Determination of bubble point pressure & oil formation volume factor of crude oils applying multiple hidden layers extreme learning machine algorithms; Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering; Vol. 202

Bibliographic Details
Parent link:Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
Vol. 202.— 2021.— [108425, 29 p.]
Corporate Author: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Инженерная школа природных ресурсов Отделение нефтегазового дела
Other Authors: Rashidi S. Sina, Mohammad M. Mehrad, Ghorbani H. Hamzeh, Wood D. David, Mohamadian N. Nima, Moghadasi J. Jamshid, Davoodi Sh. Shadfar
Summary:Title screen
An important requirement of reservoir management is to understand the properties of reservoir fluids and dependent phase behaviors. This makes it possible to determine the properties of reservoir fluids in laboratory pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) tests. Such laboratory tests are costly and time consuming, and reservoir data are sometimes not available. When estimating the in-place fluid volumes and/or designing enhanced recovery processes information on bubble point pressure (BPP) and oil formation volume factor (OFVF) is required. Predicting these two parameters is therefore one of the priorities of reservoir engineers. It is becoming increasingly beneficial to be able to predict BPP and OFVF with efficient machine-learning algorithms based on underlying variables that are more easily measured directly in the field. In this study, a dataset of 638 data records of published crude oil fluid samples from around the world is evaluated. After filtering the dataset for outliers, 591 data records for BPP and 599 datasets for OFVF are evaluated with efficient hybrid machine-learning algorithms (multi-layer extreme learning machine --MELM-- and least squares support vector machine -- LSSVM) optimized using a genetic algorithm –GA-- and a particle swarm optimizer –PSO-- to improve their prediction performance. Four underlying variables are considered for each data record: temperature (T), solution gas oil ratio (Rs), gas specific gravity (?g) and oil gravity (API). The PSO- MELM-PSO hybrid algorithm achieved the highest prediction accuracy measured in terms of root mean square errors (RMSE) of 33.5 psi for BPP and 0.0199 for OFVF. The four-hybrid machine-learning-optimization algorithms evaluated all outperform the empirical relationships used for many decades in the oil industry to predict BPP and OFVF.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108425
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=663659

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 663659
005 20250515094724.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\34829 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\34052 
090 |a 663659 
100 |a 20210224d2021 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a NL 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Determination of bubble point pressure & oil formation volume factor of crude oils applying multiple hidden layers extreme learning machine algorithms  |f S. Rashidi, M. Mohammad, H. Ghorbani [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
330 |a An important requirement of reservoir management is to understand the properties of reservoir fluids and dependent phase behaviors. This makes it possible to determine the properties of reservoir fluids in laboratory pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) tests. Such laboratory tests are costly and time consuming, and reservoir data are sometimes not available. When estimating the in-place fluid volumes and/or designing enhanced recovery processes information on bubble point pressure (BPP) and oil formation volume factor (OFVF) is required. Predicting these two parameters is therefore one of the priorities of reservoir engineers. It is becoming increasingly beneficial to be able to predict BPP and OFVF with efficient machine-learning algorithms based on underlying variables that are more easily measured directly in the field. In this study, a dataset of 638 data records of published crude oil fluid samples from around the world is evaluated. After filtering the dataset for outliers, 591 data records for BPP and 599 datasets for OFVF are evaluated with efficient hybrid machine-learning algorithms (multi-layer extreme learning machine --MELM-- and least squares support vector machine -- LSSVM) optimized using a genetic algorithm –GA-- and a particle swarm optimizer –PSO-- to improve their prediction performance. Four underlying variables are considered for each data record: temperature (T), solution gas oil ratio (Rs), gas specific gravity (?g) and oil gravity (API). The PSO- MELM-PSO hybrid algorithm achieved the highest prediction accuracy measured in terms of root mean square errors (RMSE) of 33.5 psi for BPP and 0.0199 for OFVF. The four-hybrid machine-learning-optimization algorithms evaluated all outperform the empirical relationships used for many decades in the oil industry to predict BPP and OFVF. 
333 |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса 
461 |t Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 
463 |t Vol. 202  |v [108425, 29 p.]  |d 2021 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a oil formation volume factor 
610 1 |a bubble point pressure 
610 1 |a multi-layer extreme learning machine 
610 1 |a hybrid machine learning algorithms 
610 1 |a least squares support vector machine 
701 1 |a Rashidi  |b S.  |g Sina 
701 1 |a Mohammad  |b M.  |g Mehrad 
701 1 |a Ghorbani  |b H.  |g Hamzeh 
701 1 |a Wood  |b D.  |g David 
701 1 |a Mohamadian  |b N.  |g Nima 
701 1 |a Moghadasi  |b J.  |g Jamshid 
701 1 |a Davoodi  |b Sh.  |c specialist in the field of petroleum engineering  |c Research Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1990-  |g Shadfar  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\46542  |9 22200 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Инженерная школа природных ресурсов  |b Отделение нефтегазового дела  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23546 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20210930  |g RCR 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108425 
942 |c CF