Aluminum and copper nanostructures for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: A one-to-one comparison to silver and gold; Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical; Vol. 262

Bibliographic Details
Parent link:Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical
Vol. 262.— 2018.— [P. 922-927]
Corporate Authors: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Исследовательская школа химических и биомедицинских технологий, Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Исследовательская школа физики высокоэнергетических процессов
Other Authors: Rodriguez (Rodriges) Contreras R. D. Raul David, Sheremet E. S. Evgeniya Sergeevna, Nesterov M. Maxim, Moras S. Stefan, Rahaman M. Manfujur, Weiss T. Thomas, Hietschold M. Michael, Zahn D. R. T. Dietrich
Summary:Title screen
In this work, we aimed at investigating how good or bad aluminum (Al) and copper (Cu) perform in plasmonic applications as compared to silver (Ag) and gold (Au). Contrary to our expectations, and to widely accepted misconceptions, our experimental and simulation results show that Cu and Al layers on nanospheres make efficient nanostructures for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. In an unprecedented one-to-one comparison among all metal nanostructures, it is demonstrated that Al and Cu rival the conventionally used materials, Ag and Au, displaying similar enhancement. The enhancement capability was shown with the metal nanostructures exposed to air under room conditions showing that the oxide layers formed on Al and Cu do not affect their SERS performance significantly. This concise report further supports large-scale chemical sensing applications using low-cost metals compatible with mass-production fabrication in microelectronics as well as demonstrating an appropriate way to compare the electric field enhancement of different plasmonic materials.
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.02.006
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=666944

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 666944
005 20250915101150.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\38148 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\23406 
090 |a 666944 
100 |a 20220208d2018 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 1 |a eng 
102 |a NL 
135 |a arcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Aluminum and copper nanostructures for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: A one-to-one comparison to silver and gold  |f R. D. Rodriguez (Rodriges) Contreras, E. S. Sheremet, M. Nesterov [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: 33 tit.] 
330 |a In this work, we aimed at investigating how good or bad aluminum (Al) and copper (Cu) perform in plasmonic applications as compared to silver (Ag) and gold (Au). Contrary to our expectations, and to widely accepted misconceptions, our experimental and simulation results show that Cu and Al layers on nanospheres make efficient nanostructures for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. In an unprecedented one-to-one comparison among all metal nanostructures, it is demonstrated that Al and Cu rival the conventionally used materials, Ag and Au, displaying similar enhancement. The enhancement capability was shown with the metal nanostructures exposed to air under room conditions showing that the oxide layers formed on Al and Cu do not affect their SERS performance significantly. This concise report further supports large-scale chemical sensing applications using low-cost metals compatible with mass-production fabrication in microelectronics as well as demonstrating an appropriate way to compare the electric field enhancement of different plasmonic materials. 
461 |t Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 
463 |t Vol. 262  |v [P. 922-927]  |d 2018 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a plasmonics 
610 1 |a surface-enhanced 
610 1 |a raman spectroscopy 
610 1 |a chemical sensors 
610 1 |a noble metals 
610 1 |a плазмоника 
610 1 |a поверхности 
610 1 |a рамановская спектроскопия 
610 1 |a химические датчики 
610 1 |a благородные металлы 
701 1 |a Rodriguez (Rodriges) Contreras  |b R. D.  |c Venezuelan physicist, doctor of science  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1982-  |g Raul David  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\39942  |9 21179 
701 1 |a Sheremet  |b E. S.  |c physicist  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1988-  |g Evgeniya Sergeevna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\40027  |9 21197 
701 1 |a Nesterov  |b M.  |g Maxim 
701 1 |a Moras  |b S.  |g Stefan 
701 1 |a Rahaman  |b M.  |g Manfujur 
701 1 |a Weiss  |b T.  |g Thomas 
701 1 |a Hietschold  |b M.  |g Michael 
701 1 |a Zahn  |b D. R. T.  |g Dietrich 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Исследовательская школа химических и биомедицинских технологий  |c (2017- )  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23537 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Исследовательская школа физики высокоэнергетических процессов  |c (2017- )  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23551 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20220311  |g RCR 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.02.006 
942 |c CF