Predicting uniaxial compressive strength from drilling variables aided by hybrid machine learning; International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences; Vol. 170
| Parent link: | International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences.— .— Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc. Vol. 170.— 2023.— Article number 105546, 24 p. |
|---|---|
| Altri autori: | , , , , |
| Riassunto: | Title screen Awareness of uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) as a key rock formation parameter for the design and development of gas and oil field plays. It plays an essential role in the selection of the drill bits and stability of the wellbore’s wall. Precise prediction of UCS before or during the drilling, especially in exploration wellbores, is necessary to improve the drilling speed and reduce the instability of the wellbore walls. UCS predictor machine-learning (ML) models are developed in this study using drilling parameters recorded during drilling using least-squares support-vector machine (LSSVM) and multi-layer extreme learning machine (MELM) algorithms hybridized with cuckoo optimization algorithm (COA), particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algorithm (GA) optimizers. In addition, stand-alone LSSVM and convolutional neural network (CNN) models without optimizer enhancements are evaluated. Drilling and petrophysical data recorded for two wells (A and B) from the Rag-e-Safid oil field in southwest Iran were compiled to form the studied dataset. UCS was initially calculated numerically based on data from laboratory tests from petrophysical logs. The Well A dataset was pre-processed to remove outlying data records by applying the quantile regression algorithm. That analysis indicated that 9 data records should be removed from the Well A dataset. A decision tree model was employed for feature selection purposes to identify the more influential variables with respect to UCS. Depth, weight on the drill bit (WOB), drill-string rotation speed (RPM), rate of penetration (ROP), and torque (Trq) were the variables identified as being highly influential on UCS values. Application of the ML models on the training data subset (75% of Well A data records) revealed that the MELM-COA algorithm achieved the lowest root mean squared error (4.6945 MPa) and a higher coefficient of determination (0.9873) value than the other models when predicting UCS in the Well A training and validation data subsets. The Well-A-trained MELM-COA model confirmed its generalizability within the studied field by generating low UCS prediction errors when applied to the independent Well B testing dataset Текстовый файл AM_Agreement |
| Lingua: | inglese |
| Pubblicazione: |
2023
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2023.105546 |
| Natura: | Elettronico Capitolo di libro |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=684908 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa0a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 684908 | ||
| 005 | 20260216111549.0 | ||
| 090 | |a 684908 | ||
| 100 | |a 20260216d2023 k||y0rusy50 ba | ||
| 101 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 102 | |a NL | ||
| 135 | |a drcn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | |a i |b e | |
| 182 | 0 | |a b | |
| 183 | 0 | |a cr |2 RDAcarrier | |
| 200 | 1 | |a Predicting uniaxial compressive strength from drilling variables aided by hybrid machine learning |f Shadfar Davoodi, Mohammad Mehrad, David A. Wood [et al.] | |
| 203 | |a Текст |b визуальный |c электронный | ||
| 283 | |a online_resource |2 RDAcarrier | ||
| 300 | |a Title screen | ||
| 320 | |a References: 74 tit | ||
| 330 | |a Awareness of uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) as a key rock formation parameter for the design and development of gas and oil field plays. It plays an essential role in the selection of the drill bits and stability of the wellbore’s wall. Precise prediction of UCS before or during the drilling, especially in exploration wellbores, is necessary to improve the drilling speed and reduce the instability of the wellbore walls. UCS predictor machine-learning (ML) models are developed in this study using drilling parameters recorded during drilling using least-squares support-vector machine (LSSVM) and multi-layer extreme learning machine (MELM) algorithms hybridized with cuckoo optimization algorithm (COA), particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algorithm (GA) optimizers. In addition, stand-alone LSSVM and convolutional neural network (CNN) models without optimizer enhancements are evaluated. Drilling and petrophysical data recorded for two wells (A and B) from the Rag-e-Safid oil field in southwest Iran were compiled to form the studied dataset. UCS was initially calculated numerically based on data from laboratory tests from petrophysical logs. The Well A dataset was pre-processed to remove outlying data records by applying the quantile regression algorithm. That analysis indicated that 9 data records should be removed from the Well A dataset. A decision tree model was employed for feature selection purposes to identify the more influential variables with respect to UCS. Depth, weight on the drill bit (WOB), drill-string rotation speed (RPM), rate of penetration (ROP), and torque (Trq) were the variables identified as being highly influential on UCS values. Application of the ML models on the training data subset (75% of Well A data records) revealed that the MELM-COA algorithm achieved the lowest root mean squared error (4.6945 MPa) and a higher coefficient of determination (0.9873) value than the other models when predicting UCS in the Well A training and validation data subsets. The Well-A-trained MELM-COA model confirmed its generalizability within the studied field by generating low UCS prediction errors when applied to the independent Well B testing dataset | ||
| 336 | |a Текстовый файл | ||
| 371 | 0 | |a AM_Agreement | |
| 461 | 1 | |t International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences |c Amsterdam |n Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc. | |
| 463 | 1 | |t Vol. 170 |v Article number 105546, 24 p. |d 2023 | |
| 610 | 1 | |a электронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a труды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | |a Rock strength | |
| 610 | 1 | |a Hybrid machine learning | |
| 610 | 1 | |a Stress-related drilling variables | |
| 610 | 1 | |a Outlier determination | |
| 610 | 1 | |a Feature selection | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Davoodi |b Sh. |c specialist in the field of petroleum engineering |c Research Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University |f 1990- |g Shadfar |9 22200 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Mehrad |b M. |g Mohammad | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Wood |b D. A. |g David | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Rukavishnikov |b V. S. |c Director of the Center for Training and Retraining of Oil and Gas Specialists, Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Technical Sciences |c Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University |f 1984- |g Valery Sergeevich |9 17614 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Bajolvand |b M. |g Mahdi | |
| 801 | 0 | |a RU |b 63413507 |c 20260216 | |
| 850 | |a 63413507 | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2023.105546 |z https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2023.105546 |
| 942 | |c CF | ||