Heat transfer processes at the gas hydrate plug dissociation; International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer; Vol. 256, pt. 1

Dades bibliogràfiques
Parent link:International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer.— .— Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc.
Vol. 256, pt. 1.— 2026.— Article number 127920, 18 p.
Altres autors: Podgornaya E. R. Elizaveta Romanovna, Nagibin P. S. Pavel Sergeevich, Shkola M. V. Mariya Valerjevna, Shlegel N. E. Nikita Evgenjevich, Strizhak P. A. Pavel Alexandrovich
Sumari:Title screen
Gas hydrate plugs are a serious problem in the operation of oil and gas pipelines. Existing methods for removing hydrate plugs are resource-consuming, unsafe and difficult to implement. This paper focused on methane hydrate dissociation by water, steam, and air injection into a pipeline. Additional experiments were performed to study hydrate blockage remediation by a heating cable system and by chemical inhibition. It was found that the rate of hydrate plug removal when using a water flow is approximately 1.4 times higher than with a steam flow, 11 times higher than with an air flow, 12 times higher than with methanol injection, and more then 200 times higher than with a heating cable. The experimental findings and patterns were generalized using dimensionless complexes to obtain unified mathematical expressions. These expressions can predict the effective conditions of heat and mass transfer to accelerate hydrate dissociation. Using multi-criteria analysis in terms of energy and economic efficiency, we propose recommendations and conceptual technological solutions to minimize the detrimental effect of hydrate plugging on oil and gas flow. Using an appropriate integrated approach, the conditions for the rational use of both individual and combined thermal stimulation techniques were determined
Текстовый файл
AM_Agreement
Idioma:anglès
Publicat: 2026
Matèries:
Accés en línia:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2025.127920
Format: Electrònic Capítol de llibre
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=685433

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 685433
005 20260312143022.0
090 |a 685433 
100 |a 20260312d2026 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a NL 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i   |b  e  
182 0 |a b 
183 0 |a cr  |2 RDAcarrier 
200 1 |a Heat transfer processes at the gas hydrate plug dissociation  |f E. R. Podgornaya, P. S. Nagibin, M. V. Shkola [et al.] 
203 |a Текст  |b визуальный  |c электронный 
283 |a online_resource  |2 RDAcarrier 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a References: 82 tit 
330 |a Gas hydrate plugs are a serious problem in the operation of oil and gas pipelines. Existing methods for removing hydrate plugs are resource-consuming, unsafe and difficult to implement. This paper focused on methane hydrate dissociation by water, steam, and air injection into a pipeline. Additional experiments were performed to study hydrate blockage remediation by a heating cable system and by chemical inhibition. It was found that the rate of hydrate plug removal when using a water flow is approximately 1.4 times higher than with a steam flow, 11 times higher than with an air flow, 12 times higher than with methanol injection, and more then 200 times higher than with a heating cable. The experimental findings and patterns were generalized using dimensionless complexes to obtain unified mathematical expressions. These expressions can predict the effective conditions of heat and mass transfer to accelerate hydrate dissociation. Using multi-criteria analysis in terms of energy and economic efficiency, we propose recommendations and conceptual technological solutions to minimize the detrimental effect of hydrate plugging on oil and gas flow. Using an appropriate integrated approach, the conditions for the rational use of both individual and combined thermal stimulation techniques were determined 
336 |a Текстовый файл 
371 0 |a AM_Agreement 
461 1 |t International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer  |c Amsterdam  |n Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc. 
463 1 |t Vol. 256, pt. 1  |v Article number 127920, 18 p.  |d 2026 
610 1 |a Gas hydrate 
610 1 |a Hydrate plug 
610 1 |a Pipeline 
610 1 |a Dissociation 
610 1 |a Thermal stimulation 
610 1 |a Multi-criteria analysis 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
701 1 |a Podgornaya  |b E. R.  |g Elizaveta Romanovna 
701 1 |a Nagibin  |b P. S.  |g Pavel Sergeevich 
701 1 |a Shkola  |b M. V.  |g Mariya Valerjevna 
701 1 |a Shlegel  |b N. E.  |c specialist in the field of heat and power engineering  |c Research Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1995-  |g Nikita Evgenjevich  |9 22331 
701 1 |a Strizhak  |b P. A.  |c Specialist in the field of heat power energy  |c Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences (DSc), Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU)  |f 1985-  |g Pavel Alexandrovich  |9 15117 
801 0 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20260312 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2025.127920  |z https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2025.127920 
942 |c CF