The relevance of mixed methods for network analysis in tourism and hospitality research; International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management; Vol. 32, iss. 4

Dades bibliogràfiques
Parent link:International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
Vol. 32, iss. 4.— 2020.— [P. 1643-1673]
Autor principal: Mariani M. Marcello
Autor corporatiu: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Школа базовой инженерной подготовки Отделение социально-гуманитарных наук
Altres autors: Baggio R. Rodolfo
Sumari:Title screen
Purpose Taking stock of extant hospitality and tourism research using social network analysis approaches, this study highlights why using either quantitative or qualitative approaches to examine social networks can be misleading and generate potentially biased findings. Indeed, purely qualitative and purely quantitative studies display limitations. The purpose of this study is to provide methodological insights by suggesting that mixed methods can be suitably used, depending on the specific research questions. Design/methodology/approach The study consists of an analysis and critical discussion of the methods used in a number of papers leveraging social network approaches to study social networks in tourism and hospitality. The authors describe the benefits and limitations of each method studies considered are examined based on a number of aspects.
Findings More than half of the studies classified as network studies adopt quantitative designs and quantitative methods including statistical analyses and observational data. Mixed methods study is a minority and they are almost never labeled as mixed methods. A relevant portion of qualitative studies increasingly embeds a number of rudimentary statistical analyses. With an example, the authors also discuss that purely quantitative or purely qualitative methods can lead to discrepant results, and thus, the authors encourage scholars to embrace mixed method research designs such as explanatory or exploratory sequential designs. Advanced researchers might attempt in the future to embrace transformative, embedded or multiphase mixed methods. Research limitations/implications This study is based on academic papers and research published before 2019. A rich research agenda is designed. Originality/value This study contributes to explore the way social networks have been dealt with in tourism and hospitality research so far, by advancing a proposal to adopt mixed methods in the form of explanatory or exploratory sequential designs. To the best of the knowledge, it is the first study addressing methodological pitfalls in extant network-based research within the tourism and hospitality domain.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
Idioma:anglès
Publicat: 2020
Matèries:
Accés en línia:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2019-0378
Format: MixedMaterials Electrònic Capítol de llibre
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=662293

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 662293
005 20250407161917.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\33430 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\31449 
090 |a 662293 
100 |a 20200709d2020 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a The relevance of mixed methods for network analysis in tourism and hospitality research  |f M. Mariani, R. Baggio 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
330 |a Purpose Taking stock of extant hospitality and tourism research using social network analysis approaches, this study highlights why using either quantitative or qualitative approaches to examine social networks can be misleading and generate potentially biased findings. Indeed, purely qualitative and purely quantitative studies display limitations. The purpose of this study is to provide methodological insights by suggesting that mixed methods can be suitably used, depending on the specific research questions. Design/methodology/approach The study consists of an analysis and critical discussion of the methods used in a number of papers leveraging social network approaches to study social networks in tourism and hospitality. The authors describe the benefits and limitations of each method studies considered are examined based on a number of aspects. 
330 |a Findings More than half of the studies classified as network studies adopt quantitative designs and quantitative methods including statistical analyses and observational data. Mixed methods study is a minority and they are almost never labeled as mixed methods. A relevant portion of qualitative studies increasingly embeds a number of rudimentary statistical analyses. With an example, the authors also discuss that purely quantitative or purely qualitative methods can lead to discrepant results, and thus, the authors encourage scholars to embrace mixed method research designs such as explanatory or exploratory sequential designs. Advanced researchers might attempt in the future to embrace transformative, embedded or multiphase mixed methods. Research limitations/implications This study is based on academic papers and research published before 2019. A rich research agenda is designed. Originality/value This study contributes to explore the way social networks have been dealt with in tourism and hospitality research so far, by advancing a proposal to adopt mixed methods in the form of explanatory or exploratory sequential designs. To the best of the knowledge, it is the first study addressing methodological pitfalls in extant network-based research within the tourism and hospitality domain. 
333 |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса 
461 |t International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 
463 |t Vol. 32, iss. 4  |v [P. 1643-1673]  |d 2020 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a tourism 
610 1 |a туризм 
610 1 |a network analysis 
610 1 |a сетевой анализ 
610 1 |a quantitative methods 
610 1 |a количественные методы 
610 1 |a hospitality 
610 1 |a гостеприимство 
610 1 |a mixed methods 
700 1 |a Mariani  |b M.  |g Marcello 
701 1 |a Baggio  |b R.  |c Italian expert, philosopher  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, candidate of philosophical Sciences  |f 1951-  |g Rodolfo  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\39762 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Школа базовой инженерной подготовки  |b Отделение социально-гуманитарных наук  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23512 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20200709  |g RCR 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2019-0378 
942 |c CF