Improvement of the Surface Properties of Polyether Ether Ketone via Arc Evaporation for Biomedical Applications

Chi tiết về thư mục
Parent link:Materials
Vol. 16 iss. 8.— 2023.— [2990, 15 p.]
Tác giả khác: Fedotkin A. Yu. Aleksandr Yurjevich, Akimchenko I. O. Igor Olegovich, Tran Tuan Hoang, Shugurov A. R. Artur Rubinovich, Shesterikov E. V. Evgeny Viktorovich, Kozelskaya A. I. Anna Ivanovna, Rutkowski S. Sven, Tverdokhlebov S. I. Sergei Ivanovich
Tóm tắt:Title screen
Polyether ether ketone is a bioinert polymer, that is of high interest in research and medicine as an alternative material for the replacement of bone implants made of metal. The biggest deficit of this polymer is its hydrophobic surface, which is rather unfavorable for cell adhesion and thus leads to slow osseointegration. In order to address this drawback, 3D-printed and polymer extruded polyether ether ketone disc samples that were surface-modified with titanium thin films of four different thicknesses via arc evaporation were investigated and compared with non-modified disc samples. Depending on the modification time, the thickness of the coatings ranged from 40 nm to 450 nm. The 3D-printing process does not affect the surface or bulk properties of polyether ether ketone. It turned out that the chemical composition of the coatings obtained did not depend on the type of substrate. Titanium coatings contain titanium oxide and have an amorphous structure. Microdroplets formed on the sample surfaces during treatment with an arc evaporator contain a rutile phase in their composition. Surface modification of the samples via arc evaporation resulted in an increase in the arithmetic mean roughness from 20 nm to 40 nm for the extruded samples and from 40 nm to 100 nm for the 3D-printed samples, with the mean height difference increasing from 100 nm to 250 nm and from 140 nm to 450 nm. Despite the fact that the hardness and reduced elastic modulus of the unmodified 3D-printed samples (0.33 GPa and 5.80 GPa) are higher than those of the unmodified extruded samples (0.22 GPa and 3.40 GPa), the surface properties of the samples after modification are approximately the same. The water contact angles of the polyether ether ketone sample surfaces decrease from 70° to 10° for the extruded samples and from 80° to 6° for the 3D-printed samples as the thickness of the titanium coating increases, making this type of coating promising for biomedical applications.
Ngôn ngữ:Tiếng Anh
Được phát hành: 2023
Những chủ đề:
Truy cập trực tuyến:https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16082990
Định dạng: Điện tử Chương của sách
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=668688

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 668688
005 20251206120253.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\39925 
090 |a 668688 
100 |a 20230118d2023 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a CH 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Improvement of the Surface Properties of Polyether Ether Ketone via Arc Evaporation for Biomedical Applications  |f A. Yu. Fedotkin, I. O. Akimchenko, Tran Tuan Hoang [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: 47 tit.] 
330 |a Polyether ether ketone is a bioinert polymer, that is of high interest in research and medicine as an alternative material for the replacement of bone implants made of metal. The biggest deficit of this polymer is its hydrophobic surface, which is rather unfavorable for cell adhesion and thus leads to slow osseointegration. In order to address this drawback, 3D-printed and polymer extruded polyether ether ketone disc samples that were surface-modified with titanium thin films of four different thicknesses via arc evaporation were investigated and compared with non-modified disc samples. Depending on the modification time, the thickness of the coatings ranged from 40 nm to 450 nm. The 3D-printing process does not affect the surface or bulk properties of polyether ether ketone. It turned out that the chemical composition of the coatings obtained did not depend on the type of substrate. Titanium coatings contain titanium oxide and have an amorphous structure. Microdroplets formed on the sample surfaces during treatment with an arc evaporator contain a rutile phase in their composition. Surface modification of the samples via arc evaporation resulted in an increase in the arithmetic mean roughness from 20 nm to 40 nm for the extruded samples and from 40 nm to 100 nm for the 3D-printed samples, with the mean height difference increasing from 100 nm to 250 nm and from 140 nm to 450 nm. Despite the fact that the hardness and reduced elastic modulus of the unmodified 3D-printed samples (0.33 GPa and 5.80 GPa) are higher than those of the unmodified extruded samples (0.22 GPa and 3.40 GPa), the surface properties of the samples after modification are approximately the same. The water contact angles of the polyether ether ketone sample surfaces decrease from 70° to 10° for the extruded samples and from 80° to 6° for the 3D-printed samples as the thickness of the titanium coating increases, making this type of coating promising for biomedical applications. 
461 |t Materials 
463 |t Vol. 16 iss. 8  |v [2990, 15 p.]  |d 2023 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a 3D-printing 
610 1 |a polyether ether ketone 
610 1 |a arc evaporation 
610 1 |a titanium coatings 
610 1 |a roughness 
610 1 |a wettability 
610 1 |a 3D-печать 
610 1 |a полиэфиркетоны 
610 1 |a титановые покрытия 
610 1 |a шероховатости 
610 1 |a смачиваемость 
701 1 |a Fedotkin  |b A. Yu.  |c physicist  |c engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1994-  |g Aleksandr Yurjevich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\44107  |9 21763 
701 1 |a Akimchenko  |b I. O.  |c Physicist  |c Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1996-  |g Igor Olegovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\47049  |9 22643 
701 0 |a Tran Tuan Hoang  |c specialist in the field of nuclear technologies  |c engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1993-  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\47572  |9 23068 
701 1 |a Shugurov  |b A. R.  |c Specialist in the field of material science  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences  |f 1967-  |g Artur Rubinovich  |y Tomsk  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\47047  |9 22641 
701 1 |a Shesterikov  |b E. V.  |c physicist  |c leading engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1979-  |g Evgeny Viktorovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\35793  |9 18950 
701 1 |a Kozelskaya  |b A. I.  |c physicist  |c Researcher at Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences  |f 1985-  |g Anna Ivanovna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\39663  |9 21044 
701 1 |a Rutkowski  |b S.  |c chemist  |c Research Engineer, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Ph.D  |f 1981-  |g Sven  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\46773  |9 22409 
701 1 |a Tverdokhlebov  |b S. I.  |c physicist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of physical and mathematical science  |f 1961-  |g Sergei Ivanovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\30855  |9 15101 
801 0 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20230517  |g RCR 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16082990  |z https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16082990 
942 |c CF