Comparative studies of preferential and weighted medians accuracy in robust estimation of central tendency; International Journal of Data Science and Analytics; Vol. 22
| Parent link: | International Journal of Data Science and Analytics.— .— Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland Vol. 22.— 2026.— Article number 262, 19 p. |
|---|---|
| Korporace: | , |
| Další autoři: | , , , |
| Shrnutí: | A central tendency estimation for a given sample of some physical quantity values is a standard data analysis procedure. The data can be considered as intervals whose midpoints are the values and lower and upper boundaries are their uncertainties that are not necessarily equal to each other. The classical weighted median (WM) and the newly proposed preferential median (PM), estimators of central tendency, were experimentally tested and studied on a set of specially generated random normally and uniformly distributed synthetic input interval data. The WM is a 50% weighted percentile. The PM is the highest rank value in a consensus ranking found, using a Borda preference aggregation rule, for the set of rankings of discrete values corresponding to the input intervals. Both estimators are known to be robust. Absolute deviations from a given nominal value, standard deviations using bootstrapping and the deviations critical values at given standard confidence levels of both estimators were calculated. For normal input data, it was shown that accuracy, robustness and confidence of WM and PM are practically similar. For uniform input data, the PM is on average from 15 to 18% more accurate and from 17 to 21% more robust; the PM has lower critical values compared to the WM at all confidence levels, e.g., by absolute deviation, the PM superiority is from 0 to 55% at confidence level 0.95. Текстовый файл AM_Agreement |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
2026
|
| Témata: | |
| On-line přístup: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-026-01222-6 |
| Médium: | Elektronický zdroj Kapitola |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=687843 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa0a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 687843 | ||
| 005 | 20260827111652.0 | ||
| 090 | |a 687843 | ||
| 100 | |a 20260827d2026 k||y0rusy50 ba | ||
| 101 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 102 | |a CH | ||
| 135 | |a drcn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | |a i |b e | |
| 182 | 0 | |a b | |
| 183 | 0 | |a cr |2 RDAcarrier | |
| 200 | 1 | |a Comparative studies of preferential and weighted medians accuracy in robust estimation of central tendency |f S. V. Muravyov, L. I. Khudonogova, V. S. Shabramov, V. D. Ignatyev | |
| 203 | |a Текст |c электронный |b визуальный | ||
| 283 | |a online_resource |2 RDAcarrier | ||
| 320 | |a References: 40 tit | ||
| 330 | |a A central tendency estimation for a given sample of some physical quantity values is a standard data analysis procedure. The data can be considered as intervals whose midpoints are the values and lower and upper boundaries are their uncertainties that are not necessarily equal to each other. The classical weighted median (WM) and the newly proposed preferential median (PM), estimators of central tendency, were experimentally tested and studied on a set of specially generated random normally and uniformly distributed synthetic input interval data. The WM is a 50% weighted percentile. The PM is the highest rank value in a consensus ranking found, using a Borda preference aggregation rule, for the set of rankings of discrete values corresponding to the input intervals. Both estimators are known to be robust. Absolute deviations from a given nominal value, standard deviations using bootstrapping and the deviations critical values at given standard confidence levels of both estimators were calculated. For normal input data, it was shown that accuracy, robustness and confidence of WM and PM are practically similar. For uniform input data, the PM is on average from 15 to 18% more accurate and from 17 to 21% more robust; the PM has lower critical values compared to the WM at all confidence levels, e.g., by absolute deviation, the PM superiority is from 0 to 55% at confidence level 0.95. | ||
| 336 | |a Текстовый файл | ||
| 371 | 0 | |a AM_Agreement | |
| 461 | 1 | |t International Journal of Data Science and Analytics |c Cham |n Springer Nature Switzerland | |
| 463 | 1 | |t Vol. 22 |v Article number 262, 19 p. |d 2026 | |
| 610 | 1 | |a Central tendency estimator | |
| 610 | 1 | |a Preferential median | |
| 610 | 1 | |a Weighted median | |
| 610 | 1 | |a Robustness | |
| 610 | 1 | |a Interval fusion with preference aggregation (IF&PA) | |
| 610 | 1 | |a электронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a труды учёных ТПУ | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Muravyov (Murav’ev) |b S. V. |c specialist in the field of control and measurement equipment |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University,Doctor of technical sciences |f 1954- |g Sergey Vasilyevich |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\39762 |9 15440 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Khudonogova |b L. I. |c specialist in the field of informatics and computer technology |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Technical Sciences |f 1989- |g Ludmila Igorevna |9 16741 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Shabramov |b V. S |c specialist in the field of informatics and computer technology |c programmer of Tomsk Polytechnic University |f 1999- |g Vladislav Sergeevich |9 89302 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Ignatyev |b V. D. |g Vadim | |
| 712 | 0 | 2 | |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет |b Инженерная школа информационных технологий и робототехники |c 2017- |9 28330 |
| 712 | 0 | 2 | |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет |b Инженерная школа Интеллектуальные энергетические систем |c 2022- |9 89346 |
| 801 | 0 | |a RU |b 63413507 |c 20260827 |g RCR | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-026-01222-6 |z https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-026-01222-6 |
| 942 | |c CF | ||