Evaporation and heat exchange of a thin liquid layer under various heating methods: Advantages of local heating over uniform heating of the wall; International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer; Vol. 149

Opis bibliograficzny
Parent link:International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer.— .— Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc.
Vol. 149.— 2023.— Article number 107138, 12 p.
Kolejni autorzy: Misyura S. Ya. Sergey Yakovlevich, Egorov R. I. Roman Igorevich, Morozov V. S. Vladimir Sergeevich, Zaitsev A. S. Aleksandr Sergeevich
Streszczenie:Title screen
Intensification of heat transfer and evaporation is widely used in modern technologies at limited dimensions of heat exchange surfaces and high energy density. To date, stationary heat transfer at uniform wall heating, has been most thoroughly investigated. Meanwhile, there is no comprehensive research providing a comparison of free convection, heat transfer and evaporation with different heating methods. The novelty of the work lies in the comparison of the heat transfer efficiency using one laser beam, two beams and homogeneous heating. When heated by a single laser beam, the average temperature of the layer interface is significantly lower than at homogeneous heating. However, due to the generation of intense Marangoni flow, a small heating spot provides more intense evaporation than homogeneous heating. The effectiveness of heat transfer is analyzed in terms of the total efficiency coefficient. If it is important to take into account power input, it is preferable to use a single laser beam. If it is not decisive, then two laser beams allow achieving maximum heat transfer and evaporation rate. Homogeneous heating is significantly inferior to local non-stationary heating in terms of all key criteria. The simple expressions serve to optimize the total efficiency coefficient
Текстовый файл
AM_Agreement
Język:angielski
Wydane: 2023
Hasła przedmiotowe:
Dostęp online:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2023.107138
Format: Elektroniczne Rozdział
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=679852

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 679852
005 20250423113130.0
090 |a 679852 
100 |a 20250423d2023 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a NL 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i   |b  e  
182 0 |a b 
183 0 |a cr  |2 RDAcarrier 
200 1 |a Evaporation and heat exchange of a thin liquid layer under various heating methods: Advantages of local heating over uniform heating of the wall  |f S. Y. Misyura, R. I. Egorov, V. S. Morozov, A. S. Zaitsev  
203 |a Текст  |b визуальный  |c электронный 
283 |a online_resource  |2 RDAcarrier 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a References: 56 tit 
330 |a Intensification of heat transfer and evaporation is widely used in modern technologies at limited dimensions of heat exchange surfaces and high energy density. To date, stationary heat transfer at uniform wall heating, has been most thoroughly investigated. Meanwhile, there is no comprehensive research providing a comparison of free convection, heat transfer and evaporation with different heating methods. The novelty of the work lies in the comparison of the heat transfer efficiency using one laser beam, two beams and homogeneous heating. When heated by a single laser beam, the average temperature of the layer interface is significantly lower than at homogeneous heating. However, due to the generation of intense Marangoni flow, a small heating spot provides more intense evaporation than homogeneous heating. The effectiveness of heat transfer is analyzed in terms of the total efficiency coefficient. If it is important to take into account power input, it is preferable to use a single laser beam. If it is not decisive, then two laser beams allow achieving maximum heat transfer and evaporation rate. Homogeneous heating is significantly inferior to local non-stationary heating in terms of all key criteria. The simple expressions serve to optimize the total efficiency coefficient 
336 |a Текстовый файл 
371 0 |a AM_Agreement 
461 1 |t International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer  |c Amsterdam  |n Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc. 
463 1 |t Vol. 149  |v Article number 107138, 12 p.  |d 2023 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a Laser heating 
610 1 |a Natural convection 
610 1 |a Heat mass transfer 
610 1 |a Velocity field instability 
701 1 |a Misyura  |b S. Ya.  |c specialist in the field of power engineering  |c leading researcher of Tomsk Polytechnic University, candidate of technical sciences  |f 1964-  |g Sergey Yakovlevich  |9 21039 
701 1 |a Egorov  |b R. I.  |c specialist in the field of heat and power engineering  |c Researcher of Tomsk Polytechnic University, candidate of physical and mathematical sciences  |f 1980-  |g Roman Igorevich  |9 19642 
701 1 |a Morozov  |b V. S.  |g Vladimir Sergeevich 
701 1 |a Zaitsev  |b A. S.  |c specialist in the field of heat and power engineering  |c Associate Professor, highly qualified worker of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences  |f 1991-  |g Aleksandr Sergeevich  |9 19177 
801 0 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20250423 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2023.107138  |z https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2023.107138 
942 |c CF