|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000naa0a2200000 4500 |
| 001 |
662474 |
| 005 |
20250812112732.0 |
| 035 |
|
|
|a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\33629
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a RU\TPU\network\19243
|
| 090 |
|
|
|a 662474
|
| 100 |
|
|
|a 20200820d2019 k y0engy50 ba
|
| 101 |
0 |
|
|a eng
|
| 135 |
|
|
|a drcn ---uucaa
|
| 181 |
|
0 |
|a i
|
| 182 |
|
0 |
|a b
|
| 200 |
1 |
|
|a A consensus ranking based proposal for combining data in adjustment of the fundamental physical constant values
|f L. I. Khudonogova, S. V. Muravyov (Murav’ev)
|
| 203 |
|
|
|a Text
|c electronic
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a Title screen
|
| 320 |
|
|
|a [References: 14 tit.]
|
| 330 |
|
|
|a To ensure the traceability of testing and diagnostic equipment it is necessary to provide a chain of comparisons connecting the equipment with primary standards of the SI units based on fundamental physical constants. The values of the constants are regularly determined by an adjustment procedure which requires consistency of input data and an assumed statistical model. In this paper, it is proposed to apply the developed interval fusion with preference aggregation (IF&PA) method for combining data and determining a consensus value of a fundamental constant. Due to its high robustness, accuracy and reliability confirmed by the numerical experimental results, the IF&PA does not require a consistency check and works well without using any statistical assumptions. Usage of the IF&PA is demonstrated by example of processing the simulated interval data and real values of the Planck constant used in the adjustment in 2006 and 2017. The outcome comparison with the estimates obtained by other methods, including the procedures based on Birge ratio, modified Birge ratio, random effects model and fixed effects model, is carried out.
|
| 463 |
|
|
|t Testing, Diagnostics & Inspection as a comprehensive value chain for Quality & Safety
|o Proceedings of the 16th IMEKO TC10 Conference, Berlin, September 3-4, 2019
|v [P. 125-130]
|d 2019
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a электронный ресурс
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a труды учёных ТПУ
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a fundamental constant adjustment
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a consensus estimate
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a ranking
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a data fusion
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a preference
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a aggregation
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a рейтинги
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a консенсусы
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a агрегация
|
| 700 |
|
1 |
|a Muravyov (Murav’ev)
|b S. V.
|c specialist in the field of control and measurement equipment
|c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University,Doctor of technical sciences
|f 1954-
|g Sergey Vasilyevich
|3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31262
|9 15440
|
| 701 |
|
1 |
|a Khudonogova
|b L. I.
|c specialist in the field of informatics and computer technology
|c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Technical Sciences
|f 1989-
|g Ludmila Igorevna
|3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\32893
|9 16741
|
| 712 |
0 |
2 |
|a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет
|b Инженерная школа информационных технологий и робототехники
|b Отделение автоматизации и робототехники
|3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23553
|
| 801 |
|
2 |
|a RU
|b 63413507
|c 20200820
|g RCR
|
| 856 |
4 |
|
|u https://www.imeko.org/publications/tc10-2019/IMEKO-TC10-2019-019.pdf
|
| 942 |
|
|
|c CF
|
