Neutrophil Immunomodulatory Activity of (−)-Borneol, a Major Component of Essential Oils Extracted from Grindelia squarrosa; Molecules; Vol. 27, iss. 15

Bibliografiske detaljer
Parent link:Molecules
Vol. 27, iss. 15.— 2022.— [4897, 17 p.]
Institution som forfatter: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Инженерная школа новых производственных технологий Научно-образовательный центр Н. М. Кижнера
Andre forfattere: Schepetkin (Shchepyotkin) I. A. Igor Aleksandrovich, Ozek G. Gulmira, Ozek T. Temel, Kirpotina L. N. Liliya Nikolaevna, Khlebnikov A. I. Andrey Ivanovich, Quinn M. T. Mark
Summary:Title screen
Grindelia squarrosa (Pursh) Dunal is used in traditional medicine for treating various diseases; however, little is known about the immunomodulatory activity of essential oils from this plant. Thus, we isolated essential oils from the flowers (GEOFl) and leaves (GEOLv) of G. squarrosa and evaluated the chemical composition and innate immunomodulatory activity of these essential oils. Compositional analysis of these essential oils revealed that the main components were α-pinene (24.7 and 23.2% in GEOFl and GEOLv, respectively), limonene (10.0 and 14.7%), borneol (23.4 and 16.6%), p-cymen-8-ol (6.1 and 5.8%), β-pinene (4.0 and 3.8%), bornyl acetate (3.0 and 5.1%), trans-pinocarveol (4.2 and 3.7%), spathulenol (3.0 and 2.0%), myrtenol (2.5 and 1.7%), and terpinolene (1.7 and 2.0%). Enantiomer analysis showed that α-pinene, β-pinene, and borneol were present primarily as (−)-enantiomers (100% enantiomeric excess (ee) for (−)-α-pinene and (−)-borneol in both GEOFl and GEOLv; 82 and 78% ee for (−)-β-pinene in GEOFl and GEOLv), while limonene was present primarily as the (+)-enantiomer (94 and 96 ee in GEOFl and GEOLv).
Grindelia essential oils activated human neutrophils, resulting in increased [Ca2+]i (EC50 = 22.3 µg/mL for GEOFl and 19.4 µg/mL for GEOLv). In addition, one of the major enantiomeric components, (−)-borneol, activated human neutrophil [Ca2+]i (EC50 = 28.7 ± 2.6), whereas (+)-borneol was inactive. Since these treatments activated neutrophils, we also evaluated if they were able to down-regulate neutrophil responses to subsequent agonist activation and found that treatment with Grindelia essential oils inhibited activation of these cells by the N-formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) agonist fMLF and the FPR2 agonist WKYMVM. Likewise, (−)-borneol inhibited FPR-agonist-induced Ca2+ influx in neutrophils. Grindelia leaf and flower essential oils, as well as (−)-borneol, also inhibited fMLF-induced chemotaxis of human neutrophils (IC50 = 4.1 ± 0.8 µg/mL, 5.0 ± 1.6 µg/mL, and 5.8 ± 1.4 µM, respectively). Thus, we identified (−)-borneol as a novel modulator of human neutrophil function.
Sprog:engelsk
Udgivet: 2022
Fag:
Online adgang:https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154897
Format: MixedMaterials Electronisk Book Chapter
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=668623

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 668623
005 20250225110158.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\39860 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\39329 
090 |a 668623 
100 |a 20230111d2022 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a CH 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Neutrophil Immunomodulatory Activity of (−)-Borneol, a Major Component of Essential Oils Extracted from Grindelia squarrosa  |f I. A. Schepetkin (Shchepyotkin), G. Ozek, T. Ozek [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: 79 tit.] 
330 |a Grindelia squarrosa (Pursh) Dunal is used in traditional medicine for treating various diseases; however, little is known about the immunomodulatory activity of essential oils from this plant. Thus, we isolated essential oils from the flowers (GEOFl) and leaves (GEOLv) of G. squarrosa and evaluated the chemical composition and innate immunomodulatory activity of these essential oils. Compositional analysis of these essential oils revealed that the main components were α-pinene (24.7 and 23.2% in GEOFl and GEOLv, respectively), limonene (10.0 and 14.7%), borneol (23.4 and 16.6%), p-cymen-8-ol (6.1 and 5.8%), β-pinene (4.0 and 3.8%), bornyl acetate (3.0 and 5.1%), trans-pinocarveol (4.2 and 3.7%), spathulenol (3.0 and 2.0%), myrtenol (2.5 and 1.7%), and terpinolene (1.7 and 2.0%). Enantiomer analysis showed that α-pinene, β-pinene, and borneol were present primarily as (−)-enantiomers (100% enantiomeric excess (ee) for (−)-α-pinene and (−)-borneol in both GEOFl and GEOLv; 82 and 78% ee for (−)-β-pinene in GEOFl and GEOLv), while limonene was present primarily as the (+)-enantiomer (94 and 96 ee in GEOFl and GEOLv). 
330 |a Grindelia essential oils activated human neutrophils, resulting in increased [Ca2+]i (EC50 = 22.3 µg/mL for GEOFl and 19.4 µg/mL for GEOLv). In addition, one of the major enantiomeric components, (−)-borneol, activated human neutrophil [Ca2+]i (EC50 = 28.7 ± 2.6), whereas (+)-borneol was inactive. Since these treatments activated neutrophils, we also evaluated if they were able to down-regulate neutrophil responses to subsequent agonist activation and found that treatment with Grindelia essential oils inhibited activation of these cells by the N-formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) agonist fMLF and the FPR2 agonist WKYMVM. Likewise, (−)-borneol inhibited FPR-agonist-induced Ca2+ influx in neutrophils. Grindelia leaf and flower essential oils, as well as (−)-borneol, also inhibited fMLF-induced chemotaxis of human neutrophils (IC50 = 4.1 ± 0.8 µg/mL, 5.0 ± 1.6 µg/mL, and 5.8 ± 1.4 µM, respectively). Thus, we identified (−)-borneol as a novel modulator of human neutrophil function. 
461 |t Molecules 
463 |t Vol. 27, iss. 15  |v [4897, 17 p.]  |d 2022 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a borneol 
610 1 |a calcium influx 
610 1 |a chemotaxis 
610 1 |a essential oils 
610 1 |a Grindelia squarrosa 
610 1 |a monoterpene 
610 1 |a neutrophil 
610 1 |a борнеолы 
610 1 |a хемотаксис 
610 1 |a эфирные масла 
610 1 |a монотерпены 
610 1 |a нейтрофилы 
701 1 |a Schepetkin (Shchepyotkin)  |b I. A.  |c doctor-biophysicist  |c leading researcher of Tomsk Polytechnic University, candidate of medical science  |f 1962-  |g Igor Aleksandrovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\37358 
701 1 |a Ozek  |b G.  |g Gulmira 
701 1 |a Ozek  |b T.  |g Temel 
701 1 |a Kirpotina  |b L. N.  |g Liliya Nikolaevna 
701 1 |a Khlebnikov  |b A. I.  |c Chemist  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1963-  |g Andrey Ivanovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33927  |9 17500 
701 1 |a Quinn  |b M. T.  |g Mark 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Инженерная школа новых производственных технологий  |b Научно-образовательный центр Н. М. Кижнера  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23556 
801 0 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20230111  |g RCR 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154897 
942 |c CF