Energy input effects on the microstructure and mechanical behavior of Ti–Nb alloy additivelymanufactured by electron beam melting; Materials Science and Engineering: A; Vol. 938

গ্রন্থ-পঞ্জীর বিবরন
Parent link:Materials Science and Engineering: A.— .— Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc.
Vol. 938.— 2025.— Article number 148480, 18 p.
অন্যান্য লেখক: Grubova I. Yu. Irina Yurievna, Kozadayeva M. Maria, Khrapov D. Dmitriy, Rybakov V. A. Vladimir Andreevich, Sharonova A. A. Anna Aleksandrovna, Surmenev R. A. Roman Anatolievich, Koptyug A. V. Andrey, Tyurin A. Alexander, Korost D. V. Dmitry, Rasposienko D. Yu. Dmitriy, Makarov V. V. Vladimir, Surmeneva M. A. Maria Alexandrovna
সংক্ষিপ্ত:Title screen
The critical niobium content required to maintain the β phase in additively manufactured Ti–Nb alloys, preventing martensitic transformation, is still unclear. Our previous study showed that 42 wt% Nb was insufficient. Therefore, in this study, new pre-alloyed β-titanium alloys with high niobium percentage (56 wt%, Ti–56Nb) were successfully produced by Electron Beam Powder Bed Fusion (PBF-EB), and the effect of varying beam current (4 mA, 5 mA, and 7 mA) on microstructure and mechanical properties was studied. All processing regimes achieved proper fusion, with a uniform porosity distribution (∼0.3 %) and minimal niobium-enriched regions, attributed to powder heterogeneity. Beam current variations significantly affected melt pool dynamics, phase constitution, and heat distribution. Planar growth along layer boundaries and cellular structures within melt pools was observed, caused by high thermal gradients and high cooling rates. Texture analysis revealed that higher beam currents induced fiber-like textures due to zigzag beam movement and deep remelting, while 4 mA and 5 mA beam currents produced biaxial textures with minimal fiber contributions. TEM analysis indicated that higher energy input facilitated martensitic transformation, whereas lower energy enhanced β-phase stabilization. Mechanical testing identified the 4 mA regime as optimal, achieving the highest yield strength, favorable β-phase fraction, reduced elastic modulus, and enhanced wear resistance. This study demonstrates how varying beam energy inputs during PBF-EB printing can tailor the meso- and micro-scale structure and mechanical properties of Ti–56Nb alloys, providing valuable insights for optimizing densification, microstructure, texture, and mechanical performance in additive manufacturing applications
Текстовый файл
AM_Agreement
ভাষা:ইংরেজি
প্রকাশিত: 2025
বিষয়গুলি:
অনলাইন ব্যবহার করুন:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2025.148480
বিন্যাস: বৈদ্যুতিক গ্রন্থের অধ্যায়
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=680326

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 680326
005 20251223160350.0
090 |a 680326 
100 |a 20250523d2025 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a NL 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i   |b  e  
182 0 |a b 
183 0 |a cr  |2 RDAcarrier 
200 1 |a Energy input effects on the microstructure and mechanical behavior of Ti–Nb alloy additivelymanufactured by electron beam melting  |f Irina Yu. Grubova, Maria Kozadaeva, Dmitriy Khrapov [et al.] 
203 |a Текст  |c электронный  |b визуальный 
283 |a online_resource  |2 RDAcarrier 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a References: 102 tit 
330 |a The critical niobium content required to maintain the β phase in additively manufactured Ti–Nb alloys, preventing martensitic transformation, is still unclear. Our previous study showed that 42 wt% Nb was insufficient. Therefore, in this study, new pre-alloyed β-titanium alloys with high niobium percentage (56 wt%, Ti–56Nb) were successfully produced by Electron Beam Powder Bed Fusion (PBF-EB), and the effect of varying beam current (4 mA, 5 mA, and 7 mA) on microstructure and mechanical properties was studied. All processing regimes achieved proper fusion, with a uniform porosity distribution (∼0.3 %) and minimal niobium-enriched regions, attributed to powder heterogeneity. Beam current variations significantly affected melt pool dynamics, phase constitution, and heat distribution. Planar growth along layer boundaries and cellular structures within melt pools was observed, caused by high thermal gradients and high cooling rates. Texture analysis revealed that higher beam currents induced fiber-like textures due to zigzag beam movement and deep remelting, while 4 mA and 5 mA beam currents produced biaxial textures with minimal fiber contributions. TEM analysis indicated that higher energy input facilitated martensitic transformation, whereas lower energy enhanced β-phase stabilization. Mechanical testing identified the 4 mA regime as optimal, achieving the highest yield strength, favorable β-phase fraction, reduced elastic modulus, and enhanced wear resistance. This study demonstrates how varying beam energy inputs during PBF-EB printing can tailor the meso- and micro-scale structure and mechanical properties of Ti–56Nb alloys, providing valuable insights for optimizing densification, microstructure, texture, and mechanical performance in additive manufacturing applications 
336 |a Текстовый файл 
371 0 |a AM_Agreement 
461 1 |t Materials Science and Engineering: A  |c Amsterdam  |n Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc. 
463 1 |t Vol. 938  |v Article number 148480, 18 p.  |d 2025 
610 1 |a Additive manufacturing 
610 1 |a Electron beam powder bed fusion 
610 1 |a Pre-alloyed powder 
610 1 |a Beta titanium alloy 
610 1 |a Biomaterials 
610 1 |a Microstructure control 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
701 1 |a Grubova  |b I. Yu.  |c physicist  |c engineer-researcher of Tomsk Polytechnic Universit  |f 1989-  |g Irina Yurievna  |9 16573 
701 1 |a Kozadayeva  |b M.  |c chemist  |c engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1998-  |g Maria  |9 22899 
701 1 |a Khrapov  |b D.  |c Specialist in the field of nuclear technologies  |c Research Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1993-  |g Dmitriy  |9 21619 
701 1 |a Rybakov  |b V. A.  |g Vladimir Andreevich  |f 1994-  |c specialist in the field of material science  |c Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |y Tomsk  |9 88905 
701 1 |a Sharonova  |b A. A.  |c physicist  |c laboratory assistant of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1990-  |g Anna Aleksandrovna  |9 18096 
701 1 |a Surmenev  |b R. A.  |c physicist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Senior researcher, Candidate of physical and mathematical sciences  |f 1982-  |g Roman Anatolievich  |9 15957 
701 1 |a Koptyug  |b A. V.  |g Andrey 
701 1 |a Tyurin  |b A.  |g Alexander 
701 1 |a Korost  |b D. V.  |g Dmitry 
701 1 |a Rasposienko  |b D. Yu.  |g Dmitriy 
701 1 |a Makarov  |b V. V.  |g Vladimir 
701 1 |a Surmeneva  |b M. A.  |c specialist in the field of material science  |c engineer-researcher of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Associate Scientist  |f 1984-  |g Maria Alexandrovna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31894  |9 15966 
801 0 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20250523  |g RCR 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2025.148480  |z https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2025.148480 
942 |c CF