Prediction of fracture density in a gas reservoir using robust computational approaches; Frontiers in Earth Science; Vol. 10

Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Parent link:Frontiers in Earth Science
Vol. 10.— 2022.— [22 p.]
Erakunde egilea: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Инженерная школа природных ресурсов Отделение нефтегазового дела
Beste egile batzuk: Guozhong Gao, Hazbeh Omid, Davoodi Sh. Shadfar, Tabasi Somayeh, Rajabi Meysam, Ghorbani Hamzeh, Radwan A. E. Ahmed, Csaba Mako, Mosavi Amir
Gaia:Title screen
One of the challenges that reservoir engineers, drilling engineers, and geoscientists face in the oil and gas industry is determining the fracture density (FVDC) of reservoir rock. This critical parameter is valuable because its presence in oil and gas reservoirs boosts productivity and is pivotal for reservoir management, operation, and ultimately energy management. This valuable parameter is determined by some expensive operations such as FMI logs and core analysis techniques. As a result, this paper attempts to predict this important parameter using petrophysics logs routinely collected at oil and gas wells and by applying four robust computational algorithms and artificial intelligence hybrids. A total of 6067 data points were collected from three gas wells (#W1, #W2, and #W3) in one gas reservoir in Southwest Asia. Following feature selection, the input variables include spectral gamma ray (SGR); sonic porosity (PHIS); potassium (POTA); photoelectric absorption factor (PEF); neutron porosity (NPHI); sonic transition time (DT); bulk density (RHOB); and corrected gamma ray (CGR). In this study, four hybrids of two networks were used, including least squares support vector machine (LSSVM) and multi-layer perceptron (MLP) with two optimizers particle swarm optimizer (PSO) and genetic algorithm (GA).
Four robust hybrid machine learning models were applied, and these are LSSVM-PSO/GA and MLP-PSO/GA, which had not previously used for prediction of FVDC. In addition, the k-fold cross validation method with k equal to 8 was used in this article. When the performance accuracy of the hybrid algorithms for the FVDC prediction is compared, the revealed result is LSSVM-PSO > LSSVM-GA > MLP-PSO > MLP-GA. The study revealed that the best algorithm for predicting FVDC among the four algorithms is LSSVM-PSO (for total dataset RMSE = 0.0463 1/m; R2 = 0.9995). This algorithm has several advantages, including: 1) lower adjustment parameters, 2) high search efficiency, 3) fast convergence speed, 4) increased global search capability, and 5) preventing the local optimum from falling. When compared to other models, this model has the lowest error.
Hizkuntza:ingelesa
Argitaratua: 2022
Gaiak:
Sarrera elektronikoa:https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.1023578
Formatua: Baliabide elektronikoa Liburu kapitulua
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=668973

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 668973
005 20250910095613.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\40210 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\40120 
090 |a 668973 
100 |a 20230206d2022 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a CH 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Prediction of fracture density in a gas reservoir using robust computational approaches  |f Guozhong Gao, Hazbeh Omid, Sh. Davoodi [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: 88 tit.] 
330 |a One of the challenges that reservoir engineers, drilling engineers, and geoscientists face in the oil and gas industry is determining the fracture density (FVDC) of reservoir rock. This critical parameter is valuable because its presence in oil and gas reservoirs boosts productivity and is pivotal for reservoir management, operation, and ultimately energy management. This valuable parameter is determined by some expensive operations such as FMI logs and core analysis techniques. As a result, this paper attempts to predict this important parameter using petrophysics logs routinely collected at oil and gas wells and by applying four robust computational algorithms and artificial intelligence hybrids. A total of 6067 data points were collected from three gas wells (#W1, #W2, and #W3) in one gas reservoir in Southwest Asia. Following feature selection, the input variables include spectral gamma ray (SGR); sonic porosity (PHIS); potassium (POTA); photoelectric absorption factor (PEF); neutron porosity (NPHI); sonic transition time (DT); bulk density (RHOB); and corrected gamma ray (CGR). In this study, four hybrids of two networks were used, including least squares support vector machine (LSSVM) and multi-layer perceptron (MLP) with two optimizers particle swarm optimizer (PSO) and genetic algorithm (GA). 
330 |a Four robust hybrid machine learning models were applied, and these are LSSVM-PSO/GA and MLP-PSO/GA, which had not previously used for prediction of FVDC. In addition, the k-fold cross validation method with k equal to 8 was used in this article. When the performance accuracy of the hybrid algorithms for the FVDC prediction is compared, the revealed result is LSSVM-PSO > LSSVM-GA > MLP-PSO > MLP-GA. The study revealed that the best algorithm for predicting FVDC among the four algorithms is LSSVM-PSO (for total dataset RMSE = 0.0463 1/m; R2 = 0.9995). This algorithm has several advantages, including: 1) lower adjustment parameters, 2) high search efficiency, 3) fast convergence speed, 4) increased global search capability, and 5) preventing the local optimum from falling. When compared to other models, this model has the lowest error. 
461 |t Frontiers in Earth Science 
463 |t Vol. 10  |v [22 p.]  |d 2022 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
701 0 |a Guozhong Gao 
701 0 |a Hazbeh Omid 
701 1 |a Davoodi  |b Sh.  |c specialist in the field of petroleum engineering  |c Research Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1990-  |g Shadfar  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\46542  |9 22200 
701 0 |a Tabasi Somayeh 
701 0 |a Rajabi Meysam 
701 0 |a Ghorbani Hamzeh 
701 1 |a Radwan  |b A. E.  |g Ahmed 
701 0 |a Csaba Mako 
701 0 |a Mosavi Amir 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Инженерная школа природных ресурсов  |b Отделение нефтегазового дела  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23546 
801 0 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20230206  |g RCR 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.1023578 
942 |c CF