Mixtures of diesel fuel and liquid bioadditives for boilers and engines: basic operational and energy indicators; Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy; Vol. 17, iss. 12

Dades bibliogràfiques
Parent link:Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.— .— Berlin: Springer Nature
Vol. 17, iss. 12.— 2025.— P. 7525-7554
Altres autors: Vershinina K. Yu. Kseniya Yurievna, Romanov D. S. Daniil Sergeevich, Dorokhov V. V. Vadim Valerjevich, Khomutov N. A. Nikita Andreevich, Strizhak P. A. Pavel Alexandrovich
Sumari:Title screen
Renewable fuels require extensive research because they have specific limitations for use in engines and industrial power generation systems. In this work, comprehensive tests were performed for 24 diesel-based fuels with liquid additives derived from seed oils and wood. Additives to commercial diesel fuel included FAMEs of distilled tall, rapeseed, camelina, waste cooking oils, as well as these oils in their original form. The share of the additive varied from 5 to 15%. The corrosion activity of mixed fuels was higher than that of diesel fuel—both the average corrosion rate and morphological changes in the surface of contacting materials increased. An increase in the proportion of all types of oils in diesel fuel led to a decrease in the maximum reaction rate. Among biodiesel additives, rapeseed oil FAME provided the conversion kinetics closest to diesel fuel. The best combustion performance in a laboratory furnace was demonstrated by mixtures with additives of FAMEs of distilled tall oil and rapeseed oil with a share of 10%. In particular, adding 10% distilled tall oil FAME provided an increase in the CO2/CO ratio by 2.6 times compared to diesel fuel. In engine tests, diesel fuel showed better combustion quality than all the tested blends. However, the blend “95% diesel fuel, 5% distilled tall oil FAME” was the closest to diesel fuel, having an 11% lower CO2/CO ratio at an idle mode. The integral fuel efficiency, calculated based on a combination of technological parameters and cost, decreased by 2–16% with an increase in the share of vegetable oil or its FAME from 5% to 15%. The most promising FAME concentration in diesel fuel is 5–10% that provides the efficiency comparable to diesel fuel, moderate cost increase and carbon footprint reduction
Текстовый файл
AM_Agreement
Idioma:anglès
Publicat: 2025
Matèries:
Accés en línia:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-025-03304-8
Format: xMaterials Electrònic Capítol de llibre
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=682688

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 682688
005 20260119095053.0
090 |a 682688 
100 |a 20251029d2025 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a DE 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i   |b  e  
182 0 |a b 
183 0 |a cr  |2 RDAcarrier 
200 1 |a Mixtures of diesel fuel and liquid bioadditives for boilers and engines: basic operational and energy indicators  |f Ksenia Vershinina, Daniil Romanov, Vadim Dorokhov [et al.] 
283 |a online_resource  |2 RDAcarrier 
300 |a Title screen 
330 |a Renewable fuels require extensive research because they have specific limitations for use in engines and industrial power generation systems. In this work, comprehensive tests were performed for 24 diesel-based fuels with liquid additives derived from seed oils and wood. Additives to commercial diesel fuel included FAMEs of distilled tall, rapeseed, camelina, waste cooking oils, as well as these oils in their original form. The share of the additive varied from 5 to 15%. The corrosion activity of mixed fuels was higher than that of diesel fuel—both the average corrosion rate and morphological changes in the surface of contacting materials increased. An increase in the proportion of all types of oils in diesel fuel led to a decrease in the maximum reaction rate. Among biodiesel additives, rapeseed oil FAME provided the conversion kinetics closest to diesel fuel. The best combustion performance in a laboratory furnace was demonstrated by mixtures with additives of FAMEs of distilled tall oil and rapeseed oil with a share of 10%. In particular, adding 10% distilled tall oil FAME provided an increase in the CO2/CO ratio by 2.6 times compared to diesel fuel. In engine tests, diesel fuel showed better combustion quality than all the tested blends. However, the blend “95% diesel fuel, 5% distilled tall oil FAME” was the closest to diesel fuel, having an 11% lower CO2/CO ratio at an idle mode. The integral fuel efficiency, calculated based on a combination of technological parameters and cost, decreased by 2–16% with an increase in the share of vegetable oil or its FAME from 5% to 15%. The most promising FAME concentration in diesel fuel is 5–10% that provides the efficiency comparable to diesel fuel, moderate cost increase and carbon footprint reduction 
336 |a Текстовый файл 
371 0 |a AM_Agreement 
461 1 |t Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy  |c Berlin  |n Springer Nature 
463 1 |t Vol. 17, iss. 12  |v P. 7525-7554  |d 2025 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a Diesel fuel 
610 1 |a FAMEs 
610 1 |a Corrosion rate 
610 1 |a Ignition delay 
610 1 |a Thermal analysis 
701 1 |a Vershinina  |b K. Yu.  |c specialist in the field of heat and power engineering  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences  |f 1992-  |g Kseniya Yurievna  |9 17337 
701 1 |a Romanov  |b D. S.  |c specialist in the field of thermal power engineering and heat engineering  |c Research Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1997-  |g Daniil Sergeevich  |9 22773 
701 1 |a Dorokhov  |b V. V.  |c specialist in the field of thermal power engineering and heat engineering  |c Research Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1997-  |g Vadim Valerjevich  |9 22771 
701 1 |a Khomutov  |b N. A.  |c specialist in the field of thermal power engineering and heat engineering  |c research engineer at Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1997-  |g Nikita Andreevich  |9 23010 
701 1 |a Strizhak  |b P. A.  |c Specialist in the field of heat power energy  |c Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences (DSc), Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU)  |f 1985-  |g Pavel Alexandrovich  |9 15117 
801 0 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20251029  |g RCR 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-025-03304-8  |z https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-025-03304-8 
942 |c CF