Advances in underground gas storage: A review of current practices and future prospects; Petroleum; Vol. 12

Bibliographic Details
Parent link:Petroleum.— .— Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc.
Vol. 12.— 2026.— 93 p.
Corporate Author: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Инженерная школа природных ресурсов Отделение нефтегазового дела
Other Authors: Davoodi Sh. Shadfar, Al-Shargabi M. A. T. S. Mokhammed Abdulsalam Takha Sallam, Wood D. A. David, Thanh Hung Vo, Makarov N. S. Nikita Sergeevich, Podgaetsky M. V. Mikhail Vladimirovich
Summary:Title screen
Underground gas storage (UGS) plays a vital role in ensuring energy security and supporting the transition to a low-carbon energy future by enabling the large-scale storage of methane-rich natural gas (NG), carbon dioxide (CO2), and hydrogen (H2). However, the development and operation of UGS systems face complex technical, operational, and geological challenges across different storage environments. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of UGS technologies, focusing on their historical development, current status, and future prospects. The study examines the evolution of UGS applications, from traditional NG storage to the emerging roles of CO2 and H2 storage, highlighting shifting priorities in a decarbonizing energy landscape. A detailed evaluation of drilling and completion technologies is presented for various geological settings, including depleted gas reservoirs, salt caverns, and aquifers. The feasibility and performance of these formations for UGS are analyzed, considering repurposing strategies and the specific behaviors of NG, CO2, and H2 under subsurface conditions. Furthermore, this review compares UGS methods through the lens of trapping mechanisms. It also identifies the key technical challenges of well integrity, monitoring, and cyclic operations, and explores the use of simulations and intelligent models for predicting subsurface properties. A cost-benefit analysis of different UGS types is provided to support decision-making for future projects. The future outlook for UGS within a low-emissions energy system identifies research gaps and opportunities to guide further technological advancements
Текстовый файл
AM_Agreement
Language:English
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2026.04.017
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=688542

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 688542
005 20261013094250.0
090 |a 688542 
100 |a 20261013d2026 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a NL 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i   |b  e  
182 0 |a b 
183 0 |a cr  |2 RDAcarrier 
200 1 |a Advances in underground gas storage: A review of current practices and future prospects  |f Shadfar Davoodi, Mohammed Al-Shargabi, David A. Wood [et al.] 
203 |a Текст  |b визуальный  |c электронный 
283 |a online_resource  |2 RDAcarrier 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a References: 191 tit 
330 |a Underground gas storage (UGS) plays a vital role in ensuring energy security and supporting the transition to a low-carbon energy future by enabling the large-scale storage of methane-rich natural gas (NG), carbon dioxide (CO2), and hydrogen (H2). However, the development and operation of UGS systems face complex technical, operational, and geological challenges across different storage environments. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of UGS technologies, focusing on their historical development, current status, and future prospects. The study examines the evolution of UGS applications, from traditional NG storage to the emerging roles of CO2 and H2 storage, highlighting shifting priorities in a decarbonizing energy landscape. A detailed evaluation of drilling and completion technologies is presented for various geological settings, including depleted gas reservoirs, salt caverns, and aquifers. The feasibility and performance of these formations for UGS are analyzed, considering repurposing strategies and the specific behaviors of NG, CO2, and H2 under subsurface conditions. Furthermore, this review compares UGS methods through the lens of trapping mechanisms. It also identifies the key technical challenges of well integrity, monitoring, and cyclic operations, and explores the use of simulations and intelligent models for predicting subsurface properties. A cost-benefit analysis of different UGS types is provided to support decision-making for future projects. The future outlook for UGS within a low-emissions energy system identifies research gaps and opportunities to guide further technological advancements 
336 |a Текстовый файл 
371 0 |a AM_Agreement 
461 1 |t Petroleum  |c Amsterdam  |n Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc. 
463 1 |t Vol. 12  |v 93 p.  |d 2026 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a Underground gas storage (UGS) 
610 1 |a Evolution of UGS technologies 
610 1 |a Drilling and completion 
610 1 |a Depleted reservoirs 
610 1 |a Aquifers 
610 1 |a Salt caverns 
610 1 |a Low-carbon future 
610 1 |a UGS cost-benefit analysis 
701 1 |a Davoodi  |b Sh.  |c specialist in the field of petroleum engineering  |c Research Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1990-  |g Shadfar  |9 22200 
701 1 |a Al-Shargabi  |b M. A. T. S.  |c specialist in the field of petroleum engineering  |c Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1993-  |g Mokhammed Abdulsalam Takha Sallam  |9 22768 
701 1 |a Wood  |b D. A.  |g David 
701 0 |a Thanh Hung Vo 
701 1 |a Makarov  |b N. S.  |g Nikita Sergeevich  |f 1999-  |c specialist in the field of petroleum engineering  |c Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |9 88868 
701 1 |a Podgaetsky  |b M. V.  |g Mikhail Vladimirovich 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Инженерная школа природных ресурсов  |b Отделение нефтегазового дела  |c (2017- )  |9 28343 
801 0 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20261013 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2026.04.017  |z https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2026.04.017 
942 |c CF