Грамматическая организация протокола: дискурсивный аспект (на материале протоколов 1917 и 1918-1933 гг. Госархива Томской области); Вестник Томского государственного университета; № 453
| Parent link: | Вестник Томского государственного университета/ Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет (ТГУ).— , 1998- № 453.— 2020.— [С. 29-40] |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Autor Corporativo: | |
| Outros Autores: | |
| Resumo: | Заглавие с экрана Исследуется грамматическая организация текстов деловых протоколов двух периодов: 1917 и 1918–1933 гг. Цель – выявить «прерывность» грамматической организации протокола, обусловленную изменением социальной реальности. Основной метод исследования – контент-анализ. В результате определены параметры трансформации грамматической организации протоколов: переход от повествовательности к описательности, снижение значимости личностного начала, нивелирование модусных смыслов. The aim of the article is to identify quantitative characteristics of the grammatical organization of the text of the record in the aspect of the “discontinuity” of a discursive unity due to a change in social reality in the period from 1917 to 1933. Methodologically,the research is based on Michel Foucault’s thesis on the “discontinuity” of discursive formations within a discursive unity. Preservingthe unity of the basic function and transforming in the aspect of language specificity, document discourse allows us to argue thisthesis. The discursive approach makes it possible to reflect on the repercussions of social processes in the document corpus in a newway. Despite the function of fixing the sequence of real social events and their documentary proof, the record is scarcely investigatedin this aspect. The leading methodological approach is discourse analysis; the main method is automated content analysis. The material for analysis is the corpus of the records of Tomsk Governorate People’s Assembly dated by 1917 (25 documents, 91,686 wordusages) and the records of Tomsk institutions’ meetings dated from 1918 to 1933 (126 documents, 41,630 word usages). In thecourse of the study, it was revealed that the corpora have significant differences it terms of grammatical organization. In some ways,the corpus of 1918–1933 corresponds to a greater extent to the norms of modern official style: it contains fewer verbal lexis and pronouns, but has more impersonal verbs. At the same time, in the corpus of 1917, the modality of duty is expressed more consistently. On the one hand, one can speak about the greater manifestation of various modalities in the texts of the first corpus that is expressedin a more frequent use of modal particles. On the other hand, the analysis identified the parameters by which the corpora demonstratea significant similarity. This similarity is based on common language patterns. Non-derivative original prepositions dominate in bothcorpora. The most frequent are prepositions v/vo. Coordinating conjunctions are used more often than subordinating ones. This corresponds to the general common language trends. Consequently, it can be confirmed that the grammatical organization of the recordsdated by different historical periods demonstrates the "discontinuity" of the discursive unity and the corpora study can be consideredas different discursive formations. First of all, this "discontinuity" is caused by the changed social reality which reduced the manifestation of the personal element in the document text. The records dated by 1917 have a more detailed stenographic character. The textsrecord practically verbatim all discussions of members of Tomsk Governorate People's Assembly, their discussions on controversialissues concerning even the speaking order. The records dated by 1918-1933 are predominantly summaries of cases and decisionsmade by participants of meetings. |
| Idioma: | russo |
| Publicado em: |
2020
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Acesso em linha: | https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/453/4 |
| Formato: | MixedMaterials Recurso Electrónico Capítulo de Livro |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=662514 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa0a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 662514 | ||
| 005 | 20250404104941.0 | ||
| 035 | |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\33669 | ||
| 035 | |a RU\TPU\network\27728 | ||
| 090 | |a 662514 | ||
| 100 | |a 20200827d2020 k||y0rusy50 ca | ||
| 101 | 0 | |a rus | |
| 102 | |a RU | ||
| 135 | |a drcn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | |a i | |
| 182 | 0 | |a b | |
| 200 | 1 | |a Грамматическая организация протокола: дискурсивный аспект (на материале протоколов 1917 и 1918-1933 гг. Госархива Томской области) |d The Grammatical Organization of the Record: A Discursive Aspect (Based on Records of 1917 and 1918–1933 of the StateArchive of Tomsk Oblast) |f Н. А. Мишанкина, О. А. Черныш | |
| 203 | |a Текст |c электронный | ||
| 300 | |a Заглавие с экрана | ||
| 320 | |a [Библиогр.: 40 назв.] | ||
| 330 | |a Исследуется грамматическая организация текстов деловых протоколов двух периодов: 1917 и 1918–1933 гг. Цель – выявить «прерывность» грамматической организации протокола, обусловленную изменением социальной реальности. Основной метод исследования – контент-анализ. В результате определены параметры трансформации грамматической организации протоколов: переход от повествовательности к описательности, снижение значимости личностного начала, нивелирование модусных смыслов. | ||
| 330 | |a The aim of the article is to identify quantitative characteristics of the grammatical organization of the text of the record in the aspect of the “discontinuity” of a discursive unity due to a change in social reality in the period from 1917 to 1933. Methodologically,the research is based on Michel Foucault’s thesis on the “discontinuity” of discursive formations within a discursive unity. Preservingthe unity of the basic function and transforming in the aspect of language specificity, document discourse allows us to argue thisthesis. The discursive approach makes it possible to reflect on the repercussions of social processes in the document corpus in a newway. Despite the function of fixing the sequence of real social events and their documentary proof, the record is scarcely investigatedin this aspect. The leading methodological approach is discourse analysis; the main method is automated content analysis. The material for analysis is the corpus of the records of Tomsk Governorate People’s Assembly dated by 1917 (25 documents, 91,686 wordusages) and the records of Tomsk institutions’ meetings dated from 1918 to 1933 (126 documents, 41,630 word usages). In thecourse of the study, it was revealed that the corpora have significant differences it terms of grammatical organization. In some ways,the corpus of 1918–1933 corresponds to a greater extent to the norms of modern official style: it contains fewer verbal lexis and pronouns, but has more impersonal verbs. At the same time, in the corpus of 1917, the modality of duty is expressed more consistently. | ||
| 330 | |a On the one hand, one can speak about the greater manifestation of various modalities in the texts of the first corpus that is expressedin a more frequent use of modal particles. On the other hand, the analysis identified the parameters by which the corpora demonstratea significant similarity. This similarity is based on common language patterns. Non-derivative original prepositions dominate in bothcorpora. The most frequent are prepositions v/vo. Coordinating conjunctions are used more often than subordinating ones. This corresponds to the general common language trends. Consequently, it can be confirmed that the grammatical organization of the recordsdated by different historical periods demonstrates the "discontinuity" of the discursive unity and the corpora study can be consideredas different discursive formations. First of all, this "discontinuity" is caused by the changed social reality which reduced the manifestation of the personal element in the document text. The records dated by 1917 have a more detailed stenographic character. The textsrecord practically verbatim all discussions of members of Tomsk Governorate People's Assembly, their discussions on controversialissues concerning even the speaking order. The records dated by 1918-1933 are predominantly summaries of cases and decisionsmade by participants of meetings. | ||
| 461 | |t Вестник Томского государственного университета |f Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет (ТГУ) |d 1998- | ||
| 463 | |t № 453 |v [С. 29-40] |d 2020 | ||
| 510 | 1 | |a The Grammatical Organization of the Record: A Discursive Aspect (Based on Records of 1917 and 1918–1933 of the StateArchive of Tomsk Oblast) |z eng | |
| 610 | 1 | |a электронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a труды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | |a дискурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a протоколы | |
| 610 | 1 | |a дискурсивные формы | |
| 610 | 1 | |a прерывность | |
| 610 | 1 | |a контент-анализ | |
| 610 | 1 | |a грамматическая индукция | |
| 610 | 1 | |a Томская губерния | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Мишанкина |b Н. А. |c лингвист |c профессор Томского политехнического университета, доктор филологических наук |f 1969- |g Наталья Александровна |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\28712 |9 13509 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Черныш |b О. А. |c специалист в области организации высшего профессионального образования |c эксперт Томского политехнического университета |f 1989- |g Ольга Андреевна |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\36657 |9 19696 | |
| 712 | 0 | 2 | |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет |b Школа базовой инженерной подготовки |b Отделение русского языка |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23517 |9 28333 |
| 801 | 2 | |a RU |b 63413507 |c 20200827 |g RCR | |
| 856 | 4 | |u https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/453/4 | |
| 942 | |c CF | ||