Comparative Assessment of the Reliability of Non-Recoverable Subsystems of Mining Electronic Equipment Using Various Computational Methods; Mathematics; Vol. 14, iss. 4

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Parent link:Mathematics.— .— Basel: MDPI AG
Vol. 14, iss. 4.— 2026.— Article number 723, 48 p.
Weitere Verfasser: Martyushev N. V. Nikita Vladimirovich, Malozemov B. V. Boris Vitaljevich, Demin A. Yu. Anton Yurievich, Pogrebnoy A. V. Aleksandr Vladimirovich, Kurdyumov G. E. Georgy Evgenjevich, Kondratjev V. V. Viktor Viktorovich, Karlina A. I. Antonina Igorevna
Zusammenfassung:Title screen
The assessment of reliability in non-repairable subsystems of mining electronic equipment represents a computationally challenging problem, particularly for complex and highly connected structures. This study presents a systematic comparative analysis of several deterministic approaches for reliability estimation, focusing on their computational efficiency, accuracy, and applicability. The investigated methods include classical boundary techniques (minimal paths and cuts), analytical decomposition based on the Bayes theorem, the logic–probabilistic method (LPM) employing triangle–star transformations, and the algorithmic Structure Convolution Method (SCM), which is based on matrix reduction of the system’s connectivity graph. The reliability problem is formally represented using graph theory, where each element is modeled as a binary variable with independent failures, which is a standard and practically justified assumption for power electronic subsystems operating without common-cause coupling. Numerical experiments were carried out on canonical benchmark topologies—bridge, tree, grid, and random connected graphs—representing different levels of structural complexity. The results demonstrate that the SCM achieves exact reliability values with up to six orders of magnitude acceleration compared to the LPM for systems containing more than 20 elements, while maintaining polynomial computational complexity. Qualitatively, the compared approaches differ in the nature of the output and practical applicability: boundary methods provide fast interval estimates suitable for preliminary screening, whereas decomposition may exhibit a systematic bias for highly connected (non-series–parallel) topologies. In contrast, the SCM consistently preserves exactness while remaining computationally tractable for medium and large sparse-to-moderately dense graphs, making it preferable for repeated recalculations in design and optimization workflows. The methods were implemented in Python 3.7 using NumPy and NetworkX, ensuring transparency and reproducibility. The findings confirm that the SCM is an efficient, scalable, and mathematically rigorous tool for reliability assessment and structural optimization of large-scale non-repairable systems. The presented methodology provides practical guidelines for selecting appropriate reliability evaluation techniques based on system complexity and computational resource constraints
Текстовый файл
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:https://doi.org/10.3390/math14040723
Format: Elektronisch Buchkapitel
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=685389

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 685389
005 20260311095922.0
090 |a 685389 
100 |a 20260311d2026 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a CH 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i   |b  e  
182 0 |a b 
183 0 |a cr  |2 RDAcarrier 
200 1 |a Comparative Assessment of the Reliability of Non-Recoverable Subsystems of Mining Electronic Equipment Using Various Computational Methods  |f N. V. Martyushev, B. V. Malozyomov, A. Y. Demin [et al.] 
203 |a Текст  |b визуальный  |c электронный 
283 |a online_resource  |2 RDAcarrier 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a References: 69 tit 
330 |a The assessment of reliability in non-repairable subsystems of mining electronic equipment represents a computationally challenging problem, particularly for complex and highly connected structures. This study presents a systematic comparative analysis of several deterministic approaches for reliability estimation, focusing on their computational efficiency, accuracy, and applicability. The investigated methods include classical boundary techniques (minimal paths and cuts), analytical decomposition based on the Bayes theorem, the logic–probabilistic method (LPM) employing triangle–star transformations, and the algorithmic Structure Convolution Method (SCM), which is based on matrix reduction of the system’s connectivity graph. The reliability problem is formally represented using graph theory, where each element is modeled as a binary variable with independent failures, which is a standard and practically justified assumption for power electronic subsystems operating without common-cause coupling. Numerical experiments were carried out on canonical benchmark topologies—bridge, tree, grid, and random connected graphs—representing different levels of structural complexity. The results demonstrate that the SCM achieves exact reliability values with up to six orders of magnitude acceleration compared to the LPM for systems containing more than 20 elements, while maintaining polynomial computational complexity. Qualitatively, the compared approaches differ in the nature of the output and practical applicability: boundary methods provide fast interval estimates suitable for preliminary screening, whereas decomposition may exhibit a systematic bias for highly connected (non-series–parallel) topologies. In contrast, the SCM consistently preserves exactness while remaining computationally tractable for medium and large sparse-to-moderately dense graphs, making it preferable for repeated recalculations in design and optimization workflows. The methods were implemented in Python 3.7 using NumPy and NetworkX, ensuring transparency and reproducibility. The findings confirm that the SCM is an efficient, scalable, and mathematically rigorous tool for reliability assessment and structural optimization of large-scale non-repairable systems. The presented methodology provides practical guidelines for selecting appropriate reliability evaluation techniques based on system complexity and computational resource constraints 
336 |a Текстовый файл 
461 1 |t Mathematics  |c Basel  |n MDPI AG 
463 1 |t Vol. 14, iss. 4  |v Article number 723, 48 p.  |d 2026 
610 1 |a reliability of systems 
610 1 |a non-recoverable systems 
610 1 |a minimal paths and sections 
610 1 |a logical–probabilistic method 
610 1 |a system structure convolution method 
610 1 |a mining electronics 
610 1 |a computational methods 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
701 1 |a Martyushev  |b N. V.  |c specialist in the field of material science  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of technical sciences  |f 1981-  |g Nikita Vladimirovich  |9 16754 
701 1 |a Malozemov  |b B. V.  |g Boris Vitaljevich 
701 1 |a Demin  |b A. Yu.  |c specialist in the field of Informatics and computer engineering  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, candidate of technical sciences  |f 1973-  |g Anton Yurievich  |9 17327 
701 1 |a Pogrebnoy  |b A. V.  |c specialist in the field of Informatics and computer engineering  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, candidate of technical sciences  |f 1973-  |g Aleksandr Vladimirovich  |9 17310 
701 1 |a Kurdyumov  |b G. E.  |g Georgy Evgenjevich 
701 1 |a Kondratjev  |b V. V.  |g Viktor Viktorovich 
701 1 |a Karlina  |b A. I.  |g Antonina Igorevna 
801 0 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20260311 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/math14040723  |z https://doi.org/10.3390/math14040723 
942 |c CF