Limiting Conditions for Droplet Fragmentation of Stabilized Suspension Fuels; Applied Sciences; Vol. 12, iss. 23

Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Parent link:Applied Sciences.— .— Basel: MDPI AG
Vol. 12, iss. 23.— 2022.— Article number 12271, 19 p.
Egile nagusia: Antonov D. V. Dmitry Vladimirovich
Beste egile batzuk: Romanov D. S. Daniil Sergeevich, Kuznetsov G. V. Geny Vladimirovich
Gaia:Title screen
The main barrier to the wide use of composite liquid fuels in the energy sector is the significant sedimentation of solid particles during fuel storage and transportation. As a result, the composition of fuel slurries changes quite fast and considerably when yet another portion of fuel is pumped from a storage tank. Stabilizing additives are one of the possible solutions to this problem. The technology of primary and secondary slurry fuel atomization is generally considered promising for obtaining a spray of small fragments (droplets and particles). This way, droplets of liquid components and solid particles can be produced with a size of less than 10 μm. A fuel aerosol with particles and droplets this small burns out rapidly. The most effective secondary droplet atomization technology is based on their microexplosive breakup in combustion chambers by superheating the water in the fuel to exceed its nucleation (boiling) point. As part of this research, we studied the impact of the main stabilizing additives to slurry fuels on droplet breakup behavior: heating time until breakup, breakup delay and duration, and the number, size, and velocities of secondary fragments. Soy lecithin and sodium lignosulfonate were used as stabilizers. The main components of the fuel slurries were water, rapeseed oil, diesel fuel, coal processing waste (filter cake), coking bituminous coal, soy lecithin, and sodium lignosulfonate. Droplets were heated at an ambient gas temperature ranging from 450 to 1050 K until the breakup conditions were achieved. Mathematical expressions were obtained for the relationship between input parameters and the key characteristics of the process. Principal differences and overall patterns of droplet breakup were established for slurries with and without stabilizing additives
Текстовый файл
Hizkuntza:ingelesa
Argitaratua: 2022
Gaiak:
Sarrera elektronikoa:https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312271
Formatua: Baliabide elektronikoa Liburu kapitulua
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=680202

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 680202
005 20250514121616.0
090 |a 680202 
100 |a 20250514d2022 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a CH 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i   |b  e  
182 0 |a b 
183 0 |a cr  |2 RDAcarrier 
200 1 |a Limiting Conditions for Droplet Fragmentation of Stabilized Suspension Fuels  |f Dmitrii V. Antonov, Daniil S. Romanov, Genii V. Kuznetsov 
203 |a Текст  |b визуальный  |c электронный 
283 |a online_resource  |2 RDAcarrier 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a References: 57 tit 
330 |a The main barrier to the wide use of composite liquid fuels in the energy sector is the significant sedimentation of solid particles during fuel storage and transportation. As a result, the composition of fuel slurries changes quite fast and considerably when yet another portion of fuel is pumped from a storage tank. Stabilizing additives are one of the possible solutions to this problem. The technology of primary and secondary slurry fuel atomization is generally considered promising for obtaining a spray of small fragments (droplets and particles). This way, droplets of liquid components and solid particles can be produced with a size of less than 10 μm. A fuel aerosol with particles and droplets this small burns out rapidly. The most effective secondary droplet atomization technology is based on their microexplosive breakup in combustion chambers by superheating the water in the fuel to exceed its nucleation (boiling) point. As part of this research, we studied the impact of the main stabilizing additives to slurry fuels on droplet breakup behavior: heating time until breakup, breakup delay and duration, and the number, size, and velocities of secondary fragments. Soy lecithin and sodium lignosulfonate were used as stabilizers. The main components of the fuel slurries were water, rapeseed oil, diesel fuel, coal processing waste (filter cake), coking bituminous coal, soy lecithin, and sodium lignosulfonate. Droplets were heated at an ambient gas temperature ranging from 450 to 1050 K until the breakup conditions were achieved. Mathematical expressions were obtained for the relationship between input parameters and the key characteristics of the process. Principal differences and overall patterns of droplet breakup were established for slurries with and without stabilizing additives 
336 |a Текстовый файл 
461 1 |t Applied Sciences  |c Basel  |n MDPI AG 
463 1 |t Vol. 12, iss. 23  |v Article number 12271, 19 p.  |d 2022 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a coal–water slurries 
610 1 |a stabilization 
610 1 |a additives 
610 1 |a microexplosive droplet breakup 
610 1 |a microexplosion 
610 1 |a child droplets 
700 1 |a Antonov  |b D. V.  |c specialist in the field of heat and power engineering  |c Associate Professor, Research Engineer at Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences  |f 1996-  |g Dmitry Vladimirovich  |9 22322 
701 1 |a Romanov  |b D. S.  |c specialist in the field of thermal power engineering and heat engineering  |c Research Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1997-  |g Daniil Sergeevich  |9 22773 
701 1 |a Kuznetsov  |b G. V.  |c Specialist in the field of heat power energy  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences  |f 1949-  |g Geny Vladimirovich  |9 15963 
801 0 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20250514 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312271  |z https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312271 
942 |c CF