Human Locomotion Strategies Under Changed Bodyweight Support

Detalhes bibliográficos
Parent link:Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance
Vol. 92, iss. 1.— 2021.— [P. 4-10]
Autor Corporativo: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Исследовательская школа химических и биомедицинских технологий
Outros Autores: Shpakov A. V., Plotnikov E. V. Evgeny Vladimirovich, Voronov A. V. Andrey Vladimirovich, Puchkova A. A. Alina Aleksandrovna, Orlov D. O. Dmitry Olegovich, Artamonov A. A. Anton Anatoljevich
Resumo:Title screen
Introduction: The aim of this study was the analysis of human musculoskeletal system energy costs of normal walking and walking under reduced weight loading. Methods: There were 15 subjects who participated in the study. We analyzed the biomechanical parameters of walking under different musculoskeletal system loads. The subjects walked on a treadmill at a pace of 90 steps/min under various loading conditions: 1) 100% bodyweight loading, corresponding to the terrestrial surface; 2) 38% bodyweight loading, corresponding to the surface of Mars; and 3) 17% bodyweight loading, corresponding to the surface of the Moon. Joint angles and angular velocities were recorded from the hip, knee, and ankle. Results: We analyzed changes in joint phase trajectories and the ratio of kinetic extension energy to kinetic flexion energy in the joints. We observed changes in kinetic energy parameters associated with both flexion and extension motions in the joints of the feet while walking under various loads.
In terrestrial conditions (walking under 100% bodyweight), flexion kinetic energy in the hip joint prevailed over extension kinetic energy by 90%, with a small variation equal to 22%. If weight loading decreased up to 17% (lunar conditions), the difference between flexion and extension kinetic energies diminished, and eventually reached only 9%. The ratio of flexion energy and extension energy in the ankle joint equalized under lower loading conditions. Thus, 38% bodyweight loading was sufficient for approximation of flexion and extension energy values. Discussion: Our results revealed that phase trajectories shifted toward smaller joint angles and a decreased ratio between extension kinetic energy and flexion kinetic energy in the knee joint of all subjects. However, significant differences in the ratio of flexion and extension kinetic energy in the knee joint under bodyweight support were not found. The methods used for musculoskeletal system assessments that were proposed in our work can be used in clinical practice to evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation measures in a patients musculoskeletal system disorders.
Idioma:inglês
Publicado em: 2021
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha:https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.5609.2021
Formato: Recurso Eletrônico Capítulo de Livro
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=666367

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 666367
005 20250214170932.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\37571 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\37568 
090 |a 666367 
100 |a 20211220d2021 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a US 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Human Locomotion Strategies Under Changed Bodyweight Support  |f A. V. Shpakov, E. V. Plotnikov, A. V. Voronov [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
330 |a Introduction: The aim of this study was the analysis of human musculoskeletal system energy costs of normal walking and walking under reduced weight loading. Methods: There were 15 subjects who participated in the study. We analyzed the biomechanical parameters of walking under different musculoskeletal system loads. The subjects walked on a treadmill at a pace of 90 steps/min under various loading conditions: 1) 100% bodyweight loading, corresponding to the terrestrial surface; 2) 38% bodyweight loading, corresponding to the surface of Mars; and 3) 17% bodyweight loading, corresponding to the surface of the Moon. Joint angles and angular velocities were recorded from the hip, knee, and ankle. Results: We analyzed changes in joint phase trajectories and the ratio of kinetic extension energy to kinetic flexion energy in the joints. We observed changes in kinetic energy parameters associated with both flexion and extension motions in the joints of the feet while walking under various loads. 
330 |a In terrestrial conditions (walking under 100% bodyweight), flexion kinetic energy in the hip joint prevailed over extension kinetic energy by 90%, with a small variation equal to 22%. If weight loading decreased up to 17% (lunar conditions), the difference between flexion and extension kinetic energies diminished, and eventually reached only 9%. The ratio of flexion energy and extension energy in the ankle joint equalized under lower loading conditions. Thus, 38% bodyweight loading was sufficient for approximation of flexion and extension energy values. Discussion: Our results revealed that phase trajectories shifted toward smaller joint angles and a decreased ratio between extension kinetic energy and flexion kinetic energy in the knee joint of all subjects. However, significant differences in the ratio of flexion and extension kinetic energy in the knee joint under bodyweight support were not found. The methods used for musculoskeletal system assessments that were proposed in our work can be used in clinical practice to evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation measures in a patients musculoskeletal system disorders. 
338 |b Российский фонд фундаментальных исследований  |d 18-315-20010 
461 |t Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance 
463 |t Vol. 92, iss. 1  |v [P. 4-10]  |d 2021 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a angular velocities 
610 1 |a bodyweight support 
610 1 |a joint angles 
610 1 |a musculoskeletal system 
610 1 |a phase trajectories 
610 1 |a the energy cost of walking 
610 1 |a угловые скорости 
610 1 |a энергетические затраты 
610 1 |a вес 
610 1 |a опорно-двигательный аппарат 
610 1 |a нагрузки 
610 1 |a ходьба 
701 1 |a Shpakov  |b A. V. 
701 1 |a Plotnikov  |b E. V.  |c chemist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Chemical Sciences  |f 1983-  |g Evgeny Vladimirovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\32469  |9 16417 
701 1 |a Voronov  |b A. V.  |g Andrey Vladimirovich 
701 1 |a Puchkova  |b A. A.  |g Alina Aleksandrovna 
701 1 |a Orlov  |b D. O.  |g Dmitry Olegovich 
701 1 |a Artamonov  |b A. A.  |g Anton Anatoljevich 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Исследовательская школа химических и биомедицинских технологий  |c (2017- )  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23537 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20211220  |g RCR 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.5609.2021 
942 |c CF