К вопросу о периодизации истории музейного дела России; Вестник Томского государственного университета. Культурология и искусствоведение; № 34
| Parent link: | Вестник Томского государственного университета. Культурология и искусствоведение № 34.— 2019.— [С. 197-204] |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Autor corporatiu: | |
| Altres autors: | |
| Sumari: | Заглавие с экрана Рассматривается недостаточно изученная тема членения истории российского музейного Дела на периоды. Показано, что в продолжение 1930-1980-х гг. периоДизация музейной истории строилась на основе формационной теории общественного развития. Со сменой парадигмы музееведения в 1990-х гг. были начаты разработки новых моделей периодизации. Обращение к принципам периодизации, сформулированным в свое время В.О. Ключевским, позволило авторам данной публикации выявить доминирующие факторы музейной истории России и выделить четыре периода ее развития. The paper describes unexplored topic of division of Russian museum history into periods. The authors of the article used the ideas of a prominent Russian historian A.Y. Gurevich. He said that scientific concept of division into periods helps to dismember the historical process and focus on the study of a specific plot. Moreover, different aspects of historical development possess their own division. Using this notion, the authors of article pointed out that the original study of the Russian Museum history was based on universal division. The basis of the criteria of division into periods created formation theory of social development. So Russian investigators studied the history of museums during feudalism, i.e. XVIII - first half of XIX century. A.M. Razgon, D.A. Ravikovich and others studied the history of Russian museums for capitalism, which was dated as 1861-1917. The dismemberment of Russian museum history for socialism had different stages of development. For example, the investigators studied museum history during the Revolution in 1917-1918. They concentrated on a period of the economy recovery in 1920-1925, then they considered the museum history during so-called Stalin's five-year plans (1928-1941), as well as Great Patriotic war, and the post-war Soviet five-year plans, etc. Changes in the socio-political developments in Russia in 1990s entailed an update of division into periods. Moscow museologist A.A. Sundieva developed a cultural model of the dismemberment of Museum development. This model includes the protomuseum period (to the beginning of the XVIII century), the time of the genesis of Museum as a cultural form (XVIII-XIX centuries), the acquisition of status of cultural norm by museums (1890-1920), and the inclusion of museums in the national cultural tradition (1930-1990s). By the same time Omsk museologist N.A. Tomilov had prepared a new model of division into periods. It reflects the specific events of Russian museum history and includes nine separate stages of museum development. Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса |
| Idioma: | rus |
| Publicat: |
2019
|
| Col·lecció: | Культурное наследие |
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38569992 |
| Format: | Electrònic Capítol de llibre |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=661722 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa0a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 661722 | ||
| 005 | 20260715071722.0 | ||
| 035 | |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\32553 | ||
| 090 | |a 661722 | ||
| 100 | |a 20200210d2019 k||y0rusy50 ca | ||
| 101 | 0 | |a rus | |
| 102 | |a RU | ||
| 135 | |a drcn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | |a i | |
| 182 | 0 | |a b | |
| 200 | 1 | |a К вопросу о периодизации истории музейного дела России |d To the issue on division of Russian museum history into periods |f Н. М. Дмитриенко, С. Е. Григорьева | |
| 203 | |a Текст |c электронный | ||
| 225 | 1 | |a Культурное наследие | |
| 300 | |a Заглавие с экрана | ||
| 320 | |a [Библиогр.: 30 назв.] | ||
| 330 | |a Рассматривается недостаточно изученная тема членения истории российского музейного Дела на периоды. Показано, что в продолжение 1930-1980-х гг. периоДизация музейной истории строилась на основе формационной теории общественного развития. Со сменой парадигмы музееведения в 1990-х гг. были начаты разработки новых моделей периодизации. Обращение к принципам периодизации, сформулированным в свое время В.О. Ключевским, позволило авторам данной публикации выявить доминирующие факторы музейной истории России и выделить четыре периода ее развития. | ||
| 330 | |a The paper describes unexplored topic of division of Russian museum history into periods. The authors of the article used the ideas of a prominent Russian historian A.Y. Gurevich. He said that scientific concept of division into periods helps to dismember the historical process and focus on the study of a specific plot. Moreover, different aspects of historical development possess their own division. Using this notion, the authors of article pointed out that the original study of the Russian Museum history was based on universal division. The basis of the criteria of division into periods created formation theory of social development. So Russian investigators studied the history of museums during feudalism, i.e. XVIII - first half of XIX century. A.M. Razgon, D.A. Ravikovich and others studied the history of Russian museums for capitalism, which was dated as 1861-1917. The dismemberment of Russian museum history for socialism had different stages of development. For example, the investigators studied museum history during the Revolution in 1917-1918. They concentrated on a period of the economy recovery in 1920-1925, then they considered the museum history during so-called Stalin's five-year plans (1928-1941), as well as Great Patriotic war, and the post-war Soviet five-year plans, etc. Changes in the socio-political developments in Russia in 1990s entailed an update of division into periods. Moscow museologist A.A. Sundieva developed a cultural model of the dismemberment of Museum development. This model includes the protomuseum period (to the beginning of the XVIII century), the time of the genesis of Museum as a cultural form (XVIII-XIX centuries), the acquisition of status of cultural norm by museums (1890-1920), and the inclusion of museums in the national cultural tradition (1930-1990s). By the same time Omsk museologist N.A. Tomilov had prepared a new model of division into periods. It reflects the specific events of Russian museum history and includes nine separate stages of museum development. | ||
| 333 | |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса | ||
| 461 | |t Вестник Томского государственного университета. Культурология и искусствоведение | ||
| 463 | |t № 34 |v [С. 197-204] |d 2019 | ||
| 510 | 1 | |a To the issue on division of Russian museum history into periods |z eng | |
| 610 | 1 | |a электронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a труды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | |a музейное дело | |
| 610 | 1 | |a периодизация | |
| 610 | 1 | |a Россия | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Дмитриенко |b Н. М. |g Надежда Михайловна | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Григорьева |b С. Е. |c специалист по экспозиционной и выставочной деятельности |c музеолог Томского политехнического университета, кандидат исторических наук |f 1985- |g Светлана Евгеньевна |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\46058 | |
| 712 | 0 | 2 | |a Томский политехнический университет |c 1991- |7 ca |8 rus |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\15902 |9 26305 |
| 801 | 2 | |a RU |b 63413507 |c 20200210 |g RCR | |
| 850 | |a 63413507 | ||
| 856 | 4 | |u https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38569992 | |
| 942 | |c CF | ||