Catching-up regional strategy as a tool to reduce spatial inequality; Journal of the Geographical Institute Jovan Cvijic SASA; Vol. 73, No. 1
| Parent link: | Journal of the Geographical Institute Jovan Cvijic SASA.— .— Belgrade: Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts Vol. 73, No. 1.— 2023.— P. 33-48 |
|---|---|
| Συγγραφή απο Οργανισμό/Αρχή: | |
| Άλλοι συγγραφείς: | , , , , |
| Περίληψη: | Title screen The article is devoted to the problem of spatial inequality of regions caused by centripetal or centrifugal forces because of agglomeration effects and interaction costs. It corresponds with the main idea of new economic geography. A differentiated approach to regional development strategizing is proposed in the study as a tool for reducing the level of spatial imbalance. Herein the use of technological arbitrage (catching-up) strategy is proposed for peripheral regions by strengthening interregional interaction. In the paper, two hypotheses are investigated: (1) The economic growth of territories, caused by industry diversification, positive externalities from Research and Development, the quality of human capital, which are typical of the “center” type of regions and (2) The formation of a unified macroeconomic space is possible due to strategies of technological arbitrage (catching-up strategy) for peripheral regions. Its implementation is possible through innovation, industrial-technological, and trade-technological complementarity development of peripheral regions with the central regions. The research methods are: panel regression with fixed effects, Data Envelopment Analysis method, and Malmquist Productivity Index, paired interregional complementarity indices. The study focuses on 10 regions of Siberian Federal District in the Russia, which differ in scale, structure, and level of innovative economic development. The study results confirm the possibility of reducing the level of spatial inequality using catching-up strategies and innovation complementarity of the regions. These strategies proved only for technical efficiency leading regions with high index of complementarity. In regions with a low complementarity index and different industry profile, large-scale interregional cooperation has not been confirmed Текстовый файл |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έκδοση: |
2023
|
| Θέματα: | |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: | https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI2301033C |
| Μορφή: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Κεφάλαιο βιβλίου |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=677922 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nla0a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 677922 | ||
| 005 | 20250619092615.0 | ||
| 090 | |a 677922 | ||
| 100 | |a 20241225a2023 k||y0engy50 ba | ||
| 101 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 102 | |a RS | ||
| 135 | |a drcn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | |a i |b e | |
| 182 | 0 | |a b | |
| 183 | 0 | |a cr |2 RDAcarrier | |
| 200 | 1 | |a Catching-up regional strategy as a tool to reduce spatial inequality |f Natalia Chistyakova, Alexander Mikhalchuk, Yulia Bocharova [et al.] | |
| 203 | |a Текст |c электронный |b визуальный | ||
| 283 | |a online_resource |2 RDAcarrier | ||
| 300 | |a Title screen | ||
| 330 | |a The article is devoted to the problem of spatial inequality of regions caused by centripetal or centrifugal forces because of agglomeration effects and interaction costs. It corresponds with the main idea of new economic geography. A differentiated approach to regional development strategizing is proposed in the study as a tool for reducing the level of spatial imbalance. Herein the use of technological arbitrage (catching-up) strategy is proposed for peripheral regions by strengthening interregional interaction. In the paper, two hypotheses are investigated: (1) The economic growth of territories, caused by industry diversification, positive externalities from Research and Development, the quality of human capital, which are typical of the “center” type of regions and (2) The formation of a unified macroeconomic space is possible due to strategies of technological arbitrage (catching-up strategy) for peripheral regions. Its implementation is possible through innovation, industrial-technological, and trade-technological complementarity development of peripheral regions with the central regions. The research methods are: panel regression with fixed effects, Data Envelopment Analysis method, and Malmquist Productivity Index, paired interregional complementarity indices. The study focuses on 10 regions of Siberian Federal District in the Russia, which differ in scale, structure, and level of innovative economic development. The study results confirm the possibility of reducing the level of spatial inequality using catching-up strategies and innovation complementarity of the regions. These strategies proved only for technical efficiency leading regions with high index of complementarity. In regions with a low complementarity index and different industry profile, large-scale interregional cooperation has not been confirmed | ||
| 336 | |a Текстовый файл | ||
| 461 | 1 | |t Journal of the Geographical Institute Jovan Cvijic SASA |c Belgrade |n Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts | |
| 463 | 1 | |t Vol. 73, No. 1 |v P. 33-48 |d 2023 | |
| 610 | 1 | |a Data Envelopment Analysis method | |
| 610 | 1 | |a Malmquist Productivity Index | |
| 610 | 1 | |a catching-up strategy;innovation complementarity | |
| 610 | 1 | |a new economic geography | |
| 610 | 1 | |a электронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a труды учёных ТПУ | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Chistyakova |b N. O. |c economist |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of economic sciences |f 1980- |g Natalya Olegovna |9 15230 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Mikhalchuk |b A. A. |c mathematician |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of physical and mathematical sciences |f 1954- |g Aleksandr Alexandrovich |9 15995 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Bocharova |b Yu. S |g Yuliya Sergeevna |f 1990- |c Economist |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of economic sciences |y Tomsk |9 88814 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Akerman |b E. A. |g Ekaterina Aleksandrovna | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Tatarnikova |b V. V. |c economist |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Economic Sciences |f 1990- |g Valeriya Vladimirovna |9 22830 | |
| 712 | 0 | 2 | |a National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University |c (2009- ) |9 27197 |4 570 |
| 801 | 0 | |a RU |b 63413507 |c 20241225 |g RCR | |
| 856 | 4 | |u https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI2301033C |z https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI2301033C | |
| 942 | |c CF | ||