Science-Based Lawmaking How to Effectively Integrate Science in International Environmental Law /
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 企业作者: | |
| 总结: | XX, 419 p. 1 illus. text |
| 语言: | 英语 |
| 出版: |
Cham :
Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer,
2019.
|
| 版: | 1st ed. 2019. |
| 主题: | |
| 在线阅读: | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21417-3 |
| 格式: | 电子 电子书 |
书本目录:
- Introduction: Is Contemporary International Environmental Law Based on Science?
- Historical Background: What Are the Lessons Learnt from the Past and What Remains To Be Answered
- Part I
- Pathology of International Environmental Law
- Fragmentation of Science, International Environmental Law, and International Institutions
- Causes of Pathology
- Part II
- Normative Powers of the International Institutions with Environmental Competence
- Contemporary Lawmaking Processes and Progressive Lawmaking Processes That Bind the States Without Unanimous Vote
- Progressive Lawmaking Procedures in the Framework of International Institutions with Environmental Competence
- Normative Powers of Expert Bodies as Variables for Effective Environmental Governance
- Additional Theoretical Legal Bases for the Integration of Science in International Environmental Law Without Any Constitutional or Procedural Amendment
- Part III
- Democratic Governance and Public Accountability as Limitations to the Science-Based Lawmaking Model
- The Inherent Limits of the Science-Based Lawmaking Model
- Criticism Against the Delegation of Lawmaking Powers to Experts Based Upon Democratic Considerations
- Part IV
- “To Unite the Political Power with the Wisdom. . .”: The Decision-Making Model That Accepts Expertise as a Basis of Legitimacy
- Why Would States Obey Rules Issued by Expert Bodies?
- Science Expertise as a Legitimacy Basis for Lawmakingand Additional Bases of Legitimacy
- A New Modus Operandi for the International Institutions with Environmental Competence
- Part V
- Towards a Comprehensive Science-Based Lawmaking Model
- Conclusion.