The transition boundaries between interaction regimes of liquid droplets colliding in a gas; Chemical Engineering Research and Design; Vol. 179

Bibliographic Details
Parent link:Chemical Engineering Research and Design
Vol. 179.— 2022.— [P. 201-226]
Main Author: Tkachenko P. P. Pavel Petrovich
Corporate Author: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Инженерная школа энергетики Научно-образовательный центр И. Н. Бутакова (НОЦ И. Н. Бутакова)
Other Authors: Shlegel N. E. Nikita Evgenjevich, Strizhak P. A. Pavel Alexandrovich
Summary:Title screen
In this research, we use two different approaches to distinguishing the interaction regimes of liquid droplets in a gas environment. The first one distinguishes the following regimes: coalescence (parent droplets merge), bounce (parent droplets approach each other and then move away from each other), separation (impact produces two new droplets of a similar size as the initial ones), and disruption (two initial droplets break up into more than two fragments). The second approach distinguishes the following regimes: coalescence (merging of initial fragments), bounce (merging and consecutive splitting into two fragments of similar size as the initial ones), stretching separation (fragmentation due to the stretching of the merged droplet), and reflexive separation (fragmentation due to the tendency of each fragment to take spherical shape). Experimental results for different slurries, emulsions, solutions, and single-component compositions allowed us to distinguish transition boundaries of collision regimes using the Weber and Ohnesorge number, as well as angular and linear interaction parameters. Mathematical expressions are obtained for the boundaries, describing the variation ranges of droplet interaction parameters as well as their properties required for the consistent transition from one collision regime to another. The expressions are second order polynomials with droplet size ratio, Weber number, Ohnesorge number, and interaction parameters as variables. A database of empirical coefficients is obtained for general mathematical expressions that can be used to predict the transition boundaries of droplet collision regimes. Any of the two approaches to distinguishing the regimes is equally viable for this matter.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2022.01.019
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=668487

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 668487
005 20250304160630.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\39714 
090 |a 668487 
100 |a 20221214d2022 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a GB 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a The transition boundaries between interaction regimes of liquid droplets colliding in a gas  |f P. P. Tkachenko, N. E. Shlegel, P. A. Strizhak 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
330 |a In this research, we use two different approaches to distinguishing the interaction regimes of liquid droplets in a gas environment. The first one distinguishes the following regimes: coalescence (parent droplets merge), bounce (parent droplets approach each other and then move away from each other), separation (impact produces two new droplets of a similar size as the initial ones), and disruption (two initial droplets break up into more than two fragments). The second approach distinguishes the following regimes: coalescence (merging of initial fragments), bounce (merging and consecutive splitting into two fragments of similar size as the initial ones), stretching separation (fragmentation due to the stretching of the merged droplet), and reflexive separation (fragmentation due to the tendency of each fragment to take spherical shape). Experimental results for different slurries, emulsions, solutions, and single-component compositions allowed us to distinguish transition boundaries of collision regimes using the Weber and Ohnesorge number, as well as angular and linear interaction parameters. Mathematical expressions are obtained for the boundaries, describing the variation ranges of droplet interaction parameters as well as their properties required for the consistent transition from one collision regime to another. The expressions are second order polynomials with droplet size ratio, Weber number, Ohnesorge number, and interaction parameters as variables. A database of empirical coefficients is obtained for general mathematical expressions that can be used to predict the transition boundaries of droplet collision regimes. Any of the two approaches to distinguishing the regimes is equally viable for this matter. 
333 |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса 
461 |t Chemical Engineering Research and Design 
463 |t Vol. 179  |v [P. 201-226]  |d 2022 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a liquids 
610 1 |a solutions 
610 1 |a emulsions, and slurries 
610 1 |a droplet collisions 
610 1 |a interaction regimes 
610 1 |a transition boundaries 
610 1 |a mathematical treatment 
610 1 |a жидкости 
610 1 |a суспензии 
610 1 |a столкновения 
610 1 |a режимы взаимодействия 
700 1 |a Tkachenko  |b P. P.  |c specialist in the field of heat and power engineering  |c Research Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1996-  |g Pavel Petrovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\46849 
701 1 |a Shlegel  |b N. E.  |c specialist in the field of heat and power engineering  |c Research Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1995-  |g Nikita Evgenjevich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\46675 
701 1 |a Strizhak  |b P. A.  |c Specialist in the field of heat power energy  |c Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences (DSc), Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU)  |f 1985-  |g Pavel Alexandrovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\30871  |9 15117 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Инженерная школа энергетики  |b Научно-образовательный центр И. Н. Бутакова (НОЦ И. Н. Бутакова)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23504 
801 0 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20221214  |g RCR 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2022.01.019 
942 |c CF