Analysis of Digital Consumption Practices in Russian Regions Based on the Index Approach; Regional Research of Russia; Vol. 15, iss. 4

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Parent link:Regional Research of Russia.— .— New York: Springer Nature
Vol. 15, iss. 4.— 2026.— P. 720-731
Weitere Verfasser: Kashapova E. R. Elmira Ramisovna, Klemasheva E. I. Elena Igorevna, Malanina V. A. Veronika Anatolievna, Rozhdestvenskaya E. M. Elena Mikhailovna
Zusammenfassung:Title screen
The aim of the study is to provide an index assessment of the spread of digitalization of consumption practices among the Russian population by age and region. Most existing approaches to assessing digitalization take into account access to the necessary infrastructure, but do not fully answer the question of the demand for digital consumption practices among the population, taking into account the age characteristics of consumers, level of education and digital skills, health, and other factors. The design of the index of digitalization of consumption practices is proposed, including relevant indices organized into five subindices: medical services and services of social organizations; consumption of goods and services; digital communications; education; environment. The relative weights of the indices and domains were determined using expert assessments. The highest weighting factor is assigned to the subindex “consumption of goods and services.” The index values were calculated using data from the Comprehensive Monitoring of Living Conditions of the Population for 2022. High rates of digitalization of consumption practices were found in the presented age groups in the Chukotka Autonomous Okrug and St. Petersburg, while the lowest rates were found in Zabaykalsky krai. The largest gap in the digitalization of practices between the age categories under 55 and over 55 years is observed in Nizhny Novgorod oblast and the Republic of Tatarstan (0.187 and 0.178, respectively); the smallest, in the Chechen Republic, Chukotka Autonomous Okrug, and the republics of Dagestan and Kabardino-Balkaria. In terms of federal districts, the greatest difference between age groups is observed in the Central and Northwestern federal districts (0.196 and 0.174, respectively). The identified uneven development of digitalization of consumption practices by domain and age can contribute to focusing regional policy on identifying the reasons for the lack of prevalence of practices and smoothing out interregional differences in access to the necessary infrastructure, which corresponds to the level of research on regional digital inequality
Текстовый файл
AM_Agreement
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970525600751
Статья на русском языке
Format: Elektronisch Buchkapitel
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=685134

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 685134
005 20260224142716.0
090 |a 685134 
100 |a 20260224d2026 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a US 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i   |b  e  
182 0 |a b 
183 0 |a cr  |2 RDAcarrier 
200 1 |a Analysis of Digital Consumption Practices in Russian Regions Based on the Index Approach  |d Анализ цифровых практик потребления в регионах России на основе индексного подхода  |f E. R. Kashapova, E. I. Klemasheva, V. A. Malanina, E. M. Rozhdestvenskaya  |z rus 
203 |a Текст  |b визуальный  |c электронный 
283 |a online_resource  |2 RDAcarrier 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a References: 30 tit 
330 |a The aim of the study is to provide an index assessment of the spread of digitalization of consumption practices among the Russian population by age and region. Most existing approaches to assessing digitalization take into account access to the necessary infrastructure, but do not fully answer the question of the demand for digital consumption practices among the population, taking into account the age characteristics of consumers, level of education and digital skills, health, and other factors. The design of the index of digitalization of consumption practices is proposed, including relevant indices organized into five subindices: medical services and services of social organizations; consumption of goods and services; digital communications; education; environment. The relative weights of the indices and domains were determined using expert assessments. The highest weighting factor is assigned to the subindex “consumption of goods and services.” The index values were calculated using data from the Comprehensive Monitoring of Living Conditions of the Population for 2022. High rates of digitalization of consumption practices were found in the presented age groups in the Chukotka Autonomous Okrug and St. Petersburg, while the lowest rates were found in Zabaykalsky krai. The largest gap in the digitalization of practices between the age categories under 55 and over 55 years is observed in Nizhny Novgorod oblast and the Republic of Tatarstan (0.187 and 0.178, respectively); the smallest, in the Chechen Republic, Chukotka Autonomous Okrug, and the republics of Dagestan and Kabardino-Balkaria. In terms of federal districts, the greatest difference between age groups is observed in the Central and Northwestern federal districts (0.196 and 0.174, respectively). The identified uneven development of digitalization of consumption practices by domain and age can contribute to focusing regional policy on identifying the reasons for the lack of prevalence of practices and smoothing out interregional differences in access to the necessary infrastructure, which corresponds to the level of research on regional digital inequality 
336 |a Текстовый файл 
371 0 |a AM_Agreement 
461 1 |t Regional Research of Russia  |c New York  |n Springer Nature 
463 1 |t Vol. 15, iss. 4  |v P. 720-731  |d 2026 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a digital environment 
610 1 |a consumption 
610 1 |a digital practices 
610 1 |a spheres of life 
610 1 |a regions 
610 1 |a age groups 
610 1 |a index 
610 1 |a digital inequality 
701 1 |a Kashapova  |b E. R.  |c economist  |c senior lecturer at Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1988-  |g Elmira Ramisovna  |9 17075 
701 1 |a Klemasheva  |b E. I.  |c economist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Economic Sciences  |f 1988-  |g Elena Igorevna  |9 19487 
701 1 |a Malanina  |b V. A.  |c economist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of economic sciences  |f 1977-  |g Veronika Anatolievna  |9 18214 
701 1 |a Rozhdestvenskaya  |b E. M.  |c economist  |c Leading researcher of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of economic sciences  |f 1988-  |g Elena Mikhailovna  |9 20085 
801 0 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20260224 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970525600751  |z https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970525600751 
856 4 0 |u https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=82683178  |z Статья на русском языке 
942 |c CF