The impact of post manufacturing treatment of functionally graded Ti6Al4V scaffolds on their surface morphology and mechanical strength; Journal of Materials Research and Technology; Vol. 9, iss. 2

Detaylı Bibliyografya
Parent link:Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Vol. 9, iss. 2.— 2020.— [P. 1866-1881]
Müşterek Yazar: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Исследовательская школа химических и биомедицинских технологий Научно-исследовательский центр "Физическое материаловедение и композитные материалы"
Diğer Yazarlar: Khrapov D. Dmitriy, Koptyug A. V. Andrey Valentinovich, Manabaev K. K. Kairat Kamitovich, Leonard F. Fabien, Mishurova T. Tatiana, Bruno G., Cheneler D., Loza K. Kateryna, Epple M. Matthias, Surmenev R. A. Roman Anatolievich, Surmeneva M. A. Maria Alexandrovna
Özet:Title screen
An ultrasonic vibration post-treatment procedure was suggested for additively manufactured lattices. The aim of the present research was to investigate mechanical properties and the differences in mechanical behavior and fracture modes of Ti6Al4V scaffolds treated with traditional powder recovery system (PRS) and ultrasound vibration (USV). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to investigate the strut surface and the fracture surface morphology. X-ray computed tomography (CT) was employed to evaluate the inner structure, strut dimensions, pore size, as well as the surface morphology of additively manufactured porous scaffolds. Uniaxial compression tests were conducted to obtain elastic modulus, compressive ultimate strength and yield stress. Finite element analysis was performed for a body-centered cubic (BCC) element-based model and for CT-based reconstruction data, as well as for a two-zone scaffold model to evaluate stress distribution during elastic deformation. The scaffold with PRS post treatment displayed ductile behavior, while USV treated scaffold displayed fragile behavior. Double barrel formation of PRS treated scaffold was observed during deformation. Finite element analysis for the CT-based reconstruction revealed the strong impact of surface morphology on the stress distribution in comparison with BCC cell model because of partially molten metal particles on the surface of struts, which usually remain unstressed.
Dil:İngilizce
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: 2020
Konular:
Online Erişim:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.12.019
Materyal Türü: Elektronik Kitap Bölümü
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=662531

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 662531
005 20250404132252.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\33686 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\31259 
090 |a 662531 
100 |a 20200828d2020 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a The impact of post manufacturing treatment of functionally graded Ti6Al4V scaffolds on their surface morphology and mechanical strength  |f D. Khrapov, A. V. Koptyug, K. K. Manabaev [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: 48 tit.] 
330 |a An ultrasonic vibration post-treatment procedure was suggested for additively manufactured lattices. The aim of the present research was to investigate mechanical properties and the differences in mechanical behavior and fracture modes of Ti6Al4V scaffolds treated with traditional powder recovery system (PRS) and ultrasound vibration (USV). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to investigate the strut surface and the fracture surface morphology. X-ray computed tomography (CT) was employed to evaluate the inner structure, strut dimensions, pore size, as well as the surface morphology of additively manufactured porous scaffolds. Uniaxial compression tests were conducted to obtain elastic modulus, compressive ultimate strength and yield stress. Finite element analysis was performed for a body-centered cubic (BCC) element-based model and for CT-based reconstruction data, as well as for a two-zone scaffold model to evaluate stress distribution during elastic deformation. The scaffold with PRS post treatment displayed ductile behavior, while USV treated scaffold displayed fragile behavior. Double barrel formation of PRS treated scaffold was observed during deformation. Finite element analysis for the CT-based reconstruction revealed the strong impact of surface morphology on the stress distribution in comparison with BCC cell model because of partially molten metal particles on the surface of struts, which usually remain unstressed. 
461 |t Journal of Materials Research and Technology 
463 |t Vol. 9, iss. 2  |v [P. 1866-1881]  |d 2020 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a additive manufacturing 
610 1 |a electron beam melting 
610 1 |a titanium alloy 
610 1 |a compression testing 
610 1 |a scaffold 
610 1 |a powder removal 
610 1 |a finite element analysis 
610 1 |a X-ray computed tomography 
610 1 |a производство 
610 1 |a добавки 
610 1 |a электронно-лучевая плавка 
610 1 |a титановые сплавы 
610 1 |a тестирование 
610 1 |a сжатие 
610 1 |a строительные леса 
610 1 |a конечные элементы 
610 1 |a рентгеновская компьютерная томография 
701 1 |a Khrapov  |b D.  |c Specialist in the field of nuclear technologies  |c Research Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1993-  |g Dmitriy  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\43119  |9 21619 
701 1 |a Koptyug  |b A. V.  |g Andrey Valentinovich 
701 1 |a Manabaev  |b K. K.  |c physicist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences  |f 1985-  |g Kairat Kamitovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\36301  |9 19375 
701 1 |a Leonard  |b F.  |g Fabien 
701 1 |a Mishurova  |b T.  |g Tatiana 
701 1 |a Bruno  |b G. 
701 1 |a Cheneler  |b D. 
701 1 |a Loza  |b K.  |g Kateryna 
701 1 |a Epple  |b M.  |g Matthias 
701 1 |a Surmenev  |b R. A.  |c physicist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Senior researcher, Candidate of physical and mathematical sciences  |f 1982-  |g Roman Anatolievich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31885  |9 15957 
701 1 |a Surmeneva  |b M. A.  |c specialist in the field of material science  |c engineer-researcher of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Associate Scientist  |f 1984-  |g Maria Alexandrovna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31894  |9 15966 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Исследовательская школа химических и биомедицинских технологий  |b Научно-исследовательский центр "Физическое материаловедение и композитные материалы"  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\24957  |9 28467 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20200828  |g RCR 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.12.019 
942 |c CF