Epistemological Field and Constellation of Fact in Wittgenstein’s and Popper’s Philosophy; Axiomathes; Vol. 30, iss. 3
| Parent link: | Axiomathes Vol. 30, iss. 3.— 2020.— [P. 327-346] |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Körperschaft: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | Title screen In this article, a comparative analysis of Karl Popper’s falsifiability theory and Ludwig Wittgenstein’s theory of meaning in the context of the historical-philosophical approach to the problem of new knowledge formation and justification is undertaken. An assumption is made that the constellation of fact is connected with the possibility of the emergence of an epistemological field. Researchers have repeatedly addressed this issue; however, one important detail received no due attention: Popper’s counter-arguments regarding Wittgenstein’s view on semantic paradoxes show the fundamental difference of these philosophers’ views on the sign and the signified (language and world), which contributes to the analysis of new knowledge formation. Arguments that concern both early and late periods of Wittgenstein’s philosophy are used in this study. The uncertainty of the demarcation criterion (according to Popper) allowed analyzing Wittgenstein’s position as to how and why different rules of inference form different epistemological fields. Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2020
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-019-09458-7 |
| Format: | MixedMaterials Elektronisch Buchkapitel |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=662128 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa0a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 662128 | ||
| 005 | 20250422152921.0 | ||
| 035 | |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\33262 | ||
| 035 | |a RU\TPU\network\28873 | ||
| 090 | |a 662128 | ||
| 100 | |a 20200520d2020 k||y0rusy50 ba | ||
| 101 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 135 | |a drgn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | |a i | |
| 182 | 0 | |a b | |
| 200 | 1 | |a Epistemological Field and Constellation of Fact in Wittgenstein’s and Popper’s Philosophy |f M. V. Goncharenko | |
| 203 | |a Text |c electronic | ||
| 300 | |a Title screen | ||
| 330 | |a In this article, a comparative analysis of Karl Popper’s falsifiability theory and Ludwig Wittgenstein’s theory of meaning in the context of the historical-philosophical approach to the problem of new knowledge formation and justification is undertaken. An assumption is made that the constellation of fact is connected with the possibility of the emergence of an epistemological field. Researchers have repeatedly addressed this issue; however, one important detail received no due attention: Popper’s counter-arguments regarding Wittgenstein’s view on semantic paradoxes show the fundamental difference of these philosophers’ views on the sign and the signified (language and world), which contributes to the analysis of new knowledge formation. Arguments that concern both early and late periods of Wittgenstein’s philosophy are used in this study. The uncertainty of the demarcation criterion (according to Popper) allowed analyzing Wittgenstein’s position as to how and why different rules of inference form different epistemological fields. | ||
| 333 | |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса | ||
| 461 | |t Axiomathes | ||
| 463 | |t Vol. 30, iss. 3 |v [P. 327-346] |d 2020 | ||
| 610 | 1 | |a электронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a труды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | |a fact | |
| 610 | 1 | |a epistemological field | |
| 610 | 1 | |a wittgenstein | |
| 610 | 1 | |a popper | |
| 610 | 1 | |a theory of meaning | |
| 610 | 1 | |a falsifiability theory | |
| 610 | 1 | |a факты | |
| 610 | 1 | |a эпистемология | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Goncharenko |b M. V. |c specialist in the field of psychology and pedagogy |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences |f 1973- |g Mark Vasilievich |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33597 | |
| 712 | 0 | 2 | |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) |b Школа базовой инженерной подготовки (ШБИП) |b Отделение социально-гуманитарных наук (ОСГН) |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23512 |
| 801 | 2 | |a RU |b 63413507 |c 20200520 |g RCR | |
| 850 | |a 63413507 | ||
| 856 | 4 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-019-09458-7 | |
| 942 | |c CF | ||