Microplastics distribution in the Eurasian Arctic is affected by Atlantic waters and Siberian rivers; Communications Earth & Environment; Vol. 2

Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Parent link:Communications Earth & Environment
Vol. 2.— 2021.— [23, 10 p.]
Erakunde egilea: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Инженерная школа природных ресурсов Отделение геологии
Beste egile batzuk: Yakushev E. V. Evgeny, Gebruk A. A. Anna, Osadchiev A. A. Aleksandr, Pakhomova S. V. Svetlana Vladimirovna, Lusher A. Amy, Berezina A. Anfisa, Van B. B. Bavel Bert, Vorozheykina E. Elena, Chernykh D. V. Denis, Kolbasova G. D. Glafira Dmitrievna, Razgon I. Iljya, Semiletov I. P. Igor Petrovich
Gaia:Title screen
Plastic pollution is globally recognised as a threat to marine ecosystems, habitats, and wildlife, and it has now reached remote locations such as the Arctic Ocean. Nevertheless, the distribution of microplastics in the Eurasian Arctic is particularly underreported. Here we present analyses of 60 subsurface pump water samples and 48 surface neuston net samples from the Eurasian Arctic with the goal to quantify and classify microplastics in relation to oceanographic conditions. In our study area, we found on average 0.004 items of microplastics per m3 in the surface samples, and 0.8 items per m3 in the subsurface samples. Microplastic characteristics differ significantly between Atlantic surface water, Polar surface water and discharge plumes of the Great Siberian Rivers, allowing identification of two sources of microplastic pollution (p?<?0.05 for surface area, morphology, and polymer types). The highest weight concentration of microplastics was observed within surface waters of Atlantic origin. Siberian river discharge was identified as the second largest source. We conclude that these water masses govern the distribution of microplastics in the Eurasian Arctic. The microplastics properties (i.e. abundance, polymer type, size, weight concentrations) can be used for identification of the water masses.
Hizkuntza:ingelesa
Argitaratua: 2021
Gaiak:
Sarrera elektronikoa:https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00091-0
Formatua: Baliabide elektronikoa Liburu kapitulua
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=664368

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 664368
005 20250417132743.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\35552 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\34616 
090 |a 664368 
100 |a 20210412d2021 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Microplastics distribution in the Eurasian Arctic is affected by Atlantic waters and Siberian rivers  |f E. V. Yakushev, A. A. Gebruk, A. A. Osadchiev [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: 67 tit.] 
330 |a Plastic pollution is globally recognised as a threat to marine ecosystems, habitats, and wildlife, and it has now reached remote locations such as the Arctic Ocean. Nevertheless, the distribution of microplastics in the Eurasian Arctic is particularly underreported. Here we present analyses of 60 subsurface pump water samples and 48 surface neuston net samples from the Eurasian Arctic with the goal to quantify and classify microplastics in relation to oceanographic conditions. In our study area, we found on average 0.004 items of microplastics per m3 in the surface samples, and 0.8 items per m3 in the subsurface samples. Microplastic characteristics differ significantly between Atlantic surface water, Polar surface water and discharge plumes of the Great Siberian Rivers, allowing identification of two sources of microplastic pollution (p?<?0.05 for surface area, morphology, and polymer types). The highest weight concentration of microplastics was observed within surface waters of Atlantic origin. Siberian river discharge was identified as the second largest source. We conclude that these water masses govern the distribution of microplastics in the Eurasian Arctic. The microplastics properties (i.e. abundance, polymer type, size, weight concentrations) can be used for identification of the water masses. 
461 |t Communications Earth & Environment 
463 |t Vol. 2  |v [23, 10 p.]  |d 2021 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a environmental impact 
610 1 |a marine chemistry 
610 1 |a physical oceanography 
610 1 |a pollution remediation 
610 1 |a воздействия 
610 1 |a окружающая среда 
610 1 |a океанография 
701 1 |a Yakushev  |b E. V.  |g Evgeny 
701 1 |a Gebruk  |b A. A.  |g Anna 
701 1 |a Osadchiev  |b A. A.  |g Aleksandr 
701 1 |a Pakhomova  |b S. V.  |g Svetlana Vladimirovna 
701 1 |a Lusher  |b A.  |g Amy 
701 1 |a Berezina  |b A.  |g Anfisa 
701 1 |a Van  |b B. B.  |g Bavel Bert 
701 1 |a Vorozheykina  |b E.  |c Hydrogeologist  |c Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1995-  |g Elena  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\46589  |9 22247 
701 1 |a Chernykh  |b D. V.  |g Denis 
701 1 |a Kolbasova  |b G. D.  |g Glafira Dmitrievna 
701 1 |a Razgon  |b I.  |g Iljya 
701 1 |a Semiletov  |b I. P.  |c geographer  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, doctor of geographical Sciences  |f 1955-  |g Igor Petrovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\34220 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Инженерная школа природных ресурсов  |b Отделение геологии  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23542 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20210412  |g RCR 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00091-0 
942 |c CF