Method of interval fusion with preference aggregation in brightness thresholds selection for automatic weld surface defects recognition; Measurement; Vol. 236

Manylion Llyfryddiaeth
Parent link:Measurement.— .— Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc.
Vol. 236.— 2024.— Article number 114969, 18 p.
Prif Awdur: Muravyov (Murav’ev) S. V. Sergey Vasilyevich
Awdur Corfforaethol: National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (570)
Awduron Eraill: Duc Cuong Nguyen
Crynodeb:Title screen
Checking the weld joint quality is carried out during visual inspection process and depends significantly on an operator’s experience. In the article, an approach is proposed to automatically determination of geometric attributes and classification of a defective region, where the segmentation of the analyzed optical image of a weld (i.e., its division into defective and defect-free regions) is carried out using a combination of two procedures: region growing and edge detecting. The brightness thresholds for these procedures are calculated by the robust method of interval fusion with preference aggregation (IF&PA) based on the analysis of the fragmented image histograms and its gradients. The results obtained by the two procedures are consolidated to obtain a refined defective region. Testing the proposed technology on 150 real optical images showed its ability to identify geometric features and detect certain weld defects with higher accuracy compared to conventional Otsu and k-means methods
Текстовый файл
AM_Agreement
Iaith:Saesneg
Cyhoeddwyd: 2024
Pynciau:
Mynediad Ar-lein:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114969
Fformat: Electronig Pennod Llyfr
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=673341

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 673341
005 20240625093434.0
090 |a 673341 
100 |a 20240625d2024 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a NL 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i   |b  e  
182 0 |a b 
183 0 |a cr  |2 RDAcarrier 
200 1 |a Method of interval fusion with preference aggregation in brightness thresholds selection for automatic weld surface defects recognition  |f S. V. Muravyov, Duc Cuong Nguyen 
203 |a Текст  |b визуальный  |c электронный 
283 |a online_resource  |2 RDAcarrier 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a References: 52 tit 
330 |a Checking the weld joint quality is carried out during visual inspection process and depends significantly on an operator’s experience. In the article, an approach is proposed to automatically determination of geometric attributes and classification of a defective region, where the segmentation of the analyzed optical image of a weld (i.e., its division into defective and defect-free regions) is carried out using a combination of two procedures: region growing and edge detecting. The brightness thresholds for these procedures are calculated by the robust method of interval fusion with preference aggregation (IF&PA) based on the analysis of the fragmented image histograms and its gradients. The results obtained by the two procedures are consolidated to obtain a refined defective region. Testing the proposed technology on 150 real optical images showed its ability to identify geometric features and detect certain weld defects with higher accuracy compared to conventional Otsu and k-means methods 
336 |a Текстовый файл 
371 0 |a AM_Agreement 
461 1 |t Measurement  |c Amsterdam  |n Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc. 
463 1 |t Vol. 236  |v Article number 114969, 18 p.  |d 2024 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a weld defect 
610 1 |a visual inspection 
610 1 |a image segmentation 
610 1 |a region growing 
610 1 |a brightness threshold 
610 1 |a edge detection 
610 1 |a canny operator 
610 1 |a interval fusion 
610 1 |a preference aggregation 
610 1 |a kemeny rule 
700 1 |a Muravyov (Murav’ev)  |b S. V.  |c specialist in the field of control and measurement equipment  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University,Doctor of technical sciences  |f 1954-  |g Sergey Vasilyevich  |9 15440 
701 0 |a Duc Cuong Nguyen 
712 0 2 |a National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University  |c (2009- )  |9 27197  |4 570 
801 0 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20240625 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114969  |z https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114969 
942 |c CR