Angular analysis of B0→D∗−D∗+s with D∗+s→D+sγ decays; Journal of High Energy Physics; Vol. 2021, iss. 6

Détails bibliographiques
Parent link:Journal of High Energy Physics
Vol. 2021, iss. 6.— 2021.— [177, 29 p.]
Collectivités auteurs: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Исследовательская школа физики высокоэнергетических процессов, Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Инженерная школа информационных технологий и робототехники Отделение автоматизации и робототехники (ОАР)
Autres auteurs: Aaij R. Roel, Beteta C. A. Carlos Abellan, Eydelman S. I. Semen Isaakovich, Kharisova A. E. Anastasiya Evgenjevna, Panshin G. L. Gennady Leonidovich
Résumé:Title screen
The first full angular analysis of the B0→D∗−D∗+s decay is performed using 6 fb−1 of pp collision data collected with the LHCb experiment at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The D∗+s→D+sγ and D*− → D¯0π− vector meson decays are used with the subsequent D+s → K+K−π+ and D¯¯0 → K+π− decays. All helicity amplitudes and phases are measured, and the longitudinal polarisation fraction is determined to be fL = 0.578 ± 0.010 ± 0.011 with world-best precision, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. The pattern of helicity amplitude magnitudes is found to align with expectations from quark-helicity conservation in B decays. The ratio of branching fractions [ℬ(B0→D∗−D∗+s) × ℬ(D∗+s→D+sγ)]/ℬ(B0 → D*−D+s) is measured to be 2.045 ± 0.022 ± 0.071 with world-best precision. In addition, the first observation of the Cabibbo-suppressed Bs → D*−D+s decay is made with a significance of seven standard deviations. The branching fraction ratio ℬ(Bs → D*−D+s)/ℬ(B0 → D*−D+s) is measured to be 0.049 ± 0.006 ± 0.003 ± 0.002, where the third uncertainty is due to limited knowledge of the ratio of fragmentation fractions.
Langue:anglais
Publié: 2021
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/72777
https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2021)177
Format: Électronique Chapitre de livre
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=666695

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 666695
005 20250220160352.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\37899 
090 |a 666695 
100 |a 20220121d2021 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a US 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Angular analysis of B0→D∗−D∗+s with D∗+s→D+sγ decays  |f R. Aaij, C. A. Beteta, S. I. Eydelman [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: 35 tit.] 
330 |a The first full angular analysis of the B0→D∗−D∗+s decay is performed using 6 fb−1 of pp collision data collected with the LHCb experiment at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The D∗+s→D+sγ and D*− → D¯0π− vector meson decays are used with the subsequent D+s → K+K−π+ and D¯¯0 → K+π− decays. All helicity amplitudes and phases are measured, and the longitudinal polarisation fraction is determined to be fL = 0.578 ± 0.010 ± 0.011 with world-best precision, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. The pattern of helicity amplitude magnitudes is found to align with expectations from quark-helicity conservation in B decays. The ratio of branching fractions [ℬ(B0→D∗−D∗+s) × ℬ(D∗+s→D+sγ)]/ℬ(B0 → D*−D+s) is measured to be 2.045 ± 0.022 ± 0.071 with world-best precision. In addition, the first observation of the Cabibbo-suppressed Bs → D*−D+s decay is made with a significance of seven standard deviations. The branching fraction ratio ℬ(Bs → D*−D+s)/ℬ(B0 → D*−D+s) is measured to be 0.049 ± 0.006 ± 0.003 ± 0.002, where the third uncertainty is due to limited knowledge of the ratio of fragmentation fractions. 
461 |t Journal of High Energy Physics 
463 |t Vol. 2021, iss. 6  |v [177, 29 p.]  |d 2021 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a B physics 
610 1 |a branching fraction 
610 1 |a Hadron-Hadron scattering (experiments) 
610 1 |a polarization 
701 1 |a Aaij  |b R.  |g Roel 
701 1 |a Beteta  |b C. A.  |g Carlos Abellan 
701 1 |a Eydelman  |b S. I.  |g Semen Isaakovich 
701 1 |a Kharisova  |b A. E.  |c nuclear technology specialist  |c engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1994-  |g Anastasiya Evgenjevna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\46775 
701 1 |a Panshin  |b G. L.  |c specialist in the field of informatics and computer technology  |c Senior Lecturer at Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1987-  |g Gennady Leonidovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\40978  |9 21367 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Исследовательская школа физики высокоэнергетических процессов  |c (2017- )  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23551 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Инженерная школа информационных технологий и робототехники  |b Отделение автоматизации и робототехники (ОАР)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23553 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20220818  |g RCR 
856 4 |u http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/72777 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2021)177 
942 |c CF