edt  |4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
773 0 |t Springer Nature eBook 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783031467264 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783031467288 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783031467295 
830 0 |a Legisprudence Library, Studies on the Theory and Practice of Legislation,  |x 2213-2856 ;  |v 10 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46727-1 
912 |a ZDB-2-LCR 
912 |a ZDB-2-SXLC 
950 |a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177) 
950 |a Law and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)