Welfare Economics and Second-Best Theory A Distortion-Analysis Protocol for Economic-Efficiency Prediction /
| Tác giả chính: | |
|---|---|
| Tác giả của công ty: | |
| Tóm tắt: | XXIII, 356 p. 9 illus. text |
| Ngôn ngữ: | Tiếng Anh |
| Được phát hành: |
Cham :
Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer,
2020.
|
| Phiên bản: | 1st ed. 2020. |
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43360-4 |
| Định dạng: | Điện tử Sách |
Mục lục:
- Introduction to The General Theory of Second Best, Its Central Implications, and the Appropriate Way to Respond to It
- The Economics Profession’s Responses to The General Theory of Second Best: Descriptions and Critiques
- The Concept of “the Impact of a Choice (or Natural Event) on Economic Efficiency”
- “First-Best,” “Second-Best,” and “Third-Best” Definitions, Elaborations, and Other Economists’ Usages
- The Symbols for Various Pareto Imperfections, Private and Allocative Concepts, Categories of Resource-Uses, and Categories of Resource Allocations
- The Vocabulary and Symbols of Distortion Analysis
- Analyses of Various Step-Wise Monopoly Distortions
- The Various Non-Monopoly Step-Wise Private-Benefit, Private-Cost, and Profit Distortions
- Some Negative and Positive Implications of the TBLE Distortion-Analysis Protocol for Economic-Efficiency Prediction/Post-Diction
- The Approach That Would Be TBLE for a Government to Take to Economic-Efficiency Prediction/Post-diction—the Restof the Story
- Conclusion.