Comparative analysis of factors affecting differences in the concentrations of gaseous anthropogenic emissions from coal and slurry fuel combustion; Fuel; Vol. 270

Détails bibliographiques
Parent link:Fuel
Vol. 270.— 2020.— [117581, 13 p.]
Auteur principal: Akhmetshin M. R. Mark Rustamovich
Collectivités auteurs: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Инженерная школа энергетики Научно-образовательный центр И. Н. Бутакова (НОЦ И. Н. Бутакова), Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Исследовательская школа физики высокоэнергетических процессов
Autres auteurs: Nyashina G. S. Galina Sergeevna, Strizhak P. A. Pavel Alexandrovich
Résumé:Title screen
The paper presents the results of the experimental research performed for a comparative analysis of factors that influence the concentrations of the main gaseous anthropogenic emissions from coal and waste-based slurry fuel combustion. We focus on controlling the NOx and SO2 concentrations. We have researched for the first time a group of mechanisms and factors, influencing the formation of anthropogenic emissions from burning waste as part of wet multi-component slurry fuels. The experiments were conducted with coals of different grades, coal processing waste, water-containing slurries, as well as extra additives of biomass and waste. We show how much the NOx and SO2 concentrations are affected by a wide group of factors and processes: temperature in the chamber, vaporization, initial content of sulfur and nitrogen in the fuel mixture, specialized additives with different concentrations and in different combinations, as well as specific chemical reactions in a limited range of temperatures. The experimental results show that the initial content of nitrogen in the slurry and the catalytic processes of nitrogen oxide reduction to free N2 have a dominant influence on NOx emissions due to free hydrogen radicals and interaction of additives with the components (e.g., with Fe2O3). SO2 concentrations are decisively influenced by the content of sulfur in the slurry, as well as the chemical interactions of amphoteric and active metals with sulfur oxides. Combined employment of a group of factors under study can provide a reduction of NOx and SO2 by up to 80% as compared to coal combustion conditions.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
Langue:anglais
Publié: 2020
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117581
Format: MixedMaterials Électronique Chapitre de livre
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=662050

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 662050
005 20250421153955.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\33183 
090 |a 662050 
100 |a 20200512d2020 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a NL 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Comparative analysis of factors affecting differences in the concentrations of gaseous anthropogenic emissions from coal and slurry fuel combustion  |f M. R. Akhmetshin, G. S. Nyashina, P. A. Strizhak 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
330 |a The paper presents the results of the experimental research performed for a comparative analysis of factors that influence the concentrations of the main gaseous anthropogenic emissions from coal and waste-based slurry fuel combustion. We focus on controlling the NOx and SO2 concentrations. We have researched for the first time a group of mechanisms and factors, influencing the formation of anthropogenic emissions from burning waste as part of wet multi-component slurry fuels. The experiments were conducted with coals of different grades, coal processing waste, water-containing slurries, as well as extra additives of biomass and waste. We show how much the NOx and SO2 concentrations are affected by a wide group of factors and processes: temperature in the chamber, vaporization, initial content of sulfur and nitrogen in the fuel mixture, specialized additives with different concentrations and in different combinations, as well as specific chemical reactions in a limited range of temperatures. The experimental results show that the initial content of nitrogen in the slurry and the catalytic processes of nitrogen oxide reduction to free N2 have a dominant influence on NOx emissions due to free hydrogen radicals and interaction of additives with the components (e.g., with Fe2O3). SO2 concentrations are decisively influenced by the content of sulfur in the slurry, as well as the chemical interactions of amphoteric and active metals with sulfur oxides. Combined employment of a group of factors under study can provide a reduction of NOx and SO2 by up to 80% as compared to coal combustion conditions. 
333 |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса 
461 |t Fuel 
463 |t Vol. 270  |v [117581, 13 p.]  |d 2020 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a coal 
610 1 |a coal processing waste 
610 1 |a fuel slurries 
610 1 |a combustion 
610 1 |a anthropogenic emissions 
610 1 |a synergistic effects 
610 1 |a уголь 
610 1 |a отходы 
610 1 |a топливные суспензии 
610 1 |a сгорание 
610 1 |a антропогенные выбросы 
700 1 |a Akhmetshin  |b M. R.  |g Mark Rustamovich 
701 1 |a Nyashina  |b G. S.  |c specialist in the field of heat and power engineering  |c Assistant to Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Technical Sciences  |f 1992-  |g Galina Sergeevna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\35843  |9 18988 
701 1 |a Strizhak  |b P. A.  |c Specialist in the field of heat power energy  |c Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences (DSc), Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU)  |f 1985-  |g Pavel Alexandrovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\30871  |9 15117 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Инженерная школа энергетики  |b Научно-образовательный центр И. Н. Бутакова (НОЦ И. Н. Бутакова)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23504 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Исследовательская школа физики высокоэнергетических процессов  |c (2017- )  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23551 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20200512  |g RCR 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117581 
942 |c CF