Theoretical study of the dose measurements reliability with longitudinally arranged dosimetry films in materials with different densities; Journal of Instrumentation; Vol. 15 : Radiation from Relativistic Electrons in Periodic Structures (RREPS-19)

Bibliografiske detaljer
Parent link:Journal of Instrumentation
Vol. 15 : Radiation from Relativistic Electrons in Periodic Structures (RREPS-19).— 2020.— [C03037, 7 p.]
Corporate Authors: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Исследовательская школа физики высокоэнергетических процессов, Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Инженерная школа ядерных технологий Отделение ядерно-топливного цикла
Andre forfattere: Bulavskaya A. A. Angelina Aleksandrovna, Cherepennikov Yu. M. Yuriy Mihaylovich, Grigorieva (Grigorjeva) A. A. Anna Anatoljevna, Miloichikova I. A. Irina Alekseevna, Startseva Zh. A. Zhanna Aleksandrovna, Stuchebrov S. G. Sergey Gennadevich, Velikaya V. V. Viktoriya Valerjevna
Summary:Title screen
Investigation purpose. Theoretical study of the depth dose measurements for therapeutic electron beam with longitudinally arranged dosimetry films in materials with different densities. Materials and methods. The work studies how the density of the medium, in which electrons propagate, affects the measured percentage depth dose and its reliability (PDD) . For that, we calculate the distribution of the electron beam dose distribution in homogeneous materials with different densities and in a dosimetry film placed in materials with these densities. The density of material in the calculation varies from 0.4 to 2.3 g/cm3 with a 0.1 g/cm3 step. The coincidence of the PDD within the experimental measurement accuracy, that equals 4% for dosimetry film and 2% for measurements without it, is chosen as the data fitting criterion. Results. The PDD calculated for two geometries and for different media densities is the result of this work. The calculation shows that PDD difference is negligible when the density of the film is equal to the media one. With decreasing of the media density the difference appears in the regions of both shallow and great depth. The PDD is lower for the geometry with film than for geometry without it in case of these densities. When the media density is rising the opposite effect is observed: the PDD in the film is higher than in geometry without film. The maximum range and therapeutic range in both geometries coincide for the calculated curves throughout the range under study. Discussion. The work shows applicability of the investigated method for measurement of the electron beam percentage depth dose in media with densities ranging from 0.9 to 1.8 g/cm3. The results show that PDD measurement method with longitudinally arranged dosimetry films can be applied to determine the maximum range and therapeutic range for media with densities of 0.4 to 2.3 g/cm3, and to measure the half-value depth for media with densities ranging from 0.7 to 2.1 g/cm3.
Sprog:engelsk
Udgivet: 2020
Fag:
Online adgang:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/15/03/C03037
Format: Electronisk Book Chapter
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=664923

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 664923
005 20250815103310.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\36108 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\36102 
090 |a 664923 
100 |a 20210528d2020 k y0engy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a GB 
135 |a vrcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Theoretical study of the dose measurements reliability with longitudinally arranged dosimetry films in materials with different densities  |f A. A. Bulavskaya, Yu. M. Cherepennikov, A. A. Grigorieva (Grigorjeva) [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: 33 tit.] 
330 |a Investigation purpose. Theoretical study of the depth dose measurements for therapeutic electron beam with longitudinally arranged dosimetry films in materials with different densities. Materials and methods. The work studies how the density of the medium, in which electrons propagate, affects the measured percentage depth dose and its reliability (PDD) . For that, we calculate the distribution of the electron beam dose distribution in homogeneous materials with different densities and in a dosimetry film placed in materials with these densities. The density of material in the calculation varies from 0.4 to 2.3 g/cm3 with a 0.1 g/cm3 step. The coincidence of the PDD within the experimental measurement accuracy, that equals 4% for dosimetry film and 2% for measurements without it, is chosen as the data fitting criterion. Results. The PDD calculated for two geometries and for different media densities is the result of this work. The calculation shows that PDD difference is negligible when the density of the film is equal to the media one. With decreasing of the media density the difference appears in the regions of both shallow and great depth. The PDD is lower for the geometry with film than for geometry without it in case of these densities. When the media density is rising the opposite effect is observed: the PDD in the film is higher than in geometry without film. The maximum range and therapeutic range in both geometries coincide for the calculated curves throughout the range under study. Discussion. The work shows applicability of the investigated method for measurement of the electron beam percentage depth dose in media with densities ranging from 0.9 to 1.8 g/cm3. The results show that PDD measurement method with longitudinally arranged dosimetry films can be applied to determine the maximum range and therapeutic range for media with densities of 0.4 to 2.3 g/cm3, and to measure the half-value depth for media with densities ranging from 0.7 to 2.1 g/cm3. 
461 1 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\25113  |t Journal of Instrumentation 
463 |t Vol. 15 : Radiation from Relativistic Electrons in Periodic Structures (RREPS-19)  |o XIII International Symposium, 16-20 September, 2019, Belgorod, Russian Federation  |o [proceedings]  |v [C03037, 7 p.]  |d 2020 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
701 1 |a Bulavskaya  |b A. A.  |c Specialist in the field of nuclear technologies  |c Senior Lecturer of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences  |f 1993-  |g Angelina Aleksandrovna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\45898  |9 22019 
701 1 |a Cherepennikov  |b Yu. M.  |c physicist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Sciences  |f 1989-  |g Yuriy Mihaylovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31561  |9 15721 
701 1 |a Grigorieva (Grigorjeva)  |b A. A.  |c nuclear technology specialist  |c engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1995-  |g Anna Anatoljevna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\46746 
701 1 |a Miloichikova  |b I. A.  |c physicist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences  |f 1988-  |g Irina Alekseevna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\35525  |9 18707 
701 1 |a Startseva  |b Zh. A.  |g Zhanna Aleksandrovna 
701 1 |a Stuchebrov  |b S. G.  |c physicist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences  |f 1981-  |g Sergey Gennadevich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31559  |9 15719 
701 1 |a Velikaya  |b V. V.  |g Viktoriya Valerjevna 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Исследовательская школа физики высокоэнергетических процессов  |c (2017- )  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23551 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Инженерная школа ядерных технологий  |b Отделение ядерно-топливного цикла  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23554 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20210528  |g RCR 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/15/03/C03037 
942 |c CF