Performance of Two Types of High Speed, High EfficiencyAxisymmetric Intakes; Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanics; Vol. 7, iss. 1

Manylion Llyfryddiaeth
Parent link:Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanics
Vol. 7, iss. 1.— 2021.— [P. 93-101]
Awdur Corfforaethol: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Инженерная школа природных ресурсов Отделение нефтегазового дела
Awduron Eraill: Galkin V. M. Vladislav Mikhailovich, Fomin V. M. Vasily Mikhaylovich, Sannu M. Molder, Vnuchkov D. A. Dmitry Aleksandrovich, Zvegintsev V. I. Valery Ivanovich
Crynodeb:Title screen
Performance of two axisymmetric air intakes are compared at conditions suitable for Mach number range from 2 to 8.First is the Busemann intake and second is the reversed isentropic nozzle. The isentropic nozzle is built by the method ofcharacteristics. The contour of this nozzle is taken as a compression surface for the incoming flow. Performances of these twointakes are compared by comparison of both viscous and inviscid CFD calculations at Mach 6. Viscous flow calculations showthat the total pressure recovery in compression section is 0.8316 in the Busemann intake and 0.869 in the reversed isentropicnozzle intake.
Iaith:Saesneg
Cyhoeddwyd: 2021
Pynciau:
Mynediad Ar-lein:https://dx.doi.org/10.22055/jacm.2020.35250.2609
Fformat: Electronig Pennod Llyfr
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=663019

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 663019
005 20250421131830.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\34188 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\17730 
090 |a 663019 
100 |a 20210120d2021 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Performance of Two Types of High Speed, High EfficiencyAxisymmetric Intakes  |f V. M. Galkin, V. M. Fomin, M. Sannu [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
330 |a Performance of two axisymmetric air intakes are compared at conditions suitable for Mach number range from 2 to 8.First is the Busemann intake and second is the reversed isentropic nozzle. The isentropic nozzle is built by the method ofcharacteristics. The contour of this nozzle is taken as a compression surface for the incoming flow. Performances of these twointakes are compared by comparison of both viscous and inviscid CFD calculations at Mach 6. Viscous flow calculations showthat the total pressure recovery in compression section is 0.8316 in the Busemann intake and 0.869 in the reversed isentropicnozzle intake. 
461 |t Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanics 
463 |t Vol. 7, iss. 1  |v [P. 93-101]  |d 2021 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a supersonic 
610 1 |a air intake 
610 1 |a near-isentropic compression 
610 1 |a total pressure recoveryý 
701 1 |a Galkin  |b V. M.  |c Geologist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of physical and mathematical sciences  |f 1955-  |g Vladislav Mikhailovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31674  |9 15811 
701 1 |a Fomin  |b V. M.  |c физик  |c действительный член РАН (2006), директор ИТПМ СО РАН (с 1989 г.), доктор физико-математических наук (1984), профессор (1987)  |f 1940-  |g Vasily Mikhaylovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33496 
701 1 |a Sannu  |b M.  |g Molder 
701 1 |a Vnuchkov  |b D. A.  |g Dmitry Aleksandrovich 
701 1 |a Zvegintsev  |b V. I.  |g Valery Ivanovich 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Инженерная школа природных ресурсов  |b Отделение нефтегазового дела  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23546 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20210120  |g RCR 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 |u https://dx.doi.org/10.22055/jacm.2020.35250.2609 
942 |c CF