Selective Cytogenetic Responses to Nano-Fertilizer Co-Exposure in Allium cepa L.: Implications for Sublethal Phytotoxicity in Agroecosystems; Journal of Xenobiotics; Vol. 16, iss. 3

Dades bibliogràfiques
Parent link:Journal of Xenobiotics.— .— Basel: MDPI AG
Vol. 16, iss. 3.— 2026.— Article number 71, 15 p.
Autor corporatiu: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Исследовательская школа химических и биомедицинских технологий
Altres autors: Torres-Bugarin O. Olivia, Sanchez-Gonzalez A. Alejandro, Ramos-Ibarra M. L. Maria Luisa, Castaneda-Yslas I. Ya. Idalia Yazmin, Bogdanchikova N. Nina, Pestryakov A. N. Aleksey Nikolaevich, Arellano-Garcia M. E. Maria Evarista
Sumari:Title screen
The intensive use of agricultural inputs and the increasing incorporation of nano-materials into crop management practices raise concerns about their ecotoxicological interactions in plant systems. This study evaluated phytotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and genotoxicity in Allium cepa L. under experimental nano-agrochemical exposure scenarios combining two conventional nitrogen fertilizers—ammonium sulfate (AS) and urea—with silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). Biological responses were assessed across fertilizer concentrations (0.03–0.5 g/L), applied individually, simultaneously, and sequentially, to identify modulatory effects of AgNPs on plant proliferative activity and genomic stability. Results showed the relative stability of morphophysiological indicators associated with root growth, whereas cytogenetic biomarkers exhibited selective alterations under specific conditions. Significant increases in genetic damage markers were detected at intermediate ammonium sulfate concentrations, suggesting sublethal phytotoxicity windows not reflected by macroscopic growth parameters. In addition, modulation of the mitotic index and absence of generalized genotoxic effects in most combined or sequential treatments indicate that AgNPs primarily acted as modulators of proliferative responses rather than direct cytotoxic agents. Overall, these findings highlight the dynamic and non-linear nature of nano-agrochemical interactions in plant systems and underscore the importance of multibiomarker approaches for the early detection of genomic instability. The results provide experimental evidence relevant to the environmental risk assessment of nano-enabled fertilization strategies under realistic mixed-exposure scenarios. This study contributes to advancing the ecotoxicological understanding of emerging agricultural technologies and supports the need for further mechanistic research and field-based evaluations to guide the safe and sustainable use of nanomaterials in crop production
Текстовый файл
Idioma:anglès
Publicat: 2026
Matèries:
Accés en línia:https://doi.org/10.3390/jox16030071
Format: Electrònic Capítol de llibre
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=688446

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 688446
005 20261008115219.0
090 |a 688446 
100 |a 20261008d2026 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a CH 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i   |b  e  
182 0 |a b 
183 0 |a cr  |2 RDAcarrier 
200 1 |a Selective Cytogenetic Responses to Nano-Fertilizer Co-Exposure in Allium cepa L.: Implications for Sublethal Phytotoxicity in Agroecosystems  |f O. Torres-Bugarin, A. Sanchez-Gonzalez, M. L. Ramos-Ibarra [et al.] 
203 |a Текст  |b визуальный  |c электронный 
283 |a online_resource  |2 RDAcarrier 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a References: 38 tit 
330 |a The intensive use of agricultural inputs and the increasing incorporation of nano-materials into crop management practices raise concerns about their ecotoxicological interactions in plant systems. This study evaluated phytotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and genotoxicity in Allium cepa L. under experimental nano-agrochemical exposure scenarios combining two conventional nitrogen fertilizers—ammonium sulfate (AS) and urea—with silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). Biological responses were assessed across fertilizer concentrations (0.03–0.5 g/L), applied individually, simultaneously, and sequentially, to identify modulatory effects of AgNPs on plant proliferative activity and genomic stability. Results showed the relative stability of morphophysiological indicators associated with root growth, whereas cytogenetic biomarkers exhibited selective alterations under specific conditions. Significant increases in genetic damage markers were detected at intermediate ammonium sulfate concentrations, suggesting sublethal phytotoxicity windows not reflected by macroscopic growth parameters. In addition, modulation of the mitotic index and absence of generalized genotoxic effects in most combined or sequential treatments indicate that AgNPs primarily acted as modulators of proliferative responses rather than direct cytotoxic agents. Overall, these findings highlight the dynamic and non-linear nature of nano-agrochemical interactions in plant systems and underscore the importance of multibiomarker approaches for the early detection of genomic instability. The results provide experimental evidence relevant to the environmental risk assessment of nano-enabled fertilization strategies under realistic mixed-exposure scenarios. This study contributes to advancing the ecotoxicological understanding of emerging agricultural technologies and supports the need for further mechanistic research and field-based evaluations to guide the safe and sustainable use of nanomaterials in crop production 
336 |a Текстовый файл 
461 1 |t Journal of Xenobiotics  |c Basel  |n MDPI AG 
463 1 |t Vol. 16, iss. 3  |v Article number 71, 15 p.  |d 2026 
610 1 |a nanoparticle–fertilizer interaction 
610 1 |a cytogenetic biomarkers 
610 1 |a sublethal stress 
610 1 |a hormetic response 
610 1 |a root meristem 
610 1 |a Allium test 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
701 1 |a Torres-Bugarin  |b O.  |g Olivia 
701 1 |a Sanchez-Gonzalez  |b A.  |g Alejandro 
701 1 |a Ramos-Ibarra  |b M. L.  |g Maria Luisa 
701 1 |a Castaneda-Yslas  |b I. Ya.  |g Idalia Yazmin 
701 1 |a Bogdanchikova  |b N.  |g Nina 
701 1 |a Pestryakov  |b A. N.  |c Chemist  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of Chemical Science  |f 1963-  |g Aleksey Nikolaevich  |9 14796 
701 1 |a Arellano-Garcia  |b M. E.  |g Maria Evarista 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Исследовательская школа химических и биомедицинских технологий  |c (2017- )  |9 28334 
801 0 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20261008 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/jox16030071  |z https://doi.org/10.3390/jox16030071 
942 |c CF