Absolute myocardial blood flows derived by dynamic CZT scan vs invasive fractional flow reserve: Correlation and accuracy

Detalles Bibliográficos
Parent link:Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
Vol. 28, No. 2.— 2021.— [P. 249-259]
Autor Corporativo: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Инженерная школа информационных технологий и робототехники Отделение информационных технологий
Otros Autores: Zavadovsky K. V. Konstantin Valerjevich, Mochula A. V. Andrey Viktorovich, Boshchenko A. A. Alla Aleksandrovna, Vrublevsky A. V. Aleksandr Viktorovich, Baev A. E. Andrey Evgenjevich, Krylov A. L. Aleksandr Lyubomirovich, Gulya M. O. Marina Olegovna, Nesterov E. A. Evgeny Alexandrovich, Liga R. Riccardo, Gimelli A. Alessia
Sumario:Title screen
Purpose. To define the diagnostic power of absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) evaluation on dynamic CZT imaging in intermediate risk patients in comparison with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR). Methods. Twenty-three stable CAD patients underwent one-day dynamic rest-stress 99mTc-Sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT camera. Stress and rest MBF values were calculated semi-automatically using a net retention model by Leppo. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and flow difference (FD) [MBF stress 2 MBF rest] were also estimated. A total of 28 vessels were functionally quantified with FFR: 19 (68%) vessels with a stenosis ‡ 70% and 9 (32%) with < 70% stenotic lesions. Results. The mean global MBFs at rest and during stress were 0.36 (IQR 0.33-0.54) mL/ min/g and 0.67 (IQR 0.55-0.81) mL/min/g, respectively, with an average CFR of 1.80 (IQR 1.35- 2.24). Moderate correlations between stenosis severity and FFR (r = 0.45; P = .01), stress MBF (r = 20.46; P = .01) and FD (r = 20.37; P = .04) were detected. FFR abnormalities were best predicted by absolute stress MBF, CFR and FD with values of £ 0.54 mL/min/g (sensitivity 61.5%; specificity 93.3%), £ 1.48 (sensitivity 69.2%; specificity 93.3%) and £ 0.18 mL/min/g (sensitivity 69.2%; specificity 100%), respectively. Conclusions. The values of stress MBF, CFR and FD obtained through dynamic CZT acquisitions compare well with invasive FFR. The clinical use of dynamic acquisition of myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT may help cardiologist in the detection of hemodynamically significant CAD. (J Nucl Cardiol 2021;28:249-59.)
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01678-z
Formato: Electrónico Capítulo de libro
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=664182

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 664182
005 20250814111939.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\35366 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\35256 
090 |a 664182 
100 |a 20210330d2021 k||y0engy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Absolute myocardial blood flows derived by dynamic CZT scan vs invasive fractional flow reserve: Correlation and accuracy  |f K. V. Zavadovsky, A. V. Mochula, A. A. Boshchenko [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: 42 tit.] 
330 |a Purpose. To define the diagnostic power of absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) evaluation on dynamic CZT imaging in intermediate risk patients in comparison with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR). Methods. Twenty-three stable CAD patients underwent one-day dynamic rest-stress 99mTc-Sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT camera. Stress and rest MBF values were calculated semi-automatically using a net retention model by Leppo. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and flow difference (FD) [MBF stress 2 MBF rest] were also estimated. A total of 28 vessels were functionally quantified with FFR: 19 (68%) vessels with a stenosis ‡ 70% and 9 (32%) with < 70% stenotic lesions. Results. The mean global MBFs at rest and during stress were 0.36 (IQR 0.33-0.54) mL/ min/g and 0.67 (IQR 0.55-0.81) mL/min/g, respectively, with an average CFR of 1.80 (IQR 1.35- 2.24). Moderate correlations between stenosis severity and FFR (r = 0.45; P = .01), stress MBF (r = 20.46; P = .01) and FD (r = 20.37; P = .04) were detected. FFR abnormalities were best predicted by absolute stress MBF, CFR and FD with values of £ 0.54 mL/min/g (sensitivity 61.5%; specificity 93.3%), £ 1.48 (sensitivity 69.2%; specificity 93.3%) and £ 0.18 mL/min/g (sensitivity 69.2%; specificity 100%), respectively. Conclusions. The values of stress MBF, CFR and FD obtained through dynamic CZT acquisitions compare well with invasive FFR. The clinical use of dynamic acquisition of myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT may help cardiologist in the detection of hemodynamically significant CAD. (J Nucl Cardiol 2021;28:249-59.) 
333 |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса 
461 |t Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 
463 |t Vol. 28, No. 2  |v [P. 249-259]  |d 2021 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a absolute myocardial blood flow 
610 1 |a coronary flow reserve 
610 1 |a CZT camera 
610 1 |a fractional flow reserve 
610 1 |a визуализация 
610 1 |a кровоток 
610 1 |a миокард 
610 1 |a сканирование 
610 1 |a изображения 
610 1 |a изображения 
701 1 |a Zavadovsky  |b K. V.  |g Konstantin Valerjevich 
701 1 |a Mochula  |b A. V.  |g Andrey Viktorovich 
701 1 |a Boshchenko  |b A. A.  |g Alla Aleksandrovna 
701 1 |a Vrublevsky  |b A. V.  |g Aleksandr Viktorovich 
701 1 |a Baev  |b A. E.  |g Andrey Evgenjevich 
701 1 |a Krylov  |b A. L.  |g Aleksandr Lyubomirovich 
701 1 |a Gulya  |b M. O.  |g Marina Olegovna 
701 1 |a Nesterov  |b E. A.  |c Physicist, Specialist in the field of nuclear power engineering  |c Researcher of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1976-  |g Evgeny Alexandrovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\32657  |9 16556 
701 1 |a Liga  |b R.  |g Riccardo 
701 1 |a Gimelli  |b A.  |g Alessia 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Инженерная школа информационных технологий и робототехники  |b Отделение информационных технологий  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23515 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20211228  |g RCR 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01678-z 
942 |c CF