Study of argon ions density and electron temperature and density in magnetron plasma by optical emission spectroscopy and collisional-radiative model; Resource-Efficient Technologies; Vol. 3, iss. 2

Dades bibliogràfiques
Parent link:Resource-Efficient Technologies
Vol. 3, iss. 2.— 2017.— [P. 187-193]
Autor corporatiu: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Исследовательская школа физики высокоэнергетических процессов
Altres autors: Evdokimov K. E. Kirill Evgenievich, Konishchev M. E. Maksim Evgenievich, Pichugin V. F. Vladimir Fyodorovich, Sun Zhilei
Sumari:Title screen
Optical emission spectroscopy (OES) combined with the models of plasma light emission becomes non-intrusive and versatile method of plasma parameters determination. In this paper we have studied the densities of charge carriers and electron temperature in Ar plasma of pulsed DC magnetron in different experimental conditions. Electron density and temperature were determined by fitting of relative emission line intensities calculated from collisional-radiative model (CRM) to experimental ones. The model describes the kinetics of the first 40 excited states of neutral argon Ar and takes into account the following processes: electron impact excitation/deexcitation, spontaneous light emission, radiation trapping, electron impact ionization, and metastable quenching due to diffusion to walls. Then, ions density was determined from relative intensity of 488 nm Ar+ emission line and simple CRM accounting excitation from ground states of neutral Ar and ion Ar+. The values of electron and ion density agree very well. To test the stability of results, we performed Monte-Carlo calculations with random variation of experimental spectrum as well as of excitation cross-sections and estimated confidence intervals and errors for plasma parameters. Also, we validated OES study by comparison with Langmuir probe measurements. The agreement between optical and probe techniques is satisfactory.
Idioma:anglès
Publicat: 2017
Matèries:
Accés en línia:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reffit.2017.04.002
Format: MixedMaterials Electrònic Capítol de llibre
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=666943

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 666943
005 20250227153111.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\38147 
090 |a 666943 
100 |a 20220208d2017 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Study of argon ions density and electron temperature and density in magnetron plasma by optical emission spectroscopy and collisional-radiative model  |f K. E. Evdokimov, M. E. Konishchev, V. F. Pichugin, Sun Zhilei 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: 23 tit.] 
330 |a Optical emission spectroscopy (OES) combined with the models of plasma light emission becomes non-intrusive and versatile method of plasma parameters determination. In this paper we have studied the densities of charge carriers and electron temperature in Ar plasma of pulsed DC magnetron in different experimental conditions. Electron density and temperature were determined by fitting of relative emission line intensities calculated from collisional-radiative model (CRM) to experimental ones. The model describes the kinetics of the first 40 excited states of neutral argon Ar and takes into account the following processes: electron impact excitation/deexcitation, spontaneous light emission, radiation trapping, electron impact ionization, and metastable quenching due to diffusion to walls. Then, ions density was determined from relative intensity of 488 nm Ar+ emission line and simple CRM accounting excitation from ground states of neutral Ar and ion Ar+. The values of electron and ion density agree very well. To test the stability of results, we performed Monte-Carlo calculations with random variation of experimental spectrum as well as of excitation cross-sections and estimated confidence intervals and errors for plasma parameters. Also, we validated OES study by comparison with Langmuir probe measurements. The agreement between optical and probe techniques is satisfactory. 
461 |t Resource-Efficient Technologies 
463 |t Vol. 3, iss. 2  |v [P. 187-193]  |d 2017 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a magnetron plasma diagnostics 
610 1 |a OES 
610 1 |a CRM 
701 1 |a Evdokimov  |b K. E.  |c physicist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of physical and mathematical sciences  |f 1976-  |g Kirill Evgenievich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31791  |9 15902 
701 1 |a Konishchev  |b M. E.  |c physicist  |c Senior Lecturer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1987-  |g Maksim Evgenievich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\34212  |9 17743 
701 1 |a Pichugin  |b V. F.  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of physical and mathematical sciences  |c Physicist  |f 1944-  |g Vladimir Fyodorovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\30933 
701 0 |a Sun Zhilei 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Исследовательская школа физики высокоэнергетических процессов  |c (2017- )  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23551 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20220208  |g RCR 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reffit.2017.04.002 
942 |c BK