Emerging applications of physics-informed and physics-guided machine learning in geoenergy science: A review; Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation; Vol. 154

Detalles Bibliográficos
Parent link:Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation.— .— Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc.
Vol. 154.— 2026.— Article number 109551, 27 p.
Outros autores: Davoodi Sh. Shadfar, Wood D. A. David, Al-Shargabi M. A. T. S. Mokhammed Abdulsalam Takha Sallam, Vanovskiy V. Vladimir, Rukavishnikov V. S. Valery Sergeevich, Burnaev E. Evgeny
Summary:Title screen
The complexity and sustainability demands of geoenergy science (GS) systems necessitate predictive models that are both accurate and computationally efficient. Traditional numerical simulators, while physically rigorous, are often prohibitively expensive, whereas purely data-driven machine learning models lack interpretability and physical fidelity, especially under data scarcity. Physics-informed machine learning (PIML) bridges this gap by integrating deep learning with governing physical laws to deliver reliable, efficient, and interpretable predictions. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of PIML applications in GS, with emphasis on reservoir modeling, subsurface multiphase flow, thermal dynamics, and inter-well connectivity estimation. It critically evaluates core PIML paradigms, including physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), neural operators (NO), and physics-guided machine learning (PGML), across key domains: underground gas storage (natural gas, CO₂, and H₂), geothermal energy systems, and real-time reservoir optimization. The review highlights how PIML embeds conservation laws (e.g., mass, energy) to solve both forward and inverse problems, and assesses advances in uncertainty quantification, transfer learning, and multiscale hierarchical modeling. Real-world case studies and bibliometric trends illustrate practical deployment and emerging methodological directions. PIML offers the potential to provide robust, generalizable frameworks that enhance prediction performance, ensure physical consistency, and substantially reduce computational cost, even with sparse or noisy field data. The principal outcome of this review is that PIML enables generalizable, physics-compliant surrogate models that outperform conventional approaches. However, future work is required to prioritize scalable architectures, resilience to data noise, and tighter integration with downhole sensing to support autonomous, physics-guided decision-making in the next-generation of GS operations
Текстовый файл
AM_Agreement
Idioma:inglés
Publicado: 2026
Subjects:
Acceso en liña:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2025.109551
Formato: Electrónico Capítulo de libro
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=687153

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 687153
005 20260629135953.0
090 |a 687153 
100 |a 20260629d2026 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a NL 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i   |b  e  
182 0 |a b 
183 0 |a cr  |2 RDAcarrier 
200 1 |a Emerging applications of physics-informed and physics-guided machine learning in geoenergy science: A review  |f Shadfar Davoodi, David A. Wood, Mohammed Al-Shargabi [et al.] 
203 |a Текст  |b визуальный  |c электронный 
283 |a online_resource  |2 RDAcarrier 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a References: 106 tit 
330 |a The complexity and sustainability demands of geoenergy science (GS) systems necessitate predictive models that are both accurate and computationally efficient. Traditional numerical simulators, while physically rigorous, are often prohibitively expensive, whereas purely data-driven machine learning models lack interpretability and physical fidelity, especially under data scarcity. Physics-informed machine learning (PIML) bridges this gap by integrating deep learning with governing physical laws to deliver reliable, efficient, and interpretable predictions. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of PIML applications in GS, with emphasis on reservoir modeling, subsurface multiphase flow, thermal dynamics, and inter-well connectivity estimation. It critically evaluates core PIML paradigms, including physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), neural operators (NO), and physics-guided machine learning (PGML), across key domains: underground gas storage (natural gas, CO₂, and H₂), geothermal energy systems, and real-time reservoir optimization. The review highlights how PIML embeds conservation laws (e.g., mass, energy) to solve both forward and inverse problems, and assesses advances in uncertainty quantification, transfer learning, and multiscale hierarchical modeling. Real-world case studies and bibliometric trends illustrate practical deployment and emerging methodological directions. PIML offers the potential to provide robust, generalizable frameworks that enhance prediction performance, ensure physical consistency, and substantially reduce computational cost, even with sparse or noisy field data. The principal outcome of this review is that PIML enables generalizable, physics-compliant surrogate models that outperform conventional approaches. However, future work is required to prioritize scalable architectures, resilience to data noise, and tighter integration with downhole sensing to support autonomous, physics-guided decision-making in the next-generation of GS operations 
336 |a Текстовый файл 
371 0 |a AM_Agreement 
461 1 |t Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation  |c Amsterdam  |n Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc. 
463 1 |t Vol. 154  |v Article number 109551, 27 p.  |d 2026 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a Physics-informed machine learning (PIML) 
610 1 |a Geoenergy science systems 
610 1 |a Underground gas storage 
610 1 |a Reservoir modeling 
610 1 |a Geothermal energy 
610 1 |a Uncertainty quantification 
701 1 |a Davoodi  |b Sh.  |c specialist in the field of petroleum engineering  |c Research Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1990-  |g Shadfar  |9 22200 
701 1 |a Wood  |b D. A.  |g David 
701 1 |a Al-Shargabi  |b M. A. T. S.  |c specialist in the field of petroleum engineering  |c Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1993-  |g Mokhammed Abdulsalam Takha Sallam  |9 22768 
701 1 |a Vanovskiy  |b V.  |g Vladimir 
701 1 |a Rukavishnikov  |b V. S.  |c Director of the Center for Training and Retraining of Oil and Gas Specialists, Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Technical Sciences  |c Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1984-  |g Valery Sergeevich  |9 17614 
701 1 |a Burnaev  |b E.  |g Evgeny 
801 0 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20260629 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2025.109551  |z https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2025.109551 
942 |c CF