Methodology of Cross-Cultural Description of Speech Behaviour:A Case Study of INVITATION in German and Russian Discourse; GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies; Vol. 21, No. 1
| Parent link: | GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies Vol. 21, No. 1.— 2021.— [P. 1-19] |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Corporate Author: | |
| Summary: | Title screen The article aims to demonstrate a consistent methodology for conducting cross-culturalresearch of verbal communication behaviour and identifying its peculiarities in differentlanguage cultures. First of all, the author discusses the problem of defining a basic unit ofcommunication crucial for the analysis of communicative behaviour and proposes her owninterpretation of such a unit called speech behaviour pattern (SBP). The illocutionary contentand general organization of any SBP is considered universal, while their actual realization in alanguage is culturally conditioned and therefore may vary significantly in different languages.Utterances that constitute a certain SBP are organized into a field with a prototypical centreand a gradationally formed periphery, which is referred to as communicative-pragmatic field(CPF). The proposed methodology of contrastive analysis includes the following four majorcomponents: 1) definition of illocutionary purpose, 2) description of structural forms of SBP(i.e., their lexical and grammatical characteristics), 3) identifying communicative-pragmaticfactors, 4) description of the structure and hierarchy of the communicative-pragmatic field thatincludes utterances implementing SBP. The presented approach is then consistently applied tothe analysis of the SBP of INVITATION in the Russian and German discourse. The language dataare taken from the existing Russian and German corpora. The proposed methodology helps toidentify the main similarities and differences in the implementation of the SBP INVITATION inRussian and German driven by grammatical and communicative-pragmatic factors. |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2101-01 |
| Format: | MixedMaterials Electronic Book Chapter |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=664116 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa0a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 664116 | ||
| 005 | 20250425132437.0 | ||
| 035 | |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\35300 | ||
| 035 | |a RU\TPU\network\33273 | ||
| 090 | |a 664116 | ||
| 100 | |a 20210329d2021 k||y0rusy50 ba | ||
| 101 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 135 | |a drgn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | |a i | |
| 182 | 0 | |a b | |
| 200 | 1 | |a Methodology of Cross-Cultural Description of Speech Behaviour:A Case Study of INVITATION in German and Russian Discourse |f E. G. Kotorova | |
| 203 | |a Text |c electronic | ||
| 300 | |a Title screen | ||
| 330 | |a The article aims to demonstrate a consistent methodology for conducting cross-culturalresearch of verbal communication behaviour and identifying its peculiarities in differentlanguage cultures. First of all, the author discusses the problem of defining a basic unit ofcommunication crucial for the analysis of communicative behaviour and proposes her owninterpretation of such a unit called speech behaviour pattern (SBP). The illocutionary contentand general organization of any SBP is considered universal, while their actual realization in alanguage is culturally conditioned and therefore may vary significantly in different languages.Utterances that constitute a certain SBP are organized into a field with a prototypical centreand a gradationally formed periphery, which is referred to as communicative-pragmatic field(CPF). The proposed methodology of contrastive analysis includes the following four majorcomponents: 1) definition of illocutionary purpose, 2) description of structural forms of SBP(i.e., their lexical and grammatical characteristics), 3) identifying communicative-pragmaticfactors, 4) description of the structure and hierarchy of the communicative-pragmatic field thatincludes utterances implementing SBP. The presented approach is then consistently applied tothe analysis of the SBP of INVITATION in the Russian and German discourse. The language dataare taken from the existing Russian and German corpora. The proposed methodology helps toidentify the main similarities and differences in the implementation of the SBP INVITATION inRussian and German driven by grammatical and communicative-pragmatic factors. | ||
| 461 | |t GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies | ||
| 463 | |t Vol. 21, No. 1 |v [P. 1-19] |d 2021 | ||
| 610 | 1 | |a электронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a труды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | |a speech behaviour | |
| 610 | 1 | |a cross-cultural communication | |
| 610 | 1 | |a contrastive analysis | |
| 610 | 1 | |a Russian | |
| 610 | 1 | |a German | |
| 610 | 1 | |a речевое поведение | |
| 610 | 1 | |a межкультурное общение | |
| 610 | 1 | |a сравнительный анализ | |
| 610 | 1 | |a русский язык | |
| 610 | 1 | |a немецкий язык | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kotorova |b E. G. |c linguist |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of philological sciences |f 1954- |g Elizaveta Georgievna |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\35766 | |
| 712 | 0 | 2 | |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет |b Школа базовой инженерной подготовки |b Отделение иностранных языков |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23510 |
| 801 | 0 | |a RU |b 63413507 |c 20210329 |g RCR | |
| 850 | |a 63413507 | ||
| 856 | 4 | |u http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2101-01 | |
| 942 | |c CF | ||